{"title":"FlexRaft:利用灵活的擦除编码实现最低成本共识和快速恢复","authors":"Mi Zhang;Qihan Kang;Patrick P. C. Lee","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3443424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consensus protocols like Paxos and Raft provide data consistency and fault tolerance for distributed services. Log replication in these protocols can be supported by erasure coding, which incurs lower redundancy than full-copy replication and significantly saves network and storage costs for overall performance improvements. However, existing consensus protocols with erasure coding cannot achieve the minimum network and storage costs during log replication. We propose FlexRaft, which dynamically varies the coding scheme used in Raft based on the server status to always achieve the theoretically minimum redundancy ratio, while maintaining the same liveness as in Raft. To address the issue of an inconsistent coding scheme between the leader and its followers, we specify the prerequisite of overwriting a log entry and also allow the leader and its followers to exactly track the coding scheme being used. We further extend FlexRaft into FlexRaft+, which provides a different storage layout to vary the coding scheme through a novel technique called re-encoding-free replication, so as to enable fast server recovery. We prove that both FlexRaft and FlexRaft+ maintain Raft safety. We implement a prototype of FlexRaft and FlexRaft+, atop which we build a distributed key-value store to show its efficacy. Experiments on Alibaba Cloud show that FlexRaft achieves the theoretically minimum network and storage costs in practice, and reduces the commit latency by 44.51% and 19.37% compared with state-of-the-art CRaft and HRaft, respectively. FlexRaft+ further reduces the commit latency when the coding scheme is being varied and improves the server recovery performance.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FlexRaft: Exploiting Flexible Erasure Coding for Minimum-Cost Consensus and Fast Recovery\",\"authors\":\"Mi Zhang;Qihan Kang;Patrick P. C. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3443424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consensus protocols like Paxos and Raft provide data consistency and fault tolerance for distributed services. Log replication in these protocols can be supported by erasure coding, which incurs lower redundancy than full-copy replication and significantly saves network and storage costs for overall performance improvements. However, existing consensus protocols with erasure coding cannot achieve the minimum network and storage costs during log replication. We propose FlexRaft, which dynamically varies the coding scheme used in Raft based on the server status to always achieve the theoretically minimum redundancy ratio, while maintaining the same liveness as in Raft. To address the issue of an inconsistent coding scheme between the leader and its followers, we specify the prerequisite of overwriting a log entry and also allow the leader and its followers to exactly track the coding scheme being used. We further extend FlexRaft into FlexRaft+, which provides a different storage layout to vary the coding scheme through a novel technique called re-encoding-free replication, so as to enable fast server recovery. We prove that both FlexRaft and FlexRaft+ maintain Raft safety. We implement a prototype of FlexRaft and FlexRaft+, atop which we build a distributed key-value store to show its efficacy. Experiments on Alibaba Cloud show that FlexRaft achieves the theoretically minimum network and storage costs in practice, and reduces the commit latency by 44.51% and 19.37% compared with state-of-the-art CRaft and HRaft, respectively. FlexRaft+ further reduces the commit latency when the coding scheme is being varied and improves the server recovery performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10636794/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10636794/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
FlexRaft: Exploiting Flexible Erasure Coding for Minimum-Cost Consensus and Fast Recovery
Consensus protocols like Paxos and Raft provide data consistency and fault tolerance for distributed services. Log replication in these protocols can be supported by erasure coding, which incurs lower redundancy than full-copy replication and significantly saves network and storage costs for overall performance improvements. However, existing consensus protocols with erasure coding cannot achieve the minimum network and storage costs during log replication. We propose FlexRaft, which dynamically varies the coding scheme used in Raft based on the server status to always achieve the theoretically minimum redundancy ratio, while maintaining the same liveness as in Raft. To address the issue of an inconsistent coding scheme between the leader and its followers, we specify the prerequisite of overwriting a log entry and also allow the leader and its followers to exactly track the coding scheme being used. We further extend FlexRaft into FlexRaft+, which provides a different storage layout to vary the coding scheme through a novel technique called re-encoding-free replication, so as to enable fast server recovery. We prove that both FlexRaft and FlexRaft+ maintain Raft safety. We implement a prototype of FlexRaft and FlexRaft+, atop which we build a distributed key-value store to show its efficacy. Experiments on Alibaba Cloud show that FlexRaft achieves the theoretically minimum network and storage costs in practice, and reduces the commit latency by 44.51% and 19.37% compared with state-of-the-art CRaft and HRaft, respectively. FlexRaft+ further reduces the commit latency when the coding scheme is being varied and improves the server recovery performance.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.