"这才是对她有用的":美国养老院对个性化积极社会心理互动计划的调整分析。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Miranda C Kunkel, Alexis Talmage, Molly Noble, Kimberly Van Haitsma, Katherine M Abbott
{"title":"\"这才是对她有用的\":美国养老院对个性化积极社会心理互动计划的调整分析。","authors":"Miranda C Kunkel, Alexis Talmage, Molly Noble, Kimberly Van Haitsma, Katherine M Abbott","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) program is an adaptable, evidence-based intervention. IPPI trains nursing home care partners to engage residents living with moderate to severe dementia in preference-based, one-to-one interactions using emotion-focused communication. We sought to understand provider-driven adaptations made to the IPPI program and whether the adaptations made were fidelity-consistent.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were collected from n = 78 interviews with n = 23 nursing home provider champions who led a quality improvement project to implement the IPPI program with 3-5 residents per care community. Using content analysis, we report quantitative data on the adaptation characteristics according to the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded core modules and participant quotes to illustrate adaptations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Champions reported 34 adaptations, with an average of 2.6 adaptations per nursing home. The majority of IPPI adaptations pertained to implementation (65%; n = 22), whereas 17% (n = 6) were content and 17% (n = 6) were context. Some adaptations were motivated by the organization (e.g., time constraints), while others were motivated by the recipient (e.g., cognitive capacity). Most adaptations made to the IPPI protocol by care partners were fidelity-consistent (92%; n = 33).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Care partners' adaptations to the IPPI made the intervention more resident-centric. Future healthcare intervention providers must consider the user perspective and encourage adaptations that further tailor to the user, as long as the adaptations are fidelity-consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's What Would Work for Her\\\": An Analysis of Adaptations to the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction Program in U.S. Nursing Homes.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda C Kunkel, Alexis Talmage, Molly Noble, Kimberly Van Haitsma, Katherine M Abbott\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) program is an adaptable, evidence-based intervention. IPPI trains nursing home care partners to engage residents living with moderate to severe dementia in preference-based, one-to-one interactions using emotion-focused communication. We sought to understand provider-driven adaptations made to the IPPI program and whether the adaptations made were fidelity-consistent.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were collected from n = 78 interviews with n = 23 nursing home provider champions who led a quality improvement project to implement the IPPI program with 3-5 residents per care community. Using content analysis, we report quantitative data on the adaptation characteristics according to the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded core modules and participant quotes to illustrate adaptations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Champions reported 34 adaptations, with an average of 2.6 adaptations per nursing home. The majority of IPPI adaptations pertained to implementation (65%; n = 22), whereas 17% (n = 6) were content and 17% (n = 6) were context. Some adaptations were motivated by the organization (e.g., time constraints), while others were motivated by the recipient (e.g., cognitive capacity). Most adaptations made to the IPPI protocol by care partners were fidelity-consistent (92%; n = 33).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Care partners' adaptations to the IPPI made the intervention more resident-centric. Future healthcare intervention providers must consider the user perspective and encourage adaptations that further tailor to the user, as long as the adaptations are fidelity-consistent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:个性化积极社会心理互动(IPPI)计划是一项适应性强、以证据为基础的干预措施。IPPI 通过培训疗养院护理合作伙伴,让患有中度至重度痴呆症的居民参与到以偏好为基础、一对一的互动中,并使用以情感为重点的沟通方式。我们试图了解服务提供者对 IPPI 计划所做的调整,以及所做的调整是否忠实一致:研究设计:我们对 23 名养老院护理人员进行了 78 次访谈,这些护理人员领导了一个质量改进项目(QIP),在每个护理社区的 3 到 5 名居民中实施 IPPI。通过内容分析,我们根据 "报告适应性和修改框架-扩展版"(FRAME)核心模块报告了适应性特征的定量数据,并引用了参与者的话来说明适应性:支持者报告了 34 项改造,平均每家养老院有 2.6 项改造。大多数 IPPI 调整与实施有关(65%;n=22),17%(n=6)与内容有关,17%(n=6)与环境有关。调整的动机有组织方面的(如时间限制),也有受助者方面的(如认知能力)。护理伙伴对 IPPI 协议的大多数调整都是忠实一致的(92%;n=33):护理伙伴对 IPPI 的调整使干预更加以居民为中心。未来的医疗干预提供者必须从使用者的角度考虑问题,并鼓励进一步根据使用者的情况进行调整,只要这些调整是忠实一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It's What Would Work for Her": An Analysis of Adaptations to the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction Program in U.S. Nursing Homes.

Background and objectives: The Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) program is an adaptable, evidence-based intervention. IPPI trains nursing home care partners to engage residents living with moderate to severe dementia in preference-based, one-to-one interactions using emotion-focused communication. We sought to understand provider-driven adaptations made to the IPPI program and whether the adaptations made were fidelity-consistent.

Research design and methods: Data were collected from n = 78 interviews with n = 23 nursing home provider champions who led a quality improvement project to implement the IPPI program with 3-5 residents per care community. Using content analysis, we report quantitative data on the adaptation characteristics according to the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded core modules and participant quotes to illustrate adaptations.

Results: Champions reported 34 adaptations, with an average of 2.6 adaptations per nursing home. The majority of IPPI adaptations pertained to implementation (65%; n = 22), whereas 17% (n = 6) were content and 17% (n = 6) were context. Some adaptations were motivated by the organization (e.g., time constraints), while others were motivated by the recipient (e.g., cognitive capacity). Most adaptations made to the IPPI protocol by care partners were fidelity-consistent (92%; n = 33).

Discussion and implications: Care partners' adaptations to the IPPI made the intervention more resident-centric. Future healthcare intervention providers must consider the user perspective and encourage adaptations that further tailor to the user, as long as the adaptations are fidelity-consistent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信