几何校正对基于回声平面成像的腹部放射治疗表观扩散系数图的影响。

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Signe Winther Hasler, Uffe Bernchou, Claus P Behrens, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Anne L H Bisgaard, Minea Jokivuolle, Anders Bertelsen, Tine Schytte, Carsten Brink, Faisal Mahmood
{"title":"几何校正对基于回声平面成像的腹部放射治疗表观扩散系数图的影响。","authors":"Signe Winther Hasler, Uffe Bernchou, Claus P Behrens, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Anne L H Bisgaard, Minea Jokivuolle, Anders Bertelsen, Tine Schytte, Carsten Brink, Faisal Mahmood","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ad7597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) extracted from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a potential biomarker in radiotherapy (RT). DWI is often implemented with an Echo-planar imaging (EPI) read-out due to speed, but unfortunately low geometric accuracy follows. This study aimed to investigate the influence of geometric distortions on the ADCs extracted from the gross tumor volume (GTV) and on the shape of the GTV in abdominal EPI-DWI. &#xD;Approach: Twenty-one patients had EPI-DWI scans on a 1.5 T MRI sim before treatment and on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac at one of the first treatment fractions. Off-resonance correction with and without eddy current correction were applied to ADC maps. The clinical GTVs were deformed based on the same (but inverted) corrections to assess the local-regional geometric influence of distortions. Mean surface distance (MSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were calculated to compare the original and distorted GTVs, and ADC values were calculated based on a mono-exponential model. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the applied correction method. &#xD;Main results: The median (range) ADC change within the GTV after full distortion correction was 1.3% (0.02-6.9%) for MRI-Sim and 1.5% (0.1-6.4%) for MRI-Linac. The additional effect of the eddy current correction was small in both systems. The median (range) MSD, HD, and DSC comparing the original and off-resonance distorted GTVs for all patients were 0.43 mm (0.11-0.94 mm), 4.00 mm (1.00-7.81 mm) and 0.93 (0.82-0.99), respectively.&#xD;Significance: Overall effect of distortion correction was small in terms of derived ADC values, indicating that distortion correction is unimportant for prediction of outcomes based on ADC. However, large local geometric changes occurred after off-resonance distortion correction for some patients, suggesting that if the spatial information from ADC maps is to be used for dose painting strategies, corrections should be applied.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of geometric correction on echo-planar imaging-based apparent diffusion coefficient maps for abdominal radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Signe Winther Hasler, Uffe Bernchou, Claus P Behrens, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Anne L H Bisgaard, Minea Jokivuolle, Anders Bertelsen, Tine Schytte, Carsten Brink, Faisal Mahmood\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/ad7597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) extracted from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a potential biomarker in radiotherapy (RT). DWI is often implemented with an Echo-planar imaging (EPI) read-out due to speed, but unfortunately low geometric accuracy follows. This study aimed to investigate the influence of geometric distortions on the ADCs extracted from the gross tumor volume (GTV) and on the shape of the GTV in abdominal EPI-DWI. &#xD;Approach: Twenty-one patients had EPI-DWI scans on a 1.5 T MRI sim before treatment and on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac at one of the first treatment fractions. Off-resonance correction with and without eddy current correction were applied to ADC maps. The clinical GTVs were deformed based on the same (but inverted) corrections to assess the local-regional geometric influence of distortions. Mean surface distance (MSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were calculated to compare the original and distorted GTVs, and ADC values were calculated based on a mono-exponential model. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the applied correction method. &#xD;Main results: The median (range) ADC change within the GTV after full distortion correction was 1.3% (0.02-6.9%) for MRI-Sim and 1.5% (0.1-6.4%) for MRI-Linac. The additional effect of the eddy current correction was small in both systems. The median (range) MSD, HD, and DSC comparing the original and off-resonance distorted GTVs for all patients were 0.43 mm (0.11-0.94 mm), 4.00 mm (1.00-7.81 mm) and 0.93 (0.82-0.99), respectively.&#xD;Significance: Overall effect of distortion correction was small in terms of derived ADC values, indicating that distortion correction is unimportant for prediction of outcomes based on ADC. However, large local geometric changes occurred after off-resonance distortion correction for some patients, suggesting that if the spatial information from ADC maps is to be used for dose painting strategies, corrections should be applied.&#xD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从弥散加权磁共振成像(DWI)中提取的表观弥散系数(ADC)是放射治疗(RT)的潜在生物标志物。由于速度快,DWI 通常使用回声平面成像(EPI)读出,但不幸的是,几何精度较低。本研究旨在探讨几何失真对腹部 EPI-DWI 中从肿瘤总体积(GTV)提取的 ADCs 以及 GTV 形状的影响:21 名患者在治疗前在 1.5 T MRI sim 上进行了 EPI-DWI 扫描,并在第一次治疗分段时在 1.5 T MRI-Linac 上进行了扫描。对 ADC 图进行了带或不带涡流校正的非共振校正。临床 GTV 根据相同(但倒置)的校正进行变形,以评估变形对局部区域几何的影响。计算平均表面距离(MSD)、豪斯多夫距离(HD)和戴斯相似系数(DSC),以比较原始和变形的 GTV,并根据单指数模型计算 ADC 值。为了验证所应用的校正方法,还进行了模型测量:完全畸变校正后,MRI-Sim 和 MRI-Linac GTV 内 ADC 变化的中位数(范围)分别为 1.3% (0.02-6.9%)和 1.5% (0.1-6.4%)。涡流校正对这两种系统的额外影响都很小。所有患者的原始和非共振畸变 GTV 的 MSD、HD 和 DSC 比较中位数(范围)分别为 0.43 毫米(0.11-0.94 毫米)、4.00 毫米(1.00-7.81 毫米)和 0.93(0.82-0.99):就得出的 ADC 值而言,畸变校正的总体影响较小,这表明畸变校正对于根据 ADC 预测结果并不重要。然而,一些患者在进行非共振失真校正后出现了较大的局部几何变化,这表明如果要将 ADC 图的空间信息用于剂量绘制策略,则应进行校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of geometric correction on echo-planar imaging-based apparent diffusion coefficient maps for abdominal radiotherapy.

Objective: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) extracted from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a potential biomarker in radiotherapy (RT). DWI is often implemented with an Echo-planar imaging (EPI) read-out due to speed, but unfortunately low geometric accuracy follows. This study aimed to investigate the influence of geometric distortions on the ADCs extracted from the gross tumor volume (GTV) and on the shape of the GTV in abdominal EPI-DWI. Approach: Twenty-one patients had EPI-DWI scans on a 1.5 T MRI sim before treatment and on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac at one of the first treatment fractions. Off-resonance correction with and without eddy current correction were applied to ADC maps. The clinical GTVs were deformed based on the same (but inverted) corrections to assess the local-regional geometric influence of distortions. Mean surface distance (MSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were calculated to compare the original and distorted GTVs, and ADC values were calculated based on a mono-exponential model. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the applied correction method. Main results: The median (range) ADC change within the GTV after full distortion correction was 1.3% (0.02-6.9%) for MRI-Sim and 1.5% (0.1-6.4%) for MRI-Linac. The additional effect of the eddy current correction was small in both systems. The median (range) MSD, HD, and DSC comparing the original and off-resonance distorted GTVs for all patients were 0.43 mm (0.11-0.94 mm), 4.00 mm (1.00-7.81 mm) and 0.93 (0.82-0.99), respectively. Significance: Overall effect of distortion correction was small in terms of derived ADC values, indicating that distortion correction is unimportant for prediction of outcomes based on ADC. However, large local geometric changes occurred after off-resonance distortion correction for some patients, suggesting that if the spatial information from ADC maps is to be used for dose painting strategies, corrections should be applied. .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信