过乙酸对光刺激荧光板的消毒效果

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Débora Costa Ruiz, Thaís Santos Cerqueira Ocampo, Eduardo Martinelli Franco, Iago Filipe Correia-Dantas, Renata de Oliveira Mattos-Graner, Francisco Haiter-Neto, Deborah Queiroz Freitas
{"title":"过乙酸对光刺激荧光板的消毒效果","authors":"Débora Costa Ruiz, Thaís Santos Cerqueira Ocampo, Eduardo Martinelli Franco, Iago Filipe Correia-Dantas, Renata de Oliveira Mattos-Graner, Francisco Haiter-Neto, Deborah Queiroz Freitas","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of white vinegar, acetic acid, and peracetic acid on photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates disinfection, and to assess the disinfectant influence on the radiographic quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight PSP plates (Express system) were contaminated with Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. These plates were wiped with tissues without any substance, with white vinegar, acetic acid, and peracetic acid, followed by an agar imprint. Number of microbial colonies formed was recorded. Afterwards, the quality of radiographs was tested using the more efficient disinfectant. Before disinfection and after every five disinfections, two radiographs of an acrylic-block and two radiographs of an aluminium step-wedge were acquired for each plate. Density, noise, uniformity, and contrast were analysed. Three oral radiologists evaluated the images for the presence of artefacts. One-way analysis of variance compared changes on grey values among the disinfections (α = .05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for the presence of artefacts was calculated by weighted Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peracetic acid was the only one that eliminated both microorganisms. Density and uniformity decreased after 100 disinfections, and contrast changed without a pattern in the course of disinfections (P ≤ .05). Small artefacts were observed after 30 disinfections. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were almost perfect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disinfection with peracetic acid eliminated both microorganisms. However, it also affected density, uniformity, and contrast of radiographs, and led to the formation of small artefacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peracetic acid efficacy on disinfection of photostimulable phosphor plates.\",\"authors\":\"Débora Costa Ruiz, Thaís Santos Cerqueira Ocampo, Eduardo Martinelli Franco, Iago Filipe Correia-Dantas, Renata de Oliveira Mattos-Graner, Francisco Haiter-Neto, Deborah Queiroz Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of white vinegar, acetic acid, and peracetic acid on photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates disinfection, and to assess the disinfectant influence on the radiographic quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight PSP plates (Express system) were contaminated with Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. These plates were wiped with tissues without any substance, with white vinegar, acetic acid, and peracetic acid, followed by an agar imprint. Number of microbial colonies formed was recorded. Afterwards, the quality of radiographs was tested using the more efficient disinfectant. Before disinfection and after every five disinfections, two radiographs of an acrylic-block and two radiographs of an aluminium step-wedge were acquired for each plate. Density, noise, uniformity, and contrast were analysed. Three oral radiologists evaluated the images for the presence of artefacts. One-way analysis of variance compared changes on grey values among the disinfections (α = .05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for the presence of artefacts was calculated by weighted Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peracetic acid was the only one that eliminated both microorganisms. Density and uniformity decreased after 100 disinfections, and contrast changed without a pattern in the course of disinfections (P ≤ .05). Small artefacts were observed after 30 disinfections. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were almost perfect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disinfection with peracetic acid eliminated both microorganisms. However, it also affected density, uniformity, and contrast of radiographs, and led to the formation of small artefacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"542-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估白醋、醋酸和过氧乙酸对光敏荧光板(PSP)消毒的抗菌效果,并评估消毒剂对射线质量的影响:方法:8 块 PSP 平板(Express 系统)被变异链球菌和白色念珠菌污染。用不含任何物质的纸巾、白醋、醋酸和过氧乙酸擦拭这些平板,然后用琼脂印迹。记录形成的微生物菌落数。之后,使用更有效的消毒剂检测射线照片的质量。在消毒前和每五次消毒后,为每个平板分别采集两张丙烯酸块和两张铝制阶梯楔的射线照片。对密度、噪音、均匀度和对比度进行了分析。三名口腔放射科医生对图像是否存在伪影进行了评估。单因素方差分析比较了不同消毒方法灰度值的变化(α = 0.05)。通过加权卡帕计算检查者内部和检查者之间对是否存在伪影的一致性:结果:过氧乙酸是唯一能消除两种微生物的消毒剂。密度和均匀度在 100 次消毒后下降,对比度在消毒过程中无规律变化(P ≤ 0.05)。消毒 30 次后,可观察到小的伪影。检查者内部和检查者之间几乎完全一致:结论:过氧乙酸消毒可消除两种微生物。结论:过氧乙酸消毒可消除两种微生物,但也会影响射线照片的密度、均匀性和对比度,并导致形成小的伪影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peracetic acid efficacy on disinfection of photostimulable phosphor plates.

Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of white vinegar, acetic acid, and peracetic acid on photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates disinfection, and to assess the disinfectant influence on the radiographic quality.

Methods: Eight PSP plates (Express system) were contaminated with Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. These plates were wiped with tissues without any substance, with white vinegar, acetic acid, and peracetic acid, followed by an agar imprint. Number of microbial colonies formed was recorded. Afterwards, the quality of radiographs was tested using the more efficient disinfectant. Before disinfection and after every five disinfections, two radiographs of an acrylic-block and two radiographs of an aluminium step-wedge were acquired for each plate. Density, noise, uniformity, and contrast were analysed. Three oral radiologists evaluated the images for the presence of artefacts. One-way analysis of variance compared changes on grey values among the disinfections (α = .05). Intra- and inter-examiner agreement for the presence of artefacts was calculated by weighted Kappa.

Results: Peracetic acid was the only one that eliminated both microorganisms. Density and uniformity decreased after 100 disinfections, and contrast changed without a pattern in the course of disinfections (P ≤ .05). Small artefacts were observed after 30 disinfections. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were almost perfect.

Conclusions: Disinfection with peracetic acid eliminated both microorganisms. However, it also affected density, uniformity, and contrast of radiographs, and led to the formation of small artefacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信