对 "农村死亡率惩罚 "的进一步研究:不同种族、地区和测量方法的差异。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Steven Cohen, Emily Metcalf, Monique J Brown, Neelam H Ahmed, Caitlin Nash, Mary L Greaney
{"title":"对 \"农村死亡率惩罚 \"的进一步研究:不同种族、地区和测量方法的差异。","authors":"Steven Cohen, Emily Metcalf, Monique J Brown, Neelam H Ahmed, Caitlin Nash, Mary L Greaney","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial health disparities are well documented and pervasive across the United States. Evidence suggests there is a \"rural mortality penalty\" whereby rural residents experience poorer health outcomes than their urban counterparts. However, whether this penalty is uniform across demographic groups and U.S. regions is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how rural-urban differences in mortality differ by race (Black vs. White), U.S. region, poverty status, and how rural-urban status is measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)/100,000 by U.S. county (2015-2019) were obtained by race (Black/White) from the CDC Wonder National Vital Statistics System (2015-2019) and were merged with county-level social determinants from the US Census Bureau and County Health Rankings. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed the associations between rurality (index of relative rurality [IRR] decile, rural-urban continuum codes, and population density) and race-specific ASMR, overall, and by Census region and poverty level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, average ASMR was significantly higher in rural areas than urban areas for both Black (rural ASMR = 949.1 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 857.7 per 100,000) and White (rural ASMR = 903.0 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 791.6 per 100,000) populations. The Black-White difference was substantially higher (p < 0.001) in urban than in rural counties (65.1 per 100,000 vs. 46.1 per 100,000). Black-White differences and patterns in ASMR varied notably by poverty status and U.S. region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policies and interventions designed to reduce racial health disparities should consider and address key contextual factors associated with geographic location, including rural-urban status and socioeconomic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A closer examination of the \\\"rural mortality penalty\\\": Variability by race, region, and measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Cohen, Emily Metcalf, Monique J Brown, Neelam H Ahmed, Caitlin Nash, Mary L Greaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial health disparities are well documented and pervasive across the United States. Evidence suggests there is a \\\"rural mortality penalty\\\" whereby rural residents experience poorer health outcomes than their urban counterparts. However, whether this penalty is uniform across demographic groups and U.S. regions is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how rural-urban differences in mortality differ by race (Black vs. White), U.S. region, poverty status, and how rural-urban status is measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)/100,000 by U.S. county (2015-2019) were obtained by race (Black/White) from the CDC Wonder National Vital Statistics System (2015-2019) and were merged with county-level social determinants from the US Census Bureau and County Health Rankings. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed the associations between rurality (index of relative rurality [IRR] decile, rural-urban continuum codes, and population density) and race-specific ASMR, overall, and by Census region and poverty level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, average ASMR was significantly higher in rural areas than urban areas for both Black (rural ASMR = 949.1 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 857.7 per 100,000) and White (rural ASMR = 903.0 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 791.6 per 100,000) populations. The Black-White difference was substantially higher (p < 0.001) in urban than in rural counties (65.1 per 100,000 vs. 46.1 per 100,000). Black-White differences and patterns in ASMR varied notably by poverty status and U.S. region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policies and interventions designed to reduce racial health disparities should consider and address key contextual factors associated with geographic location, including rural-urban status and socioeconomic status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:种族健康差异在美国有据可查,而且普遍存在。有证据表明,农村居民的健康状况比城市居民差,这就是 "农村死亡率惩罚"。然而,这种惩罚在不同人口群体和美国不同地区是否一致尚不清楚:评估不同种族(黑人与白人)、不同美国地区、不同贫困状况以及不同城乡状况下的死亡率差异:从疾病预防控制中心的 Wonder National Vital Statistics System(2015-2019 年)中按种族(黑人/白人)获得了美国各县(2015-2019 年)的年龄标准化死亡率(ASMRs)/100,000,并与美国人口普查局和县健康排名中的县级社会决定因素进行了合并。多变量广义线性模型评估了乡村化(相对乡村化指数[IRR]十分位数、城乡连续编码和人口密度)与特定种族ASMR之间的关系,包括总体关系、人口普查地区关系和贫困程度关系:总体而言,农村地区黑人(农村 ASMR = 每 100,000 人中有 949.1 人,城市 ASMR = 每 100,000 人中有 857.7 人)和白人(农村 ASMR = 每 100,000 人中有 903.0 人,城市 ASMR = 每 100,000 人中有 791.6 人)的平均 ASMR 明显高于城市地区。城市县的黑人-白人差异(p < 0.001)远高于农村县(65.1/100,000 vs. 46.1/100,000)。黑人与白人在 ASMR 方面的差异和模式因贫困状况和美国地区而有显著不同:结论:旨在减少种族健康差异的政策和干预措施应考虑并解决与地理位置相关的关键背景因素,包括城乡状况和社会经济状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A closer examination of the "rural mortality penalty": Variability by race, region, and measurement.

Background: Racial health disparities are well documented and pervasive across the United States. Evidence suggests there is a "rural mortality penalty" whereby rural residents experience poorer health outcomes than their urban counterparts. However, whether this penalty is uniform across demographic groups and U.S. regions is unknown.

Objective: To assess how rural-urban differences in mortality differ by race (Black vs. White), U.S. region, poverty status, and how rural-urban status is measured.

Methods: Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)/100,000 by U.S. county (2015-2019) were obtained by race (Black/White) from the CDC Wonder National Vital Statistics System (2015-2019) and were merged with county-level social determinants from the US Census Bureau and County Health Rankings. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed the associations between rurality (index of relative rurality [IRR] decile, rural-urban continuum codes, and population density) and race-specific ASMR, overall, and by Census region and poverty level.

Results: Overall, average ASMR was significantly higher in rural areas than urban areas for both Black (rural ASMR = 949.1 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 857.7 per 100,000) and White (rural ASMR = 903.0 per 100,000 vs. urban ASMR = 791.6 per 100,000) populations. The Black-White difference was substantially higher (p < 0.001) in urban than in rural counties (65.1 per 100,000 vs. 46.1 per 100,000). Black-White differences and patterns in ASMR varied notably by poverty status and U.S. region.

Conclusion: Policies and interventions designed to reduce racial health disparities should consider and address key contextual factors associated with geographic location, including rural-urban status and socioeconomic status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信