利用 CRISPR 技术检测结核分枝杆菌:最新系统综述与元分析》。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mohammad Abavisani, Sobhan Karbas Foroushan, Reza Khayami, Amirhossein Sahebkar
{"title":"利用 CRISPR 技术检测结核分枝杆菌:最新系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Mohammad Abavisani, Sobhan Karbas Foroushan, Reza Khayami, Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.1007/s40291-024-00741-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid and precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is paramount for effective management and control of tuberculosis. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has emerged as a promising tool for pathogenic diagnosis owing to its specificity and adaptability. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR-based techniques in identifying MTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meticulous search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data synthesis and analyses, including subgroup analyses, were performed with R v 4.3.1, examining variables like CRISPR variants, gene targets, pre-amplification techniques, and signal readout methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 389 identified studies, 14 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 2175 MTB strains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR-based techniques were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 273.4379 (95% CI 103.3311-723.5794), with an area under the curve of 0.97 for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, denoting excellent diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses illustrated variations in diagnostic metrics based on factors like CRISPR variant utilized, target gene, and pre-amplification methods. For instance, CRISPR-Cas12 exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1), respectively. Moreover, this technology showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% in detecting resistant MTB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRISPR-based methods exhibit substantial diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detecting MTB, with notable variances across different CRISPR variants and methodological approaches. Further studies must be conducted to optimize CRISPR's potential as a diagnostic tool for MTB in a variety of clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49797,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Using CRISPR Technology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abavisani, Sobhan Karbas Foroushan, Reza Khayami, Amirhossein Sahebkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40291-024-00741-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid and precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is paramount for effective management and control of tuberculosis. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has emerged as a promising tool for pathogenic diagnosis owing to its specificity and adaptability. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR-based techniques in identifying MTB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meticulous search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data synthesis and analyses, including subgroup analyses, were performed with R v 4.3.1, examining variables like CRISPR variants, gene targets, pre-amplification techniques, and signal readout methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 389 identified studies, 14 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 2175 MTB strains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR-based techniques were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 273.4379 (95% CI 103.3311-723.5794), with an area under the curve of 0.97 for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, denoting excellent diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses illustrated variations in diagnostic metrics based on factors like CRISPR variant utilized, target gene, and pre-amplification methods. For instance, CRISPR-Cas12 exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1), respectively. Moreover, this technology showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% in detecting resistant MTB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRISPR-based methods exhibit substantial diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detecting MTB, with notable variances across different CRISPR variants and methodological approaches. Further studies must be conducted to optimize CRISPR's potential as a diagnostic tool for MTB in a variety of clinical and research settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-024-00741-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-024-00741-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快速、精确地检测结核分枝杆菌(MTB)对于有效管理和控制结核病至关重要。由于其特异性和适应性,聚类规则间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)技术已成为一种很有前途的病原诊断工具。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估基于CRISPR的技术在鉴定MTB方面的诊断准确性:方法:在 Medline、Scopus、Embase 和 ISI Web of Science 中进行了细致的搜索,以检索相关研究,并遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。研究质量采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)核对表进行评估。数据综合与分析(包括亚组分析)使用 R v 4.3.1 进行,对 CRISPR 变体、基因靶点、预扩增技术和信号读出方法等变量进行了研究:在已确定的 389 项研究中,有 14 项符合纳入标准,涉及 2175 株 MTB 菌株。基于CRISPR技术的集合敏感性和特异性分别为0.93(95% CI 0.85-0.99)和0.97(95% CI 0.94-0.99)。汇总诊断几率比为 273.4379(95% CI 103.3311-723.5794),汇总接收者操作特征曲线(SROC)的曲线下面积为 0.97,表明诊断准确性极高。亚组分析表明,根据所使用的CRISPR变体、靶基因和预扩增方法等因素,诊断指标存在差异。例如,CRISPR-Cas12 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.93(95% CI 0.78-0.98)和 0.98(95% CI 0.93-1)。此外,该技术在检测耐药 MTB 方面的灵敏度为 96%,特异性为 100%:基于CRISPR的方法在检测MTB方面表现出了很高的诊断灵敏度和特异性,但不同的CRISPR变体和方法存在明显差异。必须开展进一步的研究,以优化 CRISPR 在各种临床和研究环境中作为 MTB 诊断工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Using CRISPR Technology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Detection Using CRISPR Technology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Rapid and precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is paramount for effective management and control of tuberculosis. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology has emerged as a promising tool for pathogenic diagnosis owing to its specificity and adaptability. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of CRISPR-based techniques in identifying MTB.

Methods: A meticulous search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science to retrieve relevant studies, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Data synthesis and analyses, including subgroup analyses, were performed with R v 4.3.1, examining variables like CRISPR variants, gene targets, pre-amplification techniques, and signal readout methods.

Results: From 389 identified studies, 14 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 2175 MTB strains. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR-based techniques were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.99), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 273.4379 (95% CI 103.3311-723.5794), with an area under the curve of 0.97 for the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, denoting excellent diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses illustrated variations in diagnostic metrics based on factors like CRISPR variant utilized, target gene, and pre-amplification methods. For instance, CRISPR-Cas12 exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.78-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1), respectively. Moreover, this technology showed a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100% in detecting resistant MTB.

Conclusion: CRISPR-based methods exhibit substantial diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detecting MTB, with notable variances across different CRISPR variants and methodological approaches. Further studies must be conducted to optimize CRISPR's potential as a diagnostic tool for MTB in a variety of clinical and research settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy welcomes current opinion articles on emerging or contentious issues, comprehensive narrative reviews, systematic reviews (as outlined by the PRISMA statement), original research articles (including short communications) and letters to the editor. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信