Hatem Nasr, Nejoud Alnajashi, Hussein Farghaly, Abdullah Alqarni
{"title":"18F FDG PET/CT 与 99m Tc MDP 骨闪烁成像在乳腺癌患者转移性骨病成像中的对比;根据血清标记物解决差异。","authors":"Hatem Nasr, Nejoud Alnajashi, Hussein Farghaly, Abdullah Alqarni","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the performance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) versus 99m Tc MDP bone scan in assessment of metastatic osseous disease in breast cancer patients in relation to serum markers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We reviewed PET/CT studies and bone scans for 37 patients (mean age of 55.38 ± 13.08 years) with metastatic breast cancer to bone. To assess metastatic osseous burden, we used semiquantitative scores derived from PET/CT (PMS) and bone scans (BMS). We used McNemar test to compare lesion detection between both modalities and receiver operator characteristic analysis to define the cutoff value of serum CA 15-3 that best predicts additional value for PET/CT over bone scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 13 patients (35.1%), more lesions or higher-intensity lesions were detected on PET/CT, while only 4 patients (10.8%) had more prominent lesions on bone scans ( P = 0.049). Additional lesions seen on PET/CT are predominantly osteolytic or medullary (early phase). Most lesions with higher uptake on bone scans appear sclerotic (late phase). CA 15-3 was positively correlated to PMS ( r = 0.386; P = 0.018) but not to BMS ( r = -0.027; P = 0.874). However, serum alkaline phosphatase was positively correlated to both PMS ( r = 0.389; P = 0.017) and BMS ( r = 0.363; P = 0.027). CA 15-3 value of >47 U/ml best predicted additional findings on PET/CT compared to bone scans (area under the curve = 0.708; P = 0.0261).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG PET/CT detects metastatic osseous lesions during an earlier phase. A higher CA 15-3 predicts a higher metastatic burden on PET/CT but not on bone scan. Bone scans are less specific, likely by missing early lesions and detecting persistent uptake in healing sclerotic lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":"947-957"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"18 F FDG PET/CT versus 99m Tc MDP Bone scintigraphy in imaging of metastatic osseous disease in breast cancer patients; Solving the discrepancies in light of serum markers.\",\"authors\":\"Hatem Nasr, Nejoud Alnajashi, Hussein Farghaly, Abdullah Alqarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the performance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) versus 99m Tc MDP bone scan in assessment of metastatic osseous disease in breast cancer patients in relation to serum markers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We reviewed PET/CT studies and bone scans for 37 patients (mean age of 55.38 ± 13.08 years) with metastatic breast cancer to bone. To assess metastatic osseous burden, we used semiquantitative scores derived from PET/CT (PMS) and bone scans (BMS). We used McNemar test to compare lesion detection between both modalities and receiver operator characteristic analysis to define the cutoff value of serum CA 15-3 that best predicts additional value for PET/CT over bone scan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 13 patients (35.1%), more lesions or higher-intensity lesions were detected on PET/CT, while only 4 patients (10.8%) had more prominent lesions on bone scans ( P = 0.049). Additional lesions seen on PET/CT are predominantly osteolytic or medullary (early phase). Most lesions with higher uptake on bone scans appear sclerotic (late phase). CA 15-3 was positively correlated to PMS ( r = 0.386; P = 0.018) but not to BMS ( r = -0.027; P = 0.874). However, serum alkaline phosphatase was positively correlated to both PMS ( r = 0.389; P = 0.017) and BMS ( r = 0.363; P = 0.027). CA 15-3 value of >47 U/ml best predicted additional findings on PET/CT compared to bone scans (area under the curve = 0.708; P = 0.0261).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG PET/CT detects metastatic osseous lesions during an earlier phase. A higher CA 15-3 predicts a higher metastatic burden on PET/CT but not on bone scan. Bone scans are less specific, likely by missing early lesions and detecting persistent uptake in healing sclerotic lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"947-957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001888\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
18 F FDG PET/CT versus 99m Tc MDP Bone scintigraphy in imaging of metastatic osseous disease in breast cancer patients; Solving the discrepancies in light of serum markers.
Aim: To assess the performance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) versus 99m Tc MDP bone scan in assessment of metastatic osseous disease in breast cancer patients in relation to serum markers.
Material and methods: We reviewed PET/CT studies and bone scans for 37 patients (mean age of 55.38 ± 13.08 years) with metastatic breast cancer to bone. To assess metastatic osseous burden, we used semiquantitative scores derived from PET/CT (PMS) and bone scans (BMS). We used McNemar test to compare lesion detection between both modalities and receiver operator characteristic analysis to define the cutoff value of serum CA 15-3 that best predicts additional value for PET/CT over bone scan.
Results: In 13 patients (35.1%), more lesions or higher-intensity lesions were detected on PET/CT, while only 4 patients (10.8%) had more prominent lesions on bone scans ( P = 0.049). Additional lesions seen on PET/CT are predominantly osteolytic or medullary (early phase). Most lesions with higher uptake on bone scans appear sclerotic (late phase). CA 15-3 was positively correlated to PMS ( r = 0.386; P = 0.018) but not to BMS ( r = -0.027; P = 0.874). However, serum alkaline phosphatase was positively correlated to both PMS ( r = 0.389; P = 0.017) and BMS ( r = 0.363; P = 0.027). CA 15-3 value of >47 U/ml best predicted additional findings on PET/CT compared to bone scans (area under the curve = 0.708; P = 0.0261).
Conclusion: FDG PET/CT detects metastatic osseous lesions during an earlier phase. A higher CA 15-3 predicts a higher metastatic burden on PET/CT but not on bone scan. Bone scans are less specific, likely by missing early lesions and detecting persistent uptake in healing sclerotic lesions.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.