街头同伴外展工作者在实践中减少伤害的定性探索。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jill Owczarzak, Emily Martin, Noelle Weicker, Imogen Evans, Miles Morris, Susan G Sherman
{"title":"街头同伴外展工作者在实践中减少伤害的定性探索。","authors":"Jill Owczarzak, Emily Martin, Noelle Weicker, Imogen Evans, Miles Morris, Susan G Sherman","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01076-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread use of the phrase \"harm reduction\" and the proliferation of programs based on its principles during the current opioid epidemic, what it means in practice is not universally agreed upon. Harm reduction strategies have expanded from syringe and needle exchange programs that emerged in the mid-1980s primarily in response to the HIV epidemic, to include medication for opioid use disorder, supervised consumption rooms, naloxone distribution, and drug checking technologies such as fentanyl test strips. Harm reduction can often be in tension with abstinence and recovery models to address substance use, and people who use drugs may also hold competing views of what harm reduction means in practice. Street-based outreach workers are increasingly incorporated into harm reduction programs as part of efforts to engage with people more fully in various stages of drug use and nonuse.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This paper explores how peer outreach workers, called \"members,\" in a street-based naloxone distribution program define and practice harm reduction. We interviewed 15 members of a street-based harm reduction organization in an urban center characterized by an enduring opioid epidemic. Inductive data analysis explored harm reduction as both a set of principles and a set of practices to understand how frontline providers define and enact them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed that when members talked about their work, they often conceptualized harm reduction as a collection of ways members and others can \"save lives\" and support people who use drugs. They also framed harm reduction as part of a \"path toward recovery.\" This path was complicated and nonlinear but pursued a common goal of life without drug use and its residual effects. These findings suggest the need to develop harm reduction programs that incorporate both harm reduction and recovery to best meet the needs of people who use drugs and align with the value systems of implementers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative exploration of harm reduction in practice by street-based peer outreach workers.\",\"authors\":\"Jill Owczarzak, Emily Martin, Noelle Weicker, Imogen Evans, Miles Morris, Susan G Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-024-01076-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread use of the phrase \\\"harm reduction\\\" and the proliferation of programs based on its principles during the current opioid epidemic, what it means in practice is not universally agreed upon. Harm reduction strategies have expanded from syringe and needle exchange programs that emerged in the mid-1980s primarily in response to the HIV epidemic, to include medication for opioid use disorder, supervised consumption rooms, naloxone distribution, and drug checking technologies such as fentanyl test strips. Harm reduction can often be in tension with abstinence and recovery models to address substance use, and people who use drugs may also hold competing views of what harm reduction means in practice. Street-based outreach workers are increasingly incorporated into harm reduction programs as part of efforts to engage with people more fully in various stages of drug use and nonuse.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This paper explores how peer outreach workers, called \\\"members,\\\" in a street-based naloxone distribution program define and practice harm reduction. We interviewed 15 members of a street-based harm reduction organization in an urban center characterized by an enduring opioid epidemic. Inductive data analysis explored harm reduction as both a set of principles and a set of practices to understand how frontline providers define and enact them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed that when members talked about their work, they often conceptualized harm reduction as a collection of ways members and others can \\\"save lives\\\" and support people who use drugs. They also framed harm reduction as part of a \\\"path toward recovery.\\\" This path was complicated and nonlinear but pursued a common goal of life without drug use and its residual effects. These findings suggest the need to develop harm reduction programs that incorporate both harm reduction and recovery to best meet the needs of people who use drugs and align with the value systems of implementers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01076-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01076-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管 "减少伤害 "这一短语被广泛使用,而且在当前阿片类药物流行的过程中,基于其原则的项目也在激增,但它在实践中的含义并没有得到普遍认同。减少危害战略已经从 20 世纪 80 年代中期出现的主要应对艾滋病流行的注射器和针头交换计划扩展到包括治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物、监督消费室、纳洛酮分发以及芬太尼试纸等药物检查技术。减低危害往往与禁欲和康复模式在解决药物使用问题上存在矛盾,而吸毒者也可能对减低危害的实际意义持有不同的观点。街头外展工作者越来越多地被纳入到减低危害项目中,作为与处于不同吸毒和不吸毒阶段的人们进行更全面接触的努力的一部分:本文探讨了街头纳洛酮发放项目中被称为 "成员 "的同伴外展工作者是如何定义和实践减低危害的。我们在一个阿片类药物持续流行的城市中心,采访了一个街头减低伤害组织的 15 名成员。归纳式数据分析探讨了减低伤害的原则和实践,以了解一线提供者如何定义和实施这些原则和实践:分析表明,当成员们谈到他们的工作时,他们通常将减低伤害概念化为成员和其他人可以 "拯救生命 "和支持吸毒者的一系列方法。他们还将减低危害视为 "康复之路 "的一部分。这条道路是复杂的、非线性的,但追求的是一个共同的目标,即没有毒品使用及其残余影响的生活。这些研究结果表明,有必要制定同时包含减低伤害和康复的减低伤害计划,以最大限度地满足吸毒者的需求,并与实施者的价值体系保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative exploration of harm reduction in practice by street-based peer outreach workers.

Background: Despite the widespread use of the phrase "harm reduction" and the proliferation of programs based on its principles during the current opioid epidemic, what it means in practice is not universally agreed upon. Harm reduction strategies have expanded from syringe and needle exchange programs that emerged in the mid-1980s primarily in response to the HIV epidemic, to include medication for opioid use disorder, supervised consumption rooms, naloxone distribution, and drug checking technologies such as fentanyl test strips. Harm reduction can often be in tension with abstinence and recovery models to address substance use, and people who use drugs may also hold competing views of what harm reduction means in practice. Street-based outreach workers are increasingly incorporated into harm reduction programs as part of efforts to engage with people more fully in various stages of drug use and nonuse.

Method: This paper explores how peer outreach workers, called "members," in a street-based naloxone distribution program define and practice harm reduction. We interviewed 15 members of a street-based harm reduction organization in an urban center characterized by an enduring opioid epidemic. Inductive data analysis explored harm reduction as both a set of principles and a set of practices to understand how frontline providers define and enact them.

Results: Analysis revealed that when members talked about their work, they often conceptualized harm reduction as a collection of ways members and others can "save lives" and support people who use drugs. They also framed harm reduction as part of a "path toward recovery." This path was complicated and nonlinear but pursued a common goal of life without drug use and its residual effects. These findings suggest the need to develop harm reduction programs that incorporate both harm reduction and recovery to best meet the needs of people who use drugs and align with the value systems of implementers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信