Tejaswini M Dhawale, Roopa S Bhat, P Connor Johnson, Shanivi Srikonda, Kelsey S Lau-Min, Kofi Boateng, Howard Lee, Hermioni L Amonoo, Ryan Nipp, Charlotta Lindvall, Areej El-Jawahri
{"title":"晚期肺癌患者基于远程医疗的重病对话、医疗保健利用率和临终关怀。","authors":"Tejaswini M Dhawale, Roopa S Bhat, P Connor Johnson, Shanivi Srikonda, Kelsey S Lau-Min, Kofi Boateng, Howard Lee, Hermioni L Amonoo, Ryan Nipp, Charlotta Lindvall, Areej El-Jawahri","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about serious illness conversations (SIC) conducted during telemedicine visits and their impact on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis telemedicine visits for patients with metastatic lung cancer conducted during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (October 3, 2020-October 6, 2020). We used natural language processing (NLP) to characterize documentation of SIC domains (ie, goals of care [GOC], limitation of life-sustaining treatment [LLST], prognostic awareness [PA], palliative care [PC], and hospice). We used unadjusted logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with SIC documentation and the relationship between SIC documentation and EOL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 634 telemedicine visits across 360 patients. Documentation of at least one SIC domain was present in 188 (29.7%) visits with GOC and PA being the most discussed domains. Family presence (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .004), progressive or newly diagnosed disease (OR, 5.42; P < .000), age ≥ 70 (OR, 1.80; P = .009), and male sex (OR, 2.23; P < .000) were associated with a greater likelihood of discussing ≥ 1 SIC domain. Of the 61 patients who died within 12 months of the study period, having ≥ 1 SIC domain discussed was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 0.27; P = .020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study of telehealth visits, we identified important factors associated with an increased likelihood of having documentation of an SIC and demonstrated that SIC documentation correlated with lower likelihood of hospitalization at EOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1762-e1769"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine-based serious illness conversations, healthcare utilization, and end of life care among patients with advanced lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Tejaswini M Dhawale, Roopa S Bhat, P Connor Johnson, Shanivi Srikonda, Kelsey S Lau-Min, Kofi Boateng, Howard Lee, Hermioni L Amonoo, Ryan Nipp, Charlotta Lindvall, Areej El-Jawahri\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oncolo/oyae216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about serious illness conversations (SIC) conducted during telemedicine visits and their impact on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis telemedicine visits for patients with metastatic lung cancer conducted during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (October 3, 2020-October 6, 2020). We used natural language processing (NLP) to characterize documentation of SIC domains (ie, goals of care [GOC], limitation of life-sustaining treatment [LLST], prognostic awareness [PA], palliative care [PC], and hospice). We used unadjusted logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with SIC documentation and the relationship between SIC documentation and EOL outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 634 telemedicine visits across 360 patients. Documentation of at least one SIC domain was present in 188 (29.7%) visits with GOC and PA being the most discussed domains. Family presence (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .004), progressive or newly diagnosed disease (OR, 5.42; P < .000), age ≥ 70 (OR, 1.80; P = .009), and male sex (OR, 2.23; P < .000) were associated with a greater likelihood of discussing ≥ 1 SIC domain. Of the 61 patients who died within 12 months of the study period, having ≥ 1 SIC domain discussed was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 0.27; P = .020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study of telehealth visits, we identified important factors associated with an increased likelihood of having documentation of an SIC and demonstrated that SIC documentation correlated with lower likelihood of hospitalization at EOL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1762-e1769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630782/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae216\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:人们对在远程医疗访问期间进行的重病对话(SIC)及其对晚期癌症患者生命末期(EOL)结局的影响知之甚少:我们对 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 10 月 3 日至 2020 年 10 月 6 日)转移性肺癌患者的远程医疗就诊进行了回顾性分析。我们使用自然语言处理 (NLP) 来描述 SIC 领域(即护理目标 [GOC]、维持生命治疗的限制 [LLST]、预后意识 [PA]、姑息治疗 [PC] 和临终关怀)的文档特征。我们使用未经调整的逻辑回归法评估了与 SIC 文件相关的因素以及 SIC 文件与临终关怀结果之间的关系:这项研究包括 360 名患者的 634 次远程医疗就诊。188人次(29.7%)至少有一个SIC领域的记录,其中GOC和PA是讨论最多的领域。在这项关于远程医疗就诊的研究中,我们发现了与记录 SIC 的可能性增加相关的重要因素,并证明 SIC 记录与临终时住院的可能性降低相关。
Telemedicine-based serious illness conversations, healthcare utilization, and end of life care among patients with advanced lung cancer.
Purpose: Little is known about serious illness conversations (SIC) conducted during telemedicine visits and their impact on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.
Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis telemedicine visits for patients with metastatic lung cancer conducted during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic (October 3, 2020-October 6, 2020). We used natural language processing (NLP) to characterize documentation of SIC domains (ie, goals of care [GOC], limitation of life-sustaining treatment [LLST], prognostic awareness [PA], palliative care [PC], and hospice). We used unadjusted logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with SIC documentation and the relationship between SIC documentation and EOL outcomes.
Results: The study included 634 telemedicine visits across 360 patients. Documentation of at least one SIC domain was present in 188 (29.7%) visits with GOC and PA being the most discussed domains. Family presence (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .004), progressive or newly diagnosed disease (OR, 5.42; P < .000), age ≥ 70 (OR, 1.80; P = .009), and male sex (OR, 2.23; P < .000) were associated with a greater likelihood of discussing ≥ 1 SIC domain. Of the 61 patients who died within 12 months of the study period, having ≥ 1 SIC domain discussed was associated with a lower likelihood of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life (OR, 0.27; P = .020).
Conclusion: In this study of telehealth visits, we identified important factors associated with an increased likelihood of having documentation of an SIC and demonstrated that SIC documentation correlated with lower likelihood of hospitalization at EOL.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.