全血复苏对院内死亡率的影响:对在一级创伤中心接受治疗的患者进行倾向得分加权分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pawan Acharya, Tabitha Garwe, Sara K Vesely, Amanda Janitz, Jennifer D Peck, Amanda Celii
{"title":"全血复苏对院内死亡率的影响:对在一级创伤中心接受治疗的患者进行倾向得分加权分析。","authors":"Pawan Acharya, Tabitha Garwe, Sara K Vesely, Amanda Janitz, Jennifer D Peck, Amanda Celii","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol-activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification (p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30-1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of whole blood resuscitation on in-hospital mortality: A propensity score weighted analysis of patients treated at a Level I trauma center.\",\"authors\":\"Pawan Acharya, Tabitha Garwe, Sara K Vesely, Amanda Janitz, Jennifer D Peck, Amanda Celii\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol-activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification (p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30-1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic; Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004438\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004438","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与血液成分疗法(CT)相比,全血(WB)输注在军队人群中的疗效更佳。然而,这种情况是否适用于平民仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在确定输血对短期院内预后的影响:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间在一级创伤中心接受 WB 或 CT 大量输血治疗的创伤患者。主要结果是院内死亡率,次要结果包括 24 小时死亡率、7 天死亡率、30 天死亡率、创伤诱发的凝血病和所需输血次数。采用倾向加权修正泊松回归法评估了输血类型对患者预后的影响:结果:在 1027 名启动大量输血方案的患者中,480 人(46.8%)接受了任何 WB。倾向得分加权平衡了输血组之间的协变量分布。观察到损伤类型(钝性损伤与穿透性损伤)对死亡率结果的显著影响(p < 0.05)。与接受 CT 的患者相比,接受 WB 的穿透性创伤患者院内(风险比 [RR],0.36;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.15-0.89)、7 天(RR,0.37;95% CI,0.15-0.94)和 30 天(RR,0.36;95% CI,0.15-0.89)死亡率的调整后风险显著降低,但 24 小时死亡率(RR,0.39;95% CI,0.15-1.00;P = 0.05)并无显著差异。与 CT 受者相比,钝性创伤的 WB 受者发生创伤诱发凝血病的风险较高(RR,1.59;95% CI,1.07-2.36),但穿透性损伤患者发生创伤诱发凝血病的风险不高(RR,0.65;95% CI,0.30-1.40)。与接受 CT 的患者相比,接受 WB 的患者在穿透性损伤(RR,0.59;95% CI,0.36-0.95)和钝器相关损伤(RR,0.73;95% CI,0.58-0.91)中的输血率均有所降低:结论:WB 对院内死亡率的影响因损伤类型而异,这表明有必要将穿透性损伤作为 WB 复苏的一个重要指征。此外,WB 可减少两种损伤类型的输血需求,从而降低患者的输血风险:证据级别:治疗;III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of whole blood resuscitation on in-hospital mortality: A propensity score weighted analysis of patients treated at a Level I trauma center.

Background: Whole blood (WB) transfusion, compared with blood component therapy (CT), has been shown to have superior outcomes in the military population. However, whether this translates to the civilian population remains understudied. This study sought to determine the effect of WB on short-term in-hospital outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included trauma patients at a Level I trauma center who received either WB or CT upon massive transfusion protocol activation between January 2021 and June 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included 24-hour mortality, 7-day mortality, 30-day mortality, trauma-induced coagulopathy, and the number of transfusion events required. The effect of transfusion type on patient outcomes was evaluated using a propensity-weighted modified Poisson regression.

Results: Of 1,027 massive transfusion protocol-activated patients, 480 (46.8%) received any WB. The propensity score weighting balanced the covariate distribution between the transfusion groups. Significant effect modification (p < 0.05) by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) on mortality outcomes was observed. Compared with CT recipients, penetrating trauma patients who received WB had a significantly lower adjusted risk of in-hospital (risk ratio [RR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.89), 7-day (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94), and 30-day (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89) mortality but not significantly different 24-hour mortality (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.15-1.00; p = 0.05). An elevated risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy was observed among WB recipients than CT recipients with blunt trauma (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.36) but not among patients with penetrating injury (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30-1.40). Compared with CT recipients, WB recipients had reduced transfusion rates for both penetrating (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.95) and blunt-related injuries (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91).

Conclusion: The effect of WB on in-hospital mortality is modified by injury type, suggesting the need to consider penetrating injury as an important indication for WB resuscitation. In addition, WB reduces transfusion requirements across both injury types, decreasing patient exposure to transfusion events.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic; Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信