奉献"、"索取 "和 "潜伏":如何更好地管理团队?

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Catherine Hungerford, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary
{"title":"奉献\"、\"索取 \"和 \"潜伏\":如何更好地管理团队?","authors":"Catherine Hungerford, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary","doi":"10.1111/jan.16412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Every day, nurses work as team members in wide-ranging settings to achieve diverse outcomes. Some teams are intradisciplinary (e.g., nursing only), others are multidisciplinary (i.e., various professions). Collaboration involves demonstrating mutual respect and trust, acknowledging the diverse but interconnected work of each of the professional groups, and focusing on shared goals (Sangaleti et al. <span>2017</span>). For teams to function cohesively, clear leadership and team member responsibilities are needed, together with well-defined disciplinary roles and other factors such as effective communication and feedback mechanisms (Wang et al. <span>2024</span>).</p>\n<p>Achieving cohesiveness, however, can be challenging. Such challenges could explain the large body of academic literature discussing the how, when, where and why of teams and teamwork or groups and group dynamics. Topics include the various functions of team members, such as the role of leaders or facilitators, encouragers or motivators, harmonisers or conflict mediators, evaluators or critics and so on. The phenomenon of the social loafer in groups has also been examined. More colloquially, team members are sometimes called ‘givers’, ‘takers’ and ‘lurkers’. This editorial discusses team or group dynamics, focusing on the benefits and challenges of managing the giving, taking and lurking factors at work in some groups. Tips on optimising group cohesion are also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Giving’, ‘Taking’ and ‘Lurking’: How Can We Better Manage Teams?\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Hungerford, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Every day, nurses work as team members in wide-ranging settings to achieve diverse outcomes. Some teams are intradisciplinary (e.g., nursing only), others are multidisciplinary (i.e., various professions). Collaboration involves demonstrating mutual respect and trust, acknowledging the diverse but interconnected work of each of the professional groups, and focusing on shared goals (Sangaleti et al. <span>2017</span>). For teams to function cohesively, clear leadership and team member responsibilities are needed, together with well-defined disciplinary roles and other factors such as effective communication and feedback mechanisms (Wang et al. <span>2024</span>).</p>\\n<p>Achieving cohesiveness, however, can be challenging. Such challenges could explain the large body of academic literature discussing the how, when, where and why of teams and teamwork or groups and group dynamics. Topics include the various functions of team members, such as the role of leaders or facilitators, encouragers or motivators, harmonisers or conflict mediators, evaluators or critics and so on. The phenomenon of the social loafer in groups has also been examined. More colloquially, team members are sometimes called ‘givers’, ‘takers’ and ‘lurkers’. This editorial discusses team or group dynamics, focusing on the benefits and challenges of managing the giving, taking and lurking factors at work in some groups. Tips on optimising group cohesion are also provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每天,护士作为团队成员在各种环境中工作,以取得不同的成果。有些团队是跨学科的(例如,只有护理专业),有些则是多学科的(例如,各种专业)。协作包括相互尊重和信任,承认每个专业团体的工作各不相同但又相互关联,并关注共同目标(Sangaleti 等,2017 年)。要使团队发挥凝聚力,需要明确的领导和团队成员职责,以及明确的学科角色和其他因素,如有效的沟通和反馈机制(Wang 等,2024 年)。这些挑战可以解释为什么会有大量的学术文献讨论团队和团队工作或小组和小组动力的方式、时间、地点和原因。主题包括团队成员的各种职能,如领导者或促进者、鼓励者或激励者、协调者或冲突调解者、评估者或批评者等角色。此外,还研究了团队中的社会闲散人员现象。更通俗地说,团队成员有时被称为 "奉献者"、"索取者 "和 "潜伏者"。这篇社论讨论了团队或小组动态,重点是管理某些小组中的付出、索取和潜伏因素的好处和挑战。此外,还提供了优化团队凝聚力的小贴士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Giving’, ‘Taking’ and ‘Lurking’: How Can We Better Manage Teams?

Every day, nurses work as team members in wide-ranging settings to achieve diverse outcomes. Some teams are intradisciplinary (e.g., nursing only), others are multidisciplinary (i.e., various professions). Collaboration involves demonstrating mutual respect and trust, acknowledging the diverse but interconnected work of each of the professional groups, and focusing on shared goals (Sangaleti et al. 2017). For teams to function cohesively, clear leadership and team member responsibilities are needed, together with well-defined disciplinary roles and other factors such as effective communication and feedback mechanisms (Wang et al. 2024).

Achieving cohesiveness, however, can be challenging. Such challenges could explain the large body of academic literature discussing the how, when, where and why of teams and teamwork or groups and group dynamics. Topics include the various functions of team members, such as the role of leaders or facilitators, encouragers or motivators, harmonisers or conflict mediators, evaluators or critics and so on. The phenomenon of the social loafer in groups has also been examined. More colloquially, team members are sometimes called ‘givers’, ‘takers’ and ‘lurkers’. This editorial discusses team or group dynamics, focusing on the benefits and challenges of managing the giving, taking and lurking factors at work in some groups. Tips on optimising group cohesion are also provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信