意大利对无法切除的肝周胆管癌进行肝移植的经验:全国调查与未来展望。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01889-1
Enrico Gringeri, Alessandro Furlanetto, Ilaria Billato, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Renato Romagnoli, Paolo De Simone, Marco Vivarelli, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Matteo Ravaioli, Andrea Lauterio, Carlo Sposito, Damiano Patrono, Davide Ghinolfi, Federico Moccheggiani, Stefano Di Sandro, Francesco Enrico D'Amico, Jacopo Lanari, Martina Gambato, Silvia Trapani, Francesca Bergamo, Massimo Cardillo, Patrizia Burra, Umberto Cillo
{"title":"意大利对无法切除的肝周胆管癌进行肝移植的经验:全国调查与未来展望。","authors":"Enrico Gringeri, Alessandro Furlanetto, Ilaria Billato, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Renato Romagnoli, Paolo De Simone, Marco Vivarelli, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Matteo Ravaioli, Andrea Lauterio, Carlo Sposito, Damiano Patrono, Davide Ghinolfi, Federico Moccheggiani, Stefano Di Sandro, Francesco Enrico D'Amico, Jacopo Lanari, Martina Gambato, Silvia Trapani, Francesca Bergamo, Massimo Cardillo, Patrizia Burra, Umberto Cillo","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-01889-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplantation (LT) was considered an ineffective treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) until the successful experience of the Mayo Clinic, proposing a protocol with strict inclusion criteria and neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. Since 2015, pCCA is considered an indication for LT in Italy only in the context of controlled prospective studies. We performed a survey among the 22 Italian Liver Transplant Centers to assess the results of LT for pCCA. Eight centers reported 53 cases from 1986 to 2021 (Bologna 12, Padova 10, Niguarda 10, Milano Tumori 8, Torino 5, Pisa 4, Ancona 2, Modena 2). Patients were divided according to whether they recieved neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (Group 1, 25 cases) or not (Group 2, 28 cases). Eleven patients were transplanted without neoadjuvant treatment after 2015. Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83.8%, 56.6% and 50.6% in Group 1 and 72.4%, 41.4% and 35.5% in Gropu 2 (p = 0.13). Recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91.2%, 61.1% and 47.2% in Group 1 and 58.2%, 42.2%, and 36.1% in Group 2 (p = 0.16). A competing risk regression analysis showed a 5-year risk of cancer-related death of 19% for patients in Group 1 against 62.3% in Group 2, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (95%CI [0.10-0.98], p 0.047). This survey promoted a discussion about the limitations of the Mayo protocol and set the basis for the adoption of a new nationwide protocol (LITHALICA-NCT06125769), having the same inclusion criteria but proposing standard of care chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2505-2513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Italian experience on liver transplantation for unresectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a national survey and future perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Gringeri, Alessandro Furlanetto, Ilaria Billato, Matteo Cescon, Luciano De Carlis, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Renato Romagnoli, Paolo De Simone, Marco Vivarelli, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Matteo Ravaioli, Andrea Lauterio, Carlo Sposito, Damiano Patrono, Davide Ghinolfi, Federico Moccheggiani, Stefano Di Sandro, Francesco Enrico D'Amico, Jacopo Lanari, Martina Gambato, Silvia Trapani, Francesca Bergamo, Massimo Cardillo, Patrizia Burra, Umberto Cillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-024-01889-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Liver transplantation (LT) was considered an ineffective treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) until the successful experience of the Mayo Clinic, proposing a protocol with strict inclusion criteria and neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. Since 2015, pCCA is considered an indication for LT in Italy only in the context of controlled prospective studies. We performed a survey among the 22 Italian Liver Transplant Centers to assess the results of LT for pCCA. Eight centers reported 53 cases from 1986 to 2021 (Bologna 12, Padova 10, Niguarda 10, Milano Tumori 8, Torino 5, Pisa 4, Ancona 2, Modena 2). Patients were divided according to whether they recieved neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (Group 1, 25 cases) or not (Group 2, 28 cases). Eleven patients were transplanted without neoadjuvant treatment after 2015. Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83.8%, 56.6% and 50.6% in Group 1 and 72.4%, 41.4% and 35.5% in Gropu 2 (p = 0.13). Recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91.2%, 61.1% and 47.2% in Group 1 and 58.2%, 42.2%, and 36.1% in Group 2 (p = 0.16). A competing risk regression analysis showed a 5-year risk of cancer-related death of 19% for patients in Group 1 against 62.3% in Group 2, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (95%CI [0.10-0.98], p 0.047). This survey promoted a discussion about the limitations of the Mayo protocol and set the basis for the adoption of a new nationwide protocol (LITHALICA-NCT06125769), having the same inclusion criteria but proposing standard of care chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2505-2513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01889-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01889-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝移植(LT)一直被认为是治疗肝周胆管癌(pCCA)的无效方法,直到梅奥诊所的成功经验,提出了具有严格纳入标准和新辅助放射化疗的方案。自2015年起,在意大利,pCCA只有在前瞻性对照研究中才被视为LT的适应症。我们对 22 个意大利肝移植中心进行了调查,以评估 LT 治疗 pCCA 的结果。八个中心报告了 1986 年至 2021 年期间的 53 例病例(博洛尼亚 12 例、帕多瓦 10 例、尼瓜尔达 10 例、米兰图莫里 8 例、都灵 5 例、比萨 4 例、安科纳 2 例、摩德纳 2 例)。根据患者是否接受新辅助放射化疗(第1组,25例)(第2组,28例)进行划分。11名患者在2015年后未经新辅助治疗进行了移植。第1组1、3和5年总生存率分别为83.8%、56.6%和50.6%,第2组分别为72.4%、41.4%和35.5%(P = 0.13)。第 1 组 1、3 和 5 年的无复发生存率分别为 91.2%、61.1% 和 47.2%,第 2 组分别为 58.2%、42.2% 和 36.1%(P = 0.16)。竞争风险回归分析显示,第 1 组患者 5 年癌症相关死亡风险为 19%,第 2 组为 62.3%,危险比为 0.31(95%CI [0.10-0.98],P 0.047)。这项调查促进了对梅奥方案局限性的讨论,并为采用新的全国性方案(LITHALICA-NCT06125769)奠定了基础,该方案具有相同的纳入标准,但建议将标准护理化疗作为新辅助治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Italian experience on liver transplantation for unresectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a national survey and future perspectives.

The Italian experience on liver transplantation for unresectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a national survey and future perspectives.

Liver transplantation (LT) was considered an ineffective treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) until the successful experience of the Mayo Clinic, proposing a protocol with strict inclusion criteria and neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. Since 2015, pCCA is considered an indication for LT in Italy only in the context of controlled prospective studies. We performed a survey among the 22 Italian Liver Transplant Centers to assess the results of LT for pCCA. Eight centers reported 53 cases from 1986 to 2021 (Bologna 12, Padova 10, Niguarda 10, Milano Tumori 8, Torino 5, Pisa 4, Ancona 2, Modena 2). Patients were divided according to whether they recieved neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (Group 1, 25 cases) or not (Group 2, 28 cases). Eleven patients were transplanted without neoadjuvant treatment after 2015. Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83.8%, 56.6% and 50.6% in Group 1 and 72.4%, 41.4% and 35.5% in Gropu 2 (p = 0.13). Recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91.2%, 61.1% and 47.2% in Group 1 and 58.2%, 42.2%, and 36.1% in Group 2 (p = 0.16). A competing risk regression analysis showed a 5-year risk of cancer-related death of 19% for patients in Group 1 against 62.3% in Group 2, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (95%CI [0.10-0.98], p 0.047). This survey promoted a discussion about the limitations of the Mayo protocol and set the basis for the adoption of a new nationwide protocol (LITHALICA-NCT06125769), having the same inclusion criteria but proposing standard of care chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信