Steven Cohen, Emily Metcalf, Monique J Brown, Neelam H Ahmed, Caitlin Nash, Mary L Greaney
{"title":"对 \"农村死亡率惩罚 \"的进一步研究:不同种族、地区和测量方法的差异。","authors":"Steven Cohen, Emily Metcalf, Monique J Brown, Neelam H Ahmed, Caitlin Nash, Mary L Greaney","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial health disparities are well documented and pervasive across the United States. Evidence suggests there is a \"rural mortality penalty\" whereby rural residents experience poorer health outcomes than their urban counterparts. However, whether this penalty is uniform across demographic groups and U.S. regions is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how rural-urban differences in mortality differ by race (Black vs. White), U.S. region, poverty status, and how rural-urban status is measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)/100,000 by U.S. county (2015-2019) were obtained by race (Black/White) from the CDC Wonder National Vital Statistics System (2015-2019) and were merged with county-level social determinants from the US Census Bureau and County Health Rankings. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed the associations between rurality (index of relative rurality [IRR] decile, rural-urban continuum codes, and population density) and race-specific ASMR, overall, and by Census region and poverty level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, average ASMR was significantly higher in rural areas than urban areas for both Black (rural ASMR = 949.1 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 857.7 per 100,000) and White (rural ASMR = 903.0 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 791.6 per 100,000) populations. The Black-White difference was substantially higher (p < 0.001) in urban than in rural counties (65.1 per 100,000 vs. 46.1 per 100,000). Black-White differences and patterns in ASMR varied notably by poverty status and U.S. region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policies and interventions designed to reduce racial health disparities should consider and address key contextual factors associated with geographic location, including rural-urban status and socioeconomic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A closer examination of the \\\"rural mortality penalty\\\": Variability by race, region, and measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Cohen, Emily Metcalf, Monique J Brown, Neelam H Ahmed, Caitlin Nash, Mary L Greaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial health disparities are well documented and pervasive across the United States. Evidence suggests there is a \\\"rural mortality penalty\\\" whereby rural residents experience poorer health outcomes than their urban counterparts. However, whether this penalty is uniform across demographic groups and U.S. regions is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how rural-urban differences in mortality differ by race (Black vs. White), U.S. region, poverty status, and how rural-urban status is measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)/100,000 by U.S. county (2015-2019) were obtained by race (Black/White) from the CDC Wonder National Vital Statistics System (2015-2019) and were merged with county-level social determinants from the US Census Bureau and County Health Rankings. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed the associations between rurality (index of relative rurality [IRR] decile, rural-urban continuum codes, and population density) and race-specific ASMR, overall, and by Census region and poverty level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, average ASMR was significantly higher in rural areas than urban areas for both Black (rural ASMR = 949.1 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 857.7 per 100,000) and White (rural ASMR = 903.0 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 791.6 per 100,000) populations. The Black-White difference was substantially higher (p < 0.001) in urban than in rural counties (65.1 per 100,000 vs. 46.1 per 100,000). Black-White differences and patterns in ASMR varied notably by poverty status and U.S. region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policies and interventions designed to reduce racial health disparities should consider and address key contextual factors associated with geographic location, including rural-urban status and socioeconomic status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A closer examination of the "rural mortality penalty": Variability by race, region, and measurement.
Background: Racial health disparities are well documented and pervasive across the United States. Evidence suggests there is a "rural mortality penalty" whereby rural residents experience poorer health outcomes than their urban counterparts. However, whether this penalty is uniform across demographic groups and U.S. regions is unknown.
Objective: To assess how rural-urban differences in mortality differ by race (Black vs. White), U.S. region, poverty status, and how rural-urban status is measured.
Methods: Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)/100,000 by U.S. county (2015-2019) were obtained by race (Black/White) from the CDC Wonder National Vital Statistics System (2015-2019) and were merged with county-level social determinants from the US Census Bureau and County Health Rankings. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed the associations between rurality (index of relative rurality [IRR] decile, rural-urban continuum codes, and population density) and race-specific ASMR, overall, and by Census region and poverty level.
Results: Overall, average ASMR was significantly higher in rural areas than urban areas for both Black (rural ASMR = 949.1 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 857.7 per 100,000) and White (rural ASMR = 903.0 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 791.6 per 100,000) populations. The Black-White difference was substantially higher (p < 0.001) in urban than in rural counties (65.1 per 100,000 vs. 46.1 per 100,000). Black-White differences and patterns in ASMR varied notably by poverty status and U.S. region.
Conclusion: Policies and interventions designed to reduce racial health disparities should consider and address key contextual factors associated with geographic location, including rural-urban status and socioeconomic status.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.