地塞米松作为小儿足部手术中罗哌卡因腘坐骨神经阻滞的神经周围辅助药物:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Malgorzata Reysner, Tomasz Reysner, Piotr Janusz, Grzegorz Kowalski, Milud Shadi, Przemysław Daroszewski, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Tomasz Kotwicki
{"title":"地塞米松作为小儿足部手术中罗哌卡因腘坐骨神经阻滞的神经周围辅助药物:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Malgorzata Reysner, Tomasz Reysner, Piotr Janusz, Grzegorz Kowalski, Milud Shadi, Przemysław Daroszewski, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Tomasz Kotwicki","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effect of perineural dexamethasone on block duration, opioid requirement, blood glucose levels, and stress response to surgery as measured by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), following pediatric foot and ankle surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 90 children (ages 2-5 years, >5 kg) scheduled for foot or ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia with ultrasound-guided single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block were randomized into 3 groups: 0.5% ropivacaine with saline (control), 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg (DEX0.1), and 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg (DEX0.05). Primary outcome was the time to first rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included motor block duration, pain scores, NLR, PLR, and blood glucose levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time to first rescue opioid analgesia was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group compared with the DEX0.05 group (18.4 hours, SD 2.6 hours vs 16 hours, SD 2.8 hours), with a mean difference of 2.2 hours (95% CI 0.7 to 3.6), p<0.01; and the control group (8.5 hours, SD 1.5 hours), with a mean difference of -9.9 (95% CI -11.4 to -8.4), p<0.001. Motor block was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group (17.3 hours, SD 2.5 hours) compared with the DEX0.05 (15.2 hours, SD 2.7 hours; p<0.01) and control groups (7.8±1.1, p<0.001). Total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the DEX0.1 group compared with the control group (p=0.01). NLR, PLR, and glucose levels did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline, 24 hours, and 48 hours post surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged postoperative motor block duration and did not influence blood glucose, NLR, or PLR levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06086418.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexamethasone as a perineural adjuvant to a ropivacaine popliteal sciatic nerve block for pediatric foot surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Malgorzata Reysner, Tomasz Reysner, Piotr Janusz, Grzegorz Kowalski, Milud Shadi, Przemysław Daroszewski, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Tomasz Kotwicki\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the effect of perineural dexamethasone on block duration, opioid requirement, blood glucose levels, and stress response to surgery as measured by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), following pediatric foot and ankle surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 90 children (ages 2-5 years, >5 kg) scheduled for foot or ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia with ultrasound-guided single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block were randomized into 3 groups: 0.5% ropivacaine with saline (control), 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg (DEX0.1), and 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg (DEX0.05). Primary outcome was the time to first rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included motor block duration, pain scores, NLR, PLR, and blood glucose levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time to first rescue opioid analgesia was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group compared with the DEX0.05 group (18.4 hours, SD 2.6 hours vs 16 hours, SD 2.8 hours), with a mean difference of 2.2 hours (95% CI 0.7 to 3.6), p<0.01; and the control group (8.5 hours, SD 1.5 hours), with a mean difference of -9.9 (95% CI -11.4 to -8.4), p<0.001. Motor block was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group (17.3 hours, SD 2.5 hours) compared with the DEX0.05 (15.2 hours, SD 2.7 hours; p<0.01) and control groups (7.8±1.1, p<0.001). Total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the DEX0.1 group compared with the control group (p=0.01). NLR, PLR, and glucose levels did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline, 24 hours, and 48 hours post surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged postoperative motor block duration and did not influence blood glucose, NLR, or PLR levels.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT06086418.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105694\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105694","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了小儿足踝手术后,硬膜外地塞米松对阻滞持续时间、阿片类药物需求、血糖水平以及手术应激反应(以中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)衡量)的影响:在这项平行双盲随机对照试验中,90 名儿童(2-5 岁,体重大于 5 千克)计划在脊髓麻醉下进行足部或踝部手术,并在超声引导下进行单次腘坐骨神经阻滞,他们被随机分为 3 组:0.5%罗哌卡因加生理盐水组(对照组)、0.5%罗哌卡因加地塞米松0.1 mg/kg (DEX0.1)组和0.5%罗哌卡因加地塞米松0.05 mg/kg (DEX0.05)组。主要结果是首次阿片类镇痛抢救时间。次要结果包括运动阻滞持续时间、疼痛评分、NLR、PLR和血糖水平:与DEX0.05组相比,DEX0.1组首次阿片类镇痛抢救时间明显更长(18.4小时,SD 2.6小时 vs 16小时,SD 2.8小时),平均差异为2.2小时(95% CI 0.7-3.6),P结论:硬膜外地塞米松可明显延长术后运动阻滞持续时间,且不影响血糖、NLR或PLR水平:试验注册号:NCT06086418。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dexamethasone as a perineural adjuvant to a ropivacaine popliteal sciatic nerve block for pediatric foot surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: This study assessed the effect of perineural dexamethasone on block duration, opioid requirement, blood glucose levels, and stress response to surgery as measured by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), following pediatric foot and ankle surgery.

Methods: In this parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 90 children (ages 2-5 years, >5 kg) scheduled for foot or ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia with ultrasound-guided single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block were randomized into 3 groups: 0.5% ropivacaine with saline (control), 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg (DEX0.1), and 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg (DEX0.05). Primary outcome was the time to first rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included motor block duration, pain scores, NLR, PLR, and blood glucose levels.

Results: Time to first rescue opioid analgesia was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group compared with the DEX0.05 group (18.4 hours, SD 2.6 hours vs 16 hours, SD 2.8 hours), with a mean difference of 2.2 hours (95% CI 0.7 to 3.6), p<0.01; and the control group (8.5 hours, SD 1.5 hours), with a mean difference of -9.9 (95% CI -11.4 to -8.4), p<0.001. Motor block was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group (17.3 hours, SD 2.5 hours) compared with the DEX0.05 (15.2 hours, SD 2.7 hours; p<0.01) and control groups (7.8±1.1, p<0.001). Total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the DEX0.1 group compared with the control group (p=0.01). NLR, PLR, and glucose levels did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline, 24 hours, and 48 hours post surgery.

Conclusions: Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged postoperative motor block duration and did not influence blood glucose, NLR, or PLR levels.

Trial registration number: NCT06086418.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信