创伤后的全身炎症及其对啮齿动物大脑神经炎症基因表达的影响。

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Cassie J Rowe, Uloma Nwaolu, Laura Martin, Benjamin J Huang, Josef Mang, Daniela Salinas, Cody D Schlaff, Sennay Ghenbot, Jefferson L Lansford, Benjamin K Potter, Seth A Schobel, Eric R Gann, Thomas A Davis
{"title":"创伤后的全身炎症及其对啮齿动物大脑神经炎症基因表达的影响。","authors":"Cassie J Rowe, Uloma Nwaolu, Laura Martin, Benjamin J Huang, Josef Mang, Daniela Salinas, Cody D Schlaff, Sennay Ghenbot, Jefferson L Lansford, Benjamin K Potter, Seth A Schobel, Eric R Gann, Thomas A Davis","doi":"10.1186/s12974-024-03205-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma can result in systemic inflammation that leads to organ dysfunction, but the impact on the brain, particularly following extracranial insults, has been largely overlooked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Building upon our prior findings, we aimed to understand the impact of systemic inflammation on neuroinflammatory gene transcripts in eight brain regions in rats exposed to (1) blast overpressure exposure [BOP], (2) cutaneous thermal injury [BU], (3) complex extremity injury, 3 hours (h) of tourniquet-induced ischemia, and hind limb amputation [CEI+tI+HLA], (4) BOP+BU or (5) BOP+CEI and delayed HLA [BOP+CEI+dHLA] at 6, 24, and 168 h post-injury (hpi).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Globally, the number and magnitude of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) correlated with injury severity, systemic inflammation markers, and end-organ damage, driven by several chemokines/cytokines (Csf3, Cxcr2, Il16, and Tgfb2), neurosteroids/prostaglandins (Cyp19a1, Ptger2, and Ptger3), and markers of neurodegeneration (Gfap, Grin2b, and Homer1). Regional neuroinflammatory activity was least impacted following BOP. Non-blast trauma (in the BU and CEI+tI+HLA groups) contributed to an earlier, robust and diverse neuroinflammatory response across brain regions (up to 2-50-fold greater than that in the BOP group), while combined trauma (in the BOP+CEI+dHLA group) significantly advanced neuroinflammation in all regions except for the cerebellum. In contrast, BOP+BU resulted in differential activity of several critical neuroinflammatory-neurodegenerative markers compared to BU. t-SNE plots of DEGs demonstrated that the onset, extent, and duration of the inflammatory response are brain region dependent. Regardless of injury type, the thalamus and hypothalamus, which are critical for maintaining homeostasis, had the most DEGs. Our results indicate that neuroinflammation in all groups progressively increased or remained at peak levels over the study duration, while markers of end-organ dysfunction decreased or otherwise resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, these findings emphasize the brain's sensitivity to mediators of systemic inflammation and provide an example of immune-brain crosstalk. Follow-on molecular and behavioral investigations are warranted to understand the short- to long-term pathophysiological consequences on the brain, particularly the mechanism of blood-brain barrier breakdown, immune cell penetration-activation, and microglial activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16577,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroinflammation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic inflammation following traumatic injury and its impact on neuroinflammatory gene expression in the rodent brain.\",\"authors\":\"Cassie J Rowe, Uloma Nwaolu, Laura Martin, Benjamin J Huang, Josef Mang, Daniela Salinas, Cody D Schlaff, Sennay Ghenbot, Jefferson L Lansford, Benjamin K Potter, Seth A Schobel, Eric R Gann, Thomas A Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12974-024-03205-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma can result in systemic inflammation that leads to organ dysfunction, but the impact on the brain, particularly following extracranial insults, has been largely overlooked.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Building upon our prior findings, we aimed to understand the impact of systemic inflammation on neuroinflammatory gene transcripts in eight brain regions in rats exposed to (1) blast overpressure exposure [BOP], (2) cutaneous thermal injury [BU], (3) complex extremity injury, 3 hours (h) of tourniquet-induced ischemia, and hind limb amputation [CEI+tI+HLA], (4) BOP+BU or (5) BOP+CEI and delayed HLA [BOP+CEI+dHLA] at 6, 24, and 168 h post-injury (hpi).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Globally, the number and magnitude of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) correlated with injury severity, systemic inflammation markers, and end-organ damage, driven by several chemokines/cytokines (Csf3, Cxcr2, Il16, and Tgfb2), neurosteroids/prostaglandins (Cyp19a1, Ptger2, and Ptger3), and markers of neurodegeneration (Gfap, Grin2b, and Homer1). Regional neuroinflammatory activity was least impacted following BOP. Non-blast trauma (in the BU and CEI+tI+HLA groups) contributed to an earlier, robust and diverse neuroinflammatory response across brain regions (up to 2-50-fold greater than that in the BOP group), while combined trauma (in the BOP+CEI+dHLA group) significantly advanced neuroinflammation in all regions except for the cerebellum. In contrast, BOP+BU resulted in differential activity of several critical neuroinflammatory-neurodegenerative markers compared to BU. t-SNE plots of DEGs demonstrated that the onset, extent, and duration of the inflammatory response are brain region dependent. Regardless of injury type, the thalamus and hypothalamus, which are critical for maintaining homeostasis, had the most DEGs. Our results indicate that neuroinflammation in all groups progressively increased or remained at peak levels over the study duration, while markers of end-organ dysfunction decreased or otherwise resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collectively, these findings emphasize the brain's sensitivity to mediators of systemic inflammation and provide an example of immune-brain crosstalk. Follow-on molecular and behavioral investigations are warranted to understand the short- to long-term pathophysiological consequences on the brain, particularly the mechanism of blood-brain barrier breakdown, immune cell penetration-activation, and microglial activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-024-03205-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-024-03205-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤可导致全身炎症,从而导致器官功能障碍,但对大脑的影响,尤其是颅外损伤后对大脑的影响在很大程度上被忽视了:方法: 在先前研究结果的基础上,我们旨在了解全身炎症对大鼠八个脑区神经炎症基因转录本的影响、(2) 皮肤热损伤 [BU];(3) 复杂肢体损伤、止血带诱导缺血 3 小时和后肢截肢 [CEI+tI+HLA];(4) BOP+BU 或 (5) BOP+CEI 和延迟 HLA [BOP+CEI+dHLA](分别在损伤后 6、24 和 168 小时)。结果:从整体上看,差异表达基因(DEGs)的数量和程度与损伤严重程度、全身炎症标志物和终末器官损伤相关,这些基因由几种趋化因子/细胞因子(Csf3、Cxcr2、Il16 和 Tgfb2)、神经类固醇/前列腺素(Cyp19a1、Ptger2 和 Ptger3)以及神经变性标志物(Gfap、Grin2b 和 Homer1)驱动。BOP 对区域神经炎症活动的影响最小。非爆炸性创伤(BU 组和 CEI+tI+HLA 组)导致大脑各区域神经炎症反应更早、更强、更多样(比 BOP 组高 2-50 倍),而联合创伤(BOP+CEI+dHLA 组)则显著加剧了除小脑外所有区域的神经炎症。与此相反,BOP+BU 与 BU 相比,几个关键的神经炎症-神经退行性标志物的活性不同。DEGs 的 t-SNE 图显示,炎症反应的开始、程度和持续时间与脑区有关。无论损伤类型如何,丘脑和下丘脑的 DEGs 最多,而这两个部位对维持体内平衡至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,在研究持续时间内,所有组别的神经炎症都在逐渐加重或保持在峰值水平,而内脏器官功能障碍的标志物却在减轻或以其他方式缓解:总之,这些发现强调了大脑对全身炎症介质的敏感性,并提供了一个免疫-大脑串扰的例子。需要进行后续的分子和行为研究,以了解对大脑造成的短期到长期病理生理后果,特别是血脑屏障破坏、免疫细胞渗透-激活和小胶质细胞激活的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systemic inflammation following traumatic injury and its impact on neuroinflammatory gene expression in the rodent brain.

Background: Trauma can result in systemic inflammation that leads to organ dysfunction, but the impact on the brain, particularly following extracranial insults, has been largely overlooked.

Methods: Building upon our prior findings, we aimed to understand the impact of systemic inflammation on neuroinflammatory gene transcripts in eight brain regions in rats exposed to (1) blast overpressure exposure [BOP], (2) cutaneous thermal injury [BU], (3) complex extremity injury, 3 hours (h) of tourniquet-induced ischemia, and hind limb amputation [CEI+tI+HLA], (4) BOP+BU or (5) BOP+CEI and delayed HLA [BOP+CEI+dHLA] at 6, 24, and 168 h post-injury (hpi).

Results: Globally, the number and magnitude of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) correlated with injury severity, systemic inflammation markers, and end-organ damage, driven by several chemokines/cytokines (Csf3, Cxcr2, Il16, and Tgfb2), neurosteroids/prostaglandins (Cyp19a1, Ptger2, and Ptger3), and markers of neurodegeneration (Gfap, Grin2b, and Homer1). Regional neuroinflammatory activity was least impacted following BOP. Non-blast trauma (in the BU and CEI+tI+HLA groups) contributed to an earlier, robust and diverse neuroinflammatory response across brain regions (up to 2-50-fold greater than that in the BOP group), while combined trauma (in the BOP+CEI+dHLA group) significantly advanced neuroinflammation in all regions except for the cerebellum. In contrast, BOP+BU resulted in differential activity of several critical neuroinflammatory-neurodegenerative markers compared to BU. t-SNE plots of DEGs demonstrated that the onset, extent, and duration of the inflammatory response are brain region dependent. Regardless of injury type, the thalamus and hypothalamus, which are critical for maintaining homeostasis, had the most DEGs. Our results indicate that neuroinflammation in all groups progressively increased or remained at peak levels over the study duration, while markers of end-organ dysfunction decreased or otherwise resolved.

Conclusions: Collectively, these findings emphasize the brain's sensitivity to mediators of systemic inflammation and provide an example of immune-brain crosstalk. Follow-on molecular and behavioral investigations are warranted to understand the short- to long-term pathophysiological consequences on the brain, particularly the mechanism of blood-brain barrier breakdown, immune cell penetration-activation, and microglial activation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Journal of Neuroinflammation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
276
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroinflammation is a peer-reviewed, open access publication that emphasizes the interaction between the immune system, particularly the innate immune system, and the nervous system. It covers various aspects, including the involvement of CNS immune mediators like microglia and astrocytes, the cytokines and chemokines they produce, and the influence of peripheral neuro-immune interactions, T cells, monocytes, complement proteins, acute phase proteins, oxidative injury, and related molecular processes. Neuroinflammation is a rapidly expanding field that has significantly enhanced our knowledge of chronic neurological diseases. It attracts researchers from diverse disciplines such as pathology, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, clinical medicine, and epidemiology. Substantial contributions to this field have been made through studies involving populations, patients, postmortem tissues, animal models, and in vitro systems. The Journal of Neuroinflammation consolidates research that centers around common pathogenic processes. It serves as a platform for integrative reviews and commentaries in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信