早期食管胃腺癌恶性结节累及的患病率和风险因素:多中心回顾性大会研究(早期食管胃癌的镜下切除术、食管切除术或胃切除术)的结果。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496
Philip H Pucher, Saqib A Rahman, Pradeep Bhandari, Natalie Blencowe, Swathikan Chidambaram, Tom Crosby, Richard P T Evans, Ewen A Griffiths, Sivesh K Kamarajah, Sheraz R Markar, Nigel Trudgill, Timothy J Underwood, James A Gossage
{"title":"早期食管胃腺癌恶性结节累及的患病率和风险因素:多中心回顾性大会研究(早期食管胃癌的镜下切除术、食管切除术或胃切除术)的结果。","authors":"Philip H Pucher, Saqib A Rahman, Pradeep Bhandari, Natalie Blencowe, Swathikan Chidambaram, Tom Crosby, Richard P T Evans, Ewen A Griffiths, Sivesh K Kamarajah, Sheraz R Markar, Nigel Trudgill, Timothy J Underwood, James A Gossage","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to quantify lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk and outcomes following treatment of early esophago-gastric (EG) adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard of care for early T1N0 EG cancer is endoscopic resection (ER). Radical surgical resection is recommended for patients perceived to be at risk of LNM. Current models to select organ-preserving versus surgical treatment are inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CONGRESS is a UK-based multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with clinical or pathological T1N0 EG adenocarcinoma from 2015 to 2022 were included. Outcomes and rates of LNM were assessed. Cox regression was performed to assess the impact of prognostic and treatment factors on overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1601 patients from 26 centers were included, with median follow-up 32 months (IQR 14-53). 1285/1612 (80.3%) underwent ER, 497/1601 (31.0%) underwent surgery. Overall rate of LNM was 13.5%. On ER staging, tumour depth (T1bsm2-3 17.6% vs T1a 7.1%), lymphovascular invasion (17.2% vs 12.6%), or signet cells (28.6% vs 13.0%) were associated with LNM. In multivariable regression analysis, these were not significantly associated with LNM rates or survival. Adjusting for demographic and tumour variables, surgery after ER was associated with significant survival benefit, HR 0.33 (0.15-0.77), P =0.010.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large multicenter data set suggests that early EG adenocarcinoma is associated with significant risk of LNM. These data are representative of current real clinical practice with ER-based staging, and suggests previously held beliefs regarding reliability of predictive factors for LNM may need to be reconsidered. Further research to identify patients who may benefit from organ-preserving versus surgical treatment is urgently required.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"363-370"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Risk Factors for Malignant Nodal Involvement in Early Esophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the Multicenter Retrospective Congress Study (endosCopic resectiON, esophaGectomy or Gastrectomy for Early Esophagogastric Cancers).\",\"authors\":\"Philip H Pucher, Saqib A Rahman, Pradeep Bhandari, Natalie Blencowe, Swathikan Chidambaram, Tom Crosby, Richard P T Evans, Ewen A Griffiths, Sivesh K Kamarajah, Sheraz R Markar, Nigel Trudgill, Timothy J Underwood, James A Gossage\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to quantify lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk and outcomes following treatment of early esophago-gastric (EG) adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The standard of care for early T1N0 EG cancer is endoscopic resection (ER). Radical surgical resection is recommended for patients perceived to be at risk of LNM. Current models to select organ-preserving versus surgical treatment are inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CONGRESS is a UK-based multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with clinical or pathological T1N0 EG adenocarcinoma from 2015 to 2022 were included. Outcomes and rates of LNM were assessed. Cox regression was performed to assess the impact of prognostic and treatment factors on overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1601 patients from 26 centers were included, with median follow-up 32 months (IQR 14-53). 1285/1612 (80.3%) underwent ER, 497/1601 (31.0%) underwent surgery. Overall rate of LNM was 13.5%. On ER staging, tumour depth (T1bsm2-3 17.6% vs T1a 7.1%), lymphovascular invasion (17.2% vs 12.6%), or signet cells (28.6% vs 13.0%) were associated with LNM. In multivariable regression analysis, these were not significantly associated with LNM rates or survival. Adjusting for demographic and tumour variables, surgery after ER was associated with significant survival benefit, HR 0.33 (0.15-0.77), P =0.010.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This large multicenter data set suggests that early EG adenocarcinoma is associated with significant risk of LNM. These data are representative of current real clinical practice with ER-based staging, and suggests previously held beliefs regarding reliability of predictive factors for LNM may need to be reconsidered. Further research to identify patients who may benefit from organ-preserving versus surgical treatment is urgently required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"363-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在量化早期食管胃(EG)腺癌治疗后的 LNM 风险和结果:背景:早期 T1N0 EG 癌的标准治疗方法是内镜下切除术(ER)。对于有淋巴结转移(LNM)风险的患者,建议进行根治性手术切除。目前选择保留器官治疗与手术治疗的模式并不一致:CONGRESS是一项基于英国的多中心回顾性队列研究。研究纳入了2015-2022年期间诊断为临床或病理T1N0 EG腺癌的患者。对结果和LNM发生率进行了评估。采用Cox回归评估预后和治疗因素对总生存期的影响:共纳入26个中心的1601名患者,中位随访时间为32个月(IQR 14-53)。1285/1612(80.3%)例患者接受了急诊手术,497/1601(31.0%)例患者接受了手术。LNM总发生率为13.5%。在ER分期中,肿瘤深度(T1bsm2-3 17.6% 对 T1a 7.1%)、淋巴管侵犯(17.2% 对 12.6%)或标志细胞(28.6% 对 13.0%)与LNM相关。在多变量回归分析中,这些因素与LNM发生率或生存率无明显关系。调整人口统计学和肿瘤变量后,ER后手术与显著的生存获益相关,HR为0.33(0.15-0.77),P=0.010:这一大型多中心数据集表明,早期EG腺癌与LNM的重大风险相关。该数据代表了目前基于ER分期的实际临床实践,并表明以前对LNM预测因素可靠性的看法可能需要重新考虑。目前急需开展进一步研究,以确定哪些患者可从保留器官治疗与手术治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Malignant Nodal Involvement in Early Esophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the Multicenter Retrospective Congress Study (endosCopic resectiON, esophaGectomy or Gastrectomy for Early Esophagogastric Cancers).

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify lymph node metastasis (LNM) risk and outcomes following treatment of early esophago-gastric (EG) adenocarcinoma.

Background: The standard of care for early T1N0 EG cancer is endoscopic resection (ER). Radical surgical resection is recommended for patients perceived to be at risk of LNM. Current models to select organ-preserving versus surgical treatment are inconsistent.

Methods: CONGRESS is a UK-based multicenter retrospective cohort study. Patients diagnosed with clinical or pathological T1N0 EG adenocarcinoma from 2015 to 2022 were included. Outcomes and rates of LNM were assessed. Cox regression was performed to assess the impact of prognostic and treatment factors on overall survival.

Results: A total of 1601 patients from 26 centers were included, with median follow-up 32 months (IQR 14-53). 1285/1612 (80.3%) underwent ER, 497/1601 (31.0%) underwent surgery. Overall rate of LNM was 13.5%. On ER staging, tumour depth (T1bsm2-3 17.6% vs T1a 7.1%), lymphovascular invasion (17.2% vs 12.6%), or signet cells (28.6% vs 13.0%) were associated with LNM. In multivariable regression analysis, these were not significantly associated with LNM rates or survival. Adjusting for demographic and tumour variables, surgery after ER was associated with significant survival benefit, HR 0.33 (0.15-0.77), P =0.010.

Conclusions: This large multicenter data set suggests that early EG adenocarcinoma is associated with significant risk of LNM. These data are representative of current real clinical practice with ER-based staging, and suggests previously held beliefs regarding reliability of predictive factors for LNM may need to be reconsidered. Further research to identify patients who may benefit from organ-preserving versus surgical treatment is urgently required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信