护士对痴呆症患者疼痛评估的信念:以计划行为理论为指导的定性研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Madushika Wishvanie Kodagoda Gamage, Lihui Pu, Michael Todorovic, Wendy Moyle
{"title":"护士对痴呆症患者疼痛评估的信念:以计划行为理论为指导的定性研究。","authors":"Madushika Wishvanie Kodagoda Gamage, Lihui Pu, Michael Todorovic, Wendy Moyle","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore registered nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive exploratory qualitative study informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted from January to April 2023 with a purposive sample of 15 registered nurses caring for people with dementia. Following transcription, data were analysed using direct content analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Registered nurses believe pain assessment improves the well-being of people with dementia and informs and evaluates practice. However, there is a possibility of misdiagnosing pain as agitation or behavioural problems, leading to inaccurate pain management. Interpersonal factors, such as registered nurses' knowledge and experience, beliefs and motivation to improve care provision, were the primary facilitators of pain assessment. Physical and behavioural dimensions of the pain of the dementia syndrome were the most reported barriers to pain assessment. Registered nurses reported that multidisciplinary team members expect them to do pain assessments. Most did not experience disapproval when performing pain assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Registered nurses hold beliefs about pain assessment benefits, consequences, enablers, barriers, approvals and disapprovals regarding dementia. The findings could inform interventions to enhance pain assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Policymakers should provide education opportunities for registered nurses to improve their knowledge, skills and beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. Future research should develop and implement multidisciplinary, multifaceted pain assessment protocols to enhance the accuracy of pain assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Pain is underassessed in dementia, and this could stem from registered nurses' beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. The findings could inform interventions to enhance pain assessment beliefs and practices.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the COREQ criteria.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Registered nurses caring for people living with dementia participated as interview respondents.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Beliefs About Pain Assessment in Dementia: A Qualitative Study Informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour.\",\"authors\":\"Madushika Wishvanie Kodagoda Gamage, Lihui Pu, Michael Todorovic, Wendy Moyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore registered nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive exploratory qualitative study informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted from January to April 2023 with a purposive sample of 15 registered nurses caring for people with dementia. Following transcription, data were analysed using direct content analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Registered nurses believe pain assessment improves the well-being of people with dementia and informs and evaluates practice. However, there is a possibility of misdiagnosing pain as agitation or behavioural problems, leading to inaccurate pain management. Interpersonal factors, such as registered nurses' knowledge and experience, beliefs and motivation to improve care provision, were the primary facilitators of pain assessment. Physical and behavioural dimensions of the pain of the dementia syndrome were the most reported barriers to pain assessment. Registered nurses reported that multidisciplinary team members expect them to do pain assessments. Most did not experience disapproval when performing pain assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Registered nurses hold beliefs about pain assessment benefits, consequences, enablers, barriers, approvals and disapprovals regarding dementia. The findings could inform interventions to enhance pain assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>Policymakers should provide education opportunities for registered nurses to improve their knowledge, skills and beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. Future research should develop and implement multidisciplinary, multifaceted pain assessment protocols to enhance the accuracy of pain assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Pain is underassessed in dementia, and this could stem from registered nurses' beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. The findings could inform interventions to enhance pain assessment beliefs and practices.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study adhered to the COREQ criteria.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Registered nurses caring for people living with dementia participated as interview respondents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨注册护士对痴呆症患者疼痛评估的看法:方法:从 2023 年 1 月到 4 月,对 15 名特定样本的痴呆症患者进行了在线半结构式深度访谈:2023 年 1 月至 4 月,对 15 名护理痴呆症患者的注册护士进行了在线半结构式深度访谈。转录后,采用直接内容分析法对数据进行分析:注册护士认为疼痛评估可以改善痴呆症患者的福祉,并为实践提供信息和评估。但是,也有可能将疼痛误诊为躁动或行为问题,导致疼痛管理不准确。人际因素,如注册护士的知识和经验、信念和改善护理服务的动机,是疼痛评估的主要促进因素。据报告,痴呆综合症疼痛的身体和行为方面是疼痛评估的最大障碍。注册护士报告说,多学科团队成员希望他们进行疼痛评估。大多数人在进行疼痛评估时没有遇到不认可:注册护士对痴呆症进行疼痛评估的益处、后果、促进因素、障碍、认可和不认可的信念。这些发现可为加强疼痛评估实践的干预措施提供依据:政策制定者应为注册护士提供教育机会,以提高她们对痴呆症疼痛评估的知识、技能和信念。未来的研究应开发和实施多学科、多方面的疼痛评估方案,以提高疼痛评估实践的准确性:影响:痴呆症患者的疼痛评估不足,这可能源于注册护士对痴呆症患者疼痛评估的信念。研究结果可为加强疼痛评估信念和实践的干预措施提供参考:本研究符合 COREQ 标准:护理痴呆症患者的注册护士作为访谈对象参与了研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' Beliefs About Pain Assessment in Dementia: A Qualitative Study Informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Aim: To explore registered nurses' beliefs regarding pain assessment in people living with dementia.

Design: A descriptive exploratory qualitative study informed by the Theory of Planned Behaviour.

Methods: Online semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted from January to April 2023 with a purposive sample of 15 registered nurses caring for people with dementia. Following transcription, data were analysed using direct content analysis.

Findings: Registered nurses believe pain assessment improves the well-being of people with dementia and informs and evaluates practice. However, there is a possibility of misdiagnosing pain as agitation or behavioural problems, leading to inaccurate pain management. Interpersonal factors, such as registered nurses' knowledge and experience, beliefs and motivation to improve care provision, were the primary facilitators of pain assessment. Physical and behavioural dimensions of the pain of the dementia syndrome were the most reported barriers to pain assessment. Registered nurses reported that multidisciplinary team members expect them to do pain assessments. Most did not experience disapproval when performing pain assessments.

Conclusion: Registered nurses hold beliefs about pain assessment benefits, consequences, enablers, barriers, approvals and disapprovals regarding dementia. The findings could inform interventions to enhance pain assessment practices.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: Policymakers should provide education opportunities for registered nurses to improve their knowledge, skills and beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. Future research should develop and implement multidisciplinary, multifaceted pain assessment protocols to enhance the accuracy of pain assessment practices.

Impact: Pain is underassessed in dementia, and this could stem from registered nurses' beliefs about pain assessment in dementia. The findings could inform interventions to enhance pain assessment beliefs and practices.

Reporting method: This study adhered to the COREQ criteria.

Patient or public contribution: Registered nurses caring for people living with dementia participated as interview respondents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信