H Poerwosusanta, D Aditia, Gunadi, P G Halim, M Yuliana
{"title":"先天性膈疝的最佳早期手术时机:系统综述。","authors":"H Poerwosusanta, D Aditia, Gunadi, P G Halim, M Yuliana","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a failure of closure of the pleuro-peritoneal canal due to faulty embryogenesis caused herniation of intra-abdominal contents into the chest. There needs to be more clarity about the optimal surgical timing for CDH. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal surgical timing for CDH using a systematic review analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020. The literature search approach used publications between 2013 and 2023 using Pubmed and SagePub databases. Studies were included if they contained reports of the best timing for emergency surgery for CHD repair. We did not include review articles and unpublished data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five articles met the criteria. The overall result, the first pre-operative 24-hour oxygenation index mean, was temporally reliable and representative (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.61-0.77). Within any severity level, there were no differences in 90-day survival or mortality rate between delayed repair and early repair (p = 0.002). As a result, there is no optimal timing for surgery in severe cases of CDH. A delay in repair did not predict an increased risk of death, nor did it suggest an increased need for post-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the severity of the illness, the timing of CDH repair does not affect the mortality rate.Surgery is done after the physiology index achievement.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal early surgery timing for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"H Poerwosusanta, D Aditia, Gunadi, P G Halim, M Yuliana\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a failure of closure of the pleuro-peritoneal canal due to faulty embryogenesis caused herniation of intra-abdominal contents into the chest. There needs to be more clarity about the optimal surgical timing for CDH. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal surgical timing for CDH using a systematic review analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020. The literature search approach used publications between 2013 and 2023 using Pubmed and SagePub databases. Studies were included if they contained reports of the best timing for emergency surgery for CHD repair. We did not include review articles and unpublished data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five articles met the criteria. The overall result, the first pre-operative 24-hour oxygenation index mean, was temporally reliable and representative (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.61-0.77). Within any severity level, there were no differences in 90-day survival or mortality rate between delayed repair and early repair (p = 0.002). As a result, there is no optimal timing for surgery in severe cases of CDH. A delay in repair did not predict an increased risk of death, nor did it suggest an increased need for post-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygen therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of the severity of the illness, the timing of CDH repair does not affect the mortality rate.Surgery is done after the physiology index achievement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal early surgery timing for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review.
Introduction: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a failure of closure of the pleuro-peritoneal canal due to faulty embryogenesis caused herniation of intra-abdominal contents into the chest. There needs to be more clarity about the optimal surgical timing for CDH. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal surgical timing for CDH using a systematic review analysis.
Materials and methods: Our study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020. The literature search approach used publications between 2013 and 2023 using Pubmed and SagePub databases. Studies were included if they contained reports of the best timing for emergency surgery for CHD repair. We did not include review articles and unpublished data.
Results: Five articles met the criteria. The overall result, the first pre-operative 24-hour oxygenation index mean, was temporally reliable and representative (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.61-0.77). Within any severity level, there were no differences in 90-day survival or mortality rate between delayed repair and early repair (p = 0.002). As a result, there is no optimal timing for surgery in severe cases of CDH. A delay in repair did not predict an increased risk of death, nor did it suggest an increased need for post-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygen therapy.
Conclusion: Regardless of the severity of the illness, the timing of CDH repair does not affect the mortality rate.Surgery is done after the physiology index achievement.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.