Dominic Rafie, David Beyer, Kyle Schmanke, Frank Rafie
{"title":"确定计划 SAVI 近距离放射治疗 APBI 的最佳时间。","authors":"Dominic Rafie, David Beyer, Kyle Schmanke, Frank Rafie","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Accelerated partial breast irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy treats early-stage carcinoma. Strut-adjusted volume implant applicators are inserted into the cavity post-lumpectomy. For an unstable applicator, changes in distance are seen each day between struts. If an applicator is asymmetrical with no strut movement on subsequent days, then it is stable. If an asymmetrical applicator continues to change strut distances, it is unstable. Waiting for applicator stabilization improves treatment reproducibility but increases infection risk. There is currently no consensus on stability, with ranges from 24 hours (h) to 72 h. Therefore, this study aims to determine when stability is achieved.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 242 female breast cancer patients (2014–2022). CT was performed the same day as applicator insertion (Day 0) and repeated each treatment day. If applicators were initially asymmetrical, the distance between adjacent struts was measured, and the percentage change between the next and previous treatment day was calculated to determine how many applicators stabilized. Less than 5% change indicated stability.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>On Day 0, 208 out of 242 patients (86%) had stable and symmetrical applicators that maintained stability each treatment day, and 34 out of 242 patients (14%) had applicators with asymmetrical struts. Within 24 h post-insertion, 229 out of 242 (95%) patients had stabilized applicators that maintained stability on subsequent treatment days.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Narrows previously suggested stability (24–72 h) to 24 h, leading to improved treatment efficiency and decreased infection risk as less time is needed to achieve applicator stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55334,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 6","pages":"Pages 737-742"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the optimal time for planning SAVI brachytherapy for APBI\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Rafie, David Beyer, Kyle Schmanke, Frank Rafie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>INTRODUCTION</h3><div>Accelerated partial breast irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy treats early-stage carcinoma. Strut-adjusted volume implant applicators are inserted into the cavity post-lumpectomy. For an unstable applicator, changes in distance are seen each day between struts. If an applicator is asymmetrical with no strut movement on subsequent days, then it is stable. If an asymmetrical applicator continues to change strut distances, it is unstable. Waiting for applicator stabilization improves treatment reproducibility but increases infection risk. There is currently no consensus on stability, with ranges from 24 hours (h) to 72 h. Therefore, this study aims to determine when stability is achieved.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 242 female breast cancer patients (2014–2022). CT was performed the same day as applicator insertion (Day 0) and repeated each treatment day. If applicators were initially asymmetrical, the distance between adjacent struts was measured, and the percentage change between the next and previous treatment day was calculated to determine how many applicators stabilized. Less than 5% change indicated stability.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>On Day 0, 208 out of 242 patients (86%) had stable and symmetrical applicators that maintained stability each treatment day, and 34 out of 242 patients (14%) had applicators with asymmetrical struts. Within 24 h post-insertion, 229 out of 242 (95%) patients had stabilized applicators that maintained stability on subsequent treatment days.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Narrows previously suggested stability (24–72 h) to 24 h, leading to improved treatment efficiency and decreased infection risk as less time is needed to achieve applicator stability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 737-742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124000461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472124000461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of the optimal time for planning SAVI brachytherapy for APBI
INTRODUCTION
Accelerated partial breast irradiation with high dose rate brachytherapy treats early-stage carcinoma. Strut-adjusted volume implant applicators are inserted into the cavity post-lumpectomy. For an unstable applicator, changes in distance are seen each day between struts. If an applicator is asymmetrical with no strut movement on subsequent days, then it is stable. If an asymmetrical applicator continues to change strut distances, it is unstable. Waiting for applicator stabilization improves treatment reproducibility but increases infection risk. There is currently no consensus on stability, with ranges from 24 hours (h) to 72 h. Therefore, this study aims to determine when stability is achieved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 242 female breast cancer patients (2014–2022). CT was performed the same day as applicator insertion (Day 0) and repeated each treatment day. If applicators were initially asymmetrical, the distance between adjacent struts was measured, and the percentage change between the next and previous treatment day was calculated to determine how many applicators stabilized. Less than 5% change indicated stability.
RESULTS
On Day 0, 208 out of 242 patients (86%) had stable and symmetrical applicators that maintained stability each treatment day, and 34 out of 242 patients (14%) had applicators with asymmetrical struts. Within 24 h post-insertion, 229 out of 242 (95%) patients had stabilized applicators that maintained stability on subsequent treatment days.
CONCLUSION
Narrows previously suggested stability (24–72 h) to 24 h, leading to improved treatment efficiency and decreased infection risk as less time is needed to achieve applicator stability.
期刊介绍:
Brachytherapy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed articles and selected reviews on the techniques and clinical applications of interstitial and intracavitary radiation in the management of cancers. Laboratory and experimental research relevant to clinical practice is also included. Related disciplines include medical physics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology and radiology. Brachytherapy publishes technical advances, original articles, reviews, and point/counterpoint on controversial issues. Original articles that address any aspect of brachytherapy are invited. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.