L3 椎骨经骨膜断裂后短节后方器械的载荷变化 - 一项人体尸体生物力学研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maximilian Heumann, Alina Jacob, Boyko Gueorguiev, R Geoff Richards, Lorin M Benneker
{"title":"L3 椎骨经骨膜断裂后短节后方器械的载荷变化 - 一项人体尸体生物力学研究。","authors":"Maximilian Heumann, Alina Jacob, Boyko Gueorguiev, R Geoff Richards, Lorin M Benneker","doi":"10.1177/21925682241282276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Following the successful use of a novel implantable sensor (Monitor) in evaluating the progression of fracture healing in long bones and posterolateral fusion of the spine based on implant load monitoring, the aim of this study was to investigate its potential to assess healing of transosseous fractures of a lumbar vertebra stabilized with a pedicle-screw-rod construct.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six human cadaveric spines were instrumented with pedicle screws and rods spanning L3 vertebra. The spine was loaded in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral-Bending (LB) and Axial-Rotation (AR) with an intact L3 vertebra and after its transosseous disruption, creating an AO B1 type fracture. The implant load was measured on the one rod using the Monitor and on the contralateral rod by strain gauges to validate the Monitor's measurements. In parallel, the range of motion (ROM) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROM increased significantly in all directions in the fractured model (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.049). The Monitor measured a significant increase in implant load in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.045), however, not in AR. The strain gauge - aligned with the rod axis and glued onto its posterior side - detected an increased implant load not only in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.016) but also in AR (<i>P</i> = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After a complete transosseous disruption of L3 vertebra, the implant load on the rods was considerably higher vs the state with an intact vertebral body. Innovative implantable sensors could monitor those changes, allowing assessment of the healing progression based on quantifiable data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load Changes on a Short-Segment Posterior Instrumentation After Transosseous Disruption of L3 Vertebra - A Biomechanical Human Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Heumann, Alina Jacob, Boyko Gueorguiev, R Geoff Richards, Lorin M Benneker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241282276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Following the successful use of a novel implantable sensor (Monitor) in evaluating the progression of fracture healing in long bones and posterolateral fusion of the spine based on implant load monitoring, the aim of this study was to investigate its potential to assess healing of transosseous fractures of a lumbar vertebra stabilized with a pedicle-screw-rod construct.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six human cadaveric spines were instrumented with pedicle screws and rods spanning L3 vertebra. The spine was loaded in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral-Bending (LB) and Axial-Rotation (AR) with an intact L3 vertebra and after its transosseous disruption, creating an AO B1 type fracture. The implant load was measured on the one rod using the Monitor and on the contralateral rod by strain gauges to validate the Monitor's measurements. In parallel, the range of motion (ROM) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ROM increased significantly in all directions in the fractured model (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.049). The Monitor measured a significant increase in implant load in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.045), however, not in AR. The strain gauge - aligned with the rod axis and glued onto its posterior side - detected an increased implant load not only in FE (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and LB (<i>P</i> = 0.016) but also in AR (<i>P</i> = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After a complete transosseous disruption of L3 vertebra, the implant load on the rods was considerably higher vs the state with an intact vertebral body. Innovative implantable sensors could monitor those changes, allowing assessment of the healing progression based on quantifiable data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241282276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241282276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计生物力学尸体研究:继成功使用新型植入式传感器(监测器)根据植入物载荷监测评估长骨骨折愈合和脊柱后外侧融合的进展之后,本研究的目的是调查其在评估用椎弓根螺钉连杆结构稳定的腰椎跨骨骨折愈合方面的潜力:方法:用椎弓根螺钉和横跨 L3 椎体的螺杆对六具人体尸体的脊柱进行固定。在L3椎体完好无损的情况下,以及经骨膜断裂造成AO B1型骨折后,对脊柱进行屈伸(FE)、侧弯(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)加载。使用监控器测量一根杆上的植入物载荷,并使用应变片测量对侧杆上的植入物载荷,以验证监控器的测量结果。同时,还对活动范围(ROM)进行了评估:结果:骨折模型在所有方向上的活动范围都有明显增加(P ≤ 0.049)。监测仪测得 FE(P = 0.002)和 LB(P = 0.045)植入载荷明显增加,但 AR 没有增加。应变计与杆轴对齐,粘贴在杆的后侧,不仅在FE(P = 0.001)和LB(P = 0.016)检测到种植体负荷增加,而且在AR(P = 0.047)也检测到种植体负荷增加:结论:L3椎体完全经骨破坏后,与椎体完好的状态相比,植入棒上的负荷要高得多。创新的植入式传感器可以监测这些变化,从而根据可量化的数据评估愈合进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Load Changes on a Short-Segment Posterior Instrumentation After Transosseous Disruption of L3 Vertebra - A Biomechanical Human Cadaveric Study.

Study design: Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

Objectives: Following the successful use of a novel implantable sensor (Monitor) in evaluating the progression of fracture healing in long bones and posterolateral fusion of the spine based on implant load monitoring, the aim of this study was to investigate its potential to assess healing of transosseous fractures of a lumbar vertebra stabilized with a pedicle-screw-rod construct.

Methods: Six human cadaveric spines were instrumented with pedicle screws and rods spanning L3 vertebra. The spine was loaded in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral-Bending (LB) and Axial-Rotation (AR) with an intact L3 vertebra and after its transosseous disruption, creating an AO B1 type fracture. The implant load was measured on the one rod using the Monitor and on the contralateral rod by strain gauges to validate the Monitor's measurements. In parallel, the range of motion (ROM) was assessed.

Results: ROM increased significantly in all directions in the fractured model (P ≤ 0.049). The Monitor measured a significant increase in implant load in FE (P = 0.002) and LB (P = 0.045), however, not in AR. The strain gauge - aligned with the rod axis and glued onto its posterior side - detected an increased implant load not only in FE (P = 0.001) and LB (P = 0.016) but also in AR (P = 0.047).

Conclusion: After a complete transosseous disruption of L3 vertebra, the implant load on the rods was considerably higher vs the state with an intact vertebral body. Innovative implantable sensors could monitor those changes, allowing assessment of the healing progression based on quantifiable data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信