Afiba Manza-A Agovi, Caitlin T Thompson, Kevin J Craten, Esther Fasanmi, Meng Pan, Rohit P Ojha, Erika L Thompson
{"title":"在城市安全网医疗系统中实施长效注射抗逆转录病毒疗法计划时患者和诊所员工的观点。","authors":"Afiba Manza-A Agovi, Caitlin T Thompson, Kevin J Craten, Esther Fasanmi, Meng Pan, Rohit P Ojha, Erika L Thompson","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00631-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (LAI CAB/RPV) has several potential benefits over daily oral formulations for HIV treatment, including the potential to facilitate long-term adherence and reduce pill fatigue. We aimed to assess facilitators of and barriers to LAI CAB/RPV implementation and delivery through the perspectives of physicians and clinical staff, and the experiences of LAI CAB/RPV use among people living with HIV (PLWH) at a Ryan-White supported safety-net clinic in North Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with recruited clinic staff (physicians, nurses, and support staff) involved with LAI CAB/RPV implementation and PLWH who switched to LAI CAB/RPV and consented to participate in individual interviews. Data were collected from July to October 2023. Our interview guide was informed by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM), and Proctor Implementation Outcomes frameworks. Qualitative data were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis approach to summarize key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited and interviewed 15 PLWH who transitioned to LAI CAB/RPV and 11 clinic staff serving these patients. PLWH conveyed that emotional and informational support from family or a trusted clinician influenced their decision to switch to LAI CAB/RPV. PLWH also reported that injectable treatment was more effective, convenient, and acceptable than oral antiretroviral therapy. Clinic staff and physicians reported that staff training, pharmacist-led medication switches, flexible appointments, refrigeration space and designated room for injection delivery facilitated implementation. Clinic staff cited medication costs, understaffing, insurance prior authorization requirements, and lack of medication access through state drug assistance programs as critical barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study offers insights into real-world experiences with LAI usage from the patient perspective and identifies potential strategies to promote LAI CAB/RPV uptake. The barriers to and facilitators of LAI CAB/RPV program implementation reported by clinic staff in our study may be useful for informing strategies to optimize LAI CAB/RPV programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and clinic staff perspectives on the implementation of a long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy program in an urban safety-net health system.\",\"authors\":\"Afiba Manza-A Agovi, Caitlin T Thompson, Kevin J Craten, Esther Fasanmi, Meng Pan, Rohit P Ojha, Erika L Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-024-00631-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (LAI CAB/RPV) has several potential benefits over daily oral formulations for HIV treatment, including the potential to facilitate long-term adherence and reduce pill fatigue. We aimed to assess facilitators of and barriers to LAI CAB/RPV implementation and delivery through the perspectives of physicians and clinical staff, and the experiences of LAI CAB/RPV use among people living with HIV (PLWH) at a Ryan-White supported safety-net clinic in North Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with recruited clinic staff (physicians, nurses, and support staff) involved with LAI CAB/RPV implementation and PLWH who switched to LAI CAB/RPV and consented to participate in individual interviews. Data were collected from July to October 2023. Our interview guide was informed by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM), and Proctor Implementation Outcomes frameworks. Qualitative data were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis approach to summarize key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited and interviewed 15 PLWH who transitioned to LAI CAB/RPV and 11 clinic staff serving these patients. PLWH conveyed that emotional and informational support from family or a trusted clinician influenced their decision to switch to LAI CAB/RPV. PLWH also reported that injectable treatment was more effective, convenient, and acceptable than oral antiretroviral therapy. Clinic staff and physicians reported that staff training, pharmacist-led medication switches, flexible appointments, refrigeration space and designated room for injection delivery facilitated implementation. Clinic staff cited medication costs, understaffing, insurance prior authorization requirements, and lack of medication access through state drug assistance programs as critical barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study offers insights into real-world experiences with LAI usage from the patient perspective and identifies potential strategies to promote LAI CAB/RPV uptake. The barriers to and facilitators of LAI CAB/RPV program implementation reported by clinic staff in our study may be useful for informing strategies to optimize LAI CAB/RPV programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00631-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00631-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与每日口服制剂相比,长效注射卡博替拉韦加利匹韦林(LAI CAB/RPV)在艾滋病治疗中具有多种潜在优势,包括促进长期依从性和减少服药疲劳的潜力。我们的目的是通过医生和临床工作人员的视角评估LAI CAB/RPV实施和交付的促进因素和障碍,以及北德克萨斯州一家由Ryan-White支持的安全网诊所的HIV感染者(PLWH)使用LAI CAB/RPV的经验:我们对参与 LAI CAB/RPV 实施的诊所员工(医生、护士和辅助人员)以及转用 LAI CAB/RPV 并同意参加个别访谈的 PLWH 进行了半结构化访谈。数据收集时间为2023年7月至10月。我们的访谈指南参考了Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、Implementation、Maintenance(RE-AIM)和Proctor实施结果框架。我们采用快速定性分析方法对定性数据进行了分析,以总结关键主题:我们招募并采访了15名过渡到LAI CAB/RPV的PLWH和11名为这些患者服务的诊所工作人员。PLWH 表示,来自家人或值得信赖的临床医生的情感和信息支持影响了他们转用 LAI CAB/RPV 的决定。PLWH 还表示,注射治疗比口服抗逆转录病毒治疗更有效、更方便、更容易接受。诊所员工和医生表示,员工培训、药剂师主导的药物转换、灵活的预约时间、冷藏空间和指定的注射室都促进了注射治疗的实施。诊所工作人员认为,药物成本、人手不足、保险事先授权要求以及无法通过州药物援助计划获得药物是关键障碍:我们的研究从患者的角度深入了解了使用LAI的实际经验,并确定了促进LAI CAB/RPV使用的潜在策略。在我们的研究中,诊所工作人员报告的LAI CAB/RPV计划实施障碍和促进因素可能有助于为优化LAI CAB/RPV计划的策略提供信息。
Patient and clinic staff perspectives on the implementation of a long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy program in an urban safety-net health system.
Background: Long-acting injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (LAI CAB/RPV) has several potential benefits over daily oral formulations for HIV treatment, including the potential to facilitate long-term adherence and reduce pill fatigue. We aimed to assess facilitators of and barriers to LAI CAB/RPV implementation and delivery through the perspectives of physicians and clinical staff, and the experiences of LAI CAB/RPV use among people living with HIV (PLWH) at a Ryan-White supported safety-net clinic in North Texas.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with recruited clinic staff (physicians, nurses, and support staff) involved with LAI CAB/RPV implementation and PLWH who switched to LAI CAB/RPV and consented to participate in individual interviews. Data were collected from July to October 2023. Our interview guide was informed by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM), and Proctor Implementation Outcomes frameworks. Qualitative data were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analysis approach to summarize key themes.
Results: We recruited and interviewed 15 PLWH who transitioned to LAI CAB/RPV and 11 clinic staff serving these patients. PLWH conveyed that emotional and informational support from family or a trusted clinician influenced their decision to switch to LAI CAB/RPV. PLWH also reported that injectable treatment was more effective, convenient, and acceptable than oral antiretroviral therapy. Clinic staff and physicians reported that staff training, pharmacist-led medication switches, flexible appointments, refrigeration space and designated room for injection delivery facilitated implementation. Clinic staff cited medication costs, understaffing, insurance prior authorization requirements, and lack of medication access through state drug assistance programs as critical barriers.
Conclusions: Our study offers insights into real-world experiences with LAI usage from the patient perspective and identifies potential strategies to promote LAI CAB/RPV uptake. The barriers to and facilitators of LAI CAB/RPV program implementation reported by clinic staff in our study may be useful for informing strategies to optimize LAI CAB/RPV programs.