拉丁美洲根除幽门螺旋杆菌标准三联疗法的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Dahiana M Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier A Bustamante-Rengifo, Herney A García-Perdomo
{"title":"拉丁美洲根除幽门螺旋杆菌标准三联疗法的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Dahiana M Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier A Bustamante-Rengifo, Herney A García-Perdomo","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard triple therapy (STT) in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Helicobacter pylori infection affects more than 50% of the Latin Americans and leads to gastric mucosa damage. Scarce data on effective therapeutic approaches in the region underscores the need for comprehensive information.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>The analysis included Randomized Controlled Trials published up to the year 2020, comparing STT with other treatments. Cumulative relative risks (RR) were estimated, with 95% CI, according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies (clinical trials conducted between 1995 and 2013), revealed cumulative eradication rates of 78.31-90.63% (ITT) and 76.71-93.55% (PP). The eradication with the STT was superior to sequential therapy (ITT-RR: 10.6, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12) (PP-RR: 10.6, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) and dual therapy (ITT-RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.13-2.30) (PP-RR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.25-2.37), but is less effective than other triple therapies (PP-RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-092). Regarding adverse effects, diarrhea, metallic taste, nausea, vomiting, and headache were the most common symptoms across treatments. Abdominal pain was associated with STT (ITT-RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STT was a safe regimen but with acceptable efficacy (most eradication rates <90%). Due to rising clarithromycin resistance, the study suggests avoiding STT as a first-line treatment. These results must be considered with caution due to the low representativeness of several Latin American countries and the lack of recent high-quality randomized studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Standard Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dahiana M Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier A Bustamante-Rengifo, Herney A García-Perdomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard triple therapy (STT) in Latin America.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Helicobacter pylori infection affects more than 50% of the Latin Americans and leads to gastric mucosa damage. Scarce data on effective therapeutic approaches in the region underscores the need for comprehensive information.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>The analysis included Randomized Controlled Trials published up to the year 2020, comparing STT with other treatments. Cumulative relative risks (RR) were estimated, with 95% CI, according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies (clinical trials conducted between 1995 and 2013), revealed cumulative eradication rates of 78.31-90.63% (ITT) and 76.71-93.55% (PP). The eradication with the STT was superior to sequential therapy (ITT-RR: 10.6, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12) (PP-RR: 10.6, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) and dual therapy (ITT-RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.13-2.30) (PP-RR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.25-2.37), but is less effective than other triple therapies (PP-RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-092). Regarding adverse effects, diarrhea, metallic taste, nausea, vomiting, and headache were the most common symptoms across treatments. Abdominal pain was associated with STT (ITT-RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STT was a safe regimen but with acceptable efficacy (most eradication rates <90%). Due to rising clarithromycin resistance, the study suggests avoiding STT as a first-line treatment. These results must be considered with caution due to the low representativeness of several Latin American countries and the lack of recent high-quality randomized studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估拉丁美洲标准三联疗法(STT)的疗效和安全性:评估拉丁美洲标准三联疗法(STT)的有效性和安全性:背景:50%以上的拉美人受到幽门螺杆菌感染,并导致胃黏膜损伤。该地区有效治疗方法的数据稀缺,因此需要全面的信息:分析包括截至 2020 年发表的随机对照试验,比较了 STT 与其他治疗方法。根据意向治疗(ITT)和按方案(PP)分析,估算了累积相对风险(RR)和 95% CI:11项研究(1995年至2013年间进行的临床试验)显示,累计根除率为78.31%-90.63%(ITT)和76.71%-93.55%(PP)。STT 的根除率优于序贯疗法(ITT-RR:10.6,95% CI:1.01-1.12)(PP-RR:10.6,95% CI:1.02-1.11)和双重疗法(ITT-RR:1.61,95% CI:1.13-2.30)(PP-RR:1.72,95% CI:1.25-2.37),但不如其他三联疗法有效(PP-RR:0.85,95% CI:0.78-092)。关于不良反应,腹泻、金属味、恶心、呕吐和头痛是各种疗法中最常见的症状。腹痛与 STT 有关(ITT-RR:1.75,95% CI:1.07-2.86):STT 是一种安全的治疗方案,但疗效尚可(大多数根除率为 90%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Standard Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Goals: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standard triple therapy (STT) in Latin America.

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection affects more than 50% of the Latin Americans and leads to gastric mucosa damage. Scarce data on effective therapeutic approaches in the region underscores the need for comprehensive information.

Study: The analysis included Randomized Controlled Trials published up to the year 2020, comparing STT with other treatments. Cumulative relative risks (RR) were estimated, with 95% CI, according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis.

Results: Eleven studies (clinical trials conducted between 1995 and 2013), revealed cumulative eradication rates of 78.31-90.63% (ITT) and 76.71-93.55% (PP). The eradication with the STT was superior to sequential therapy (ITT-RR: 10.6, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12) (PP-RR: 10.6, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) and dual therapy (ITT-RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.13-2.30) (PP-RR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.25-2.37), but is less effective than other triple therapies (PP-RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-092). Regarding adverse effects, diarrhea, metallic taste, nausea, vomiting, and headache were the most common symptoms across treatments. Abdominal pain was associated with STT (ITT-RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.86).

Conclusion: STT was a safe regimen but with acceptable efficacy (most eradication rates <90%). Due to rising clarithromycin resistance, the study suggests avoiding STT as a first-line treatment. These results must be considered with caution due to the low representativeness of several Latin American countries and the lack of recent high-quality randomized studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信