{"title":"奉献\"、\"索取 \"和 \"潜伏\":如何更好地管理团队?","authors":"Catherine Hungerford, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary","doi":"10.1111/jan.16412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Every day, nurses work as team members in wide-ranging settings to achieve diverse outcomes. Some teams are intradisciplinary (e.g., nursing only), others are multidisciplinary (i.e., various professions). Collaboration involves demonstrating mutual respect and trust, acknowledging the diverse but interconnected work of each of the professional groups, and focusing on shared goals (Sangaleti et al. <span>2017</span>). For teams to function cohesively, clear leadership and team member responsibilities are needed, together with well-defined disciplinary roles and other factors such as effective communication and feedback mechanisms (Wang et al. <span>2024</span>).</p>\n<p>Achieving cohesiveness, however, can be challenging. Such challenges could explain the large body of academic literature discussing the how, when, where and why of teams and teamwork or groups and group dynamics. Topics include the various functions of team members, such as the role of leaders or facilitators, encouragers or motivators, harmonisers or conflict mediators, evaluators or critics and so on. The phenomenon of the social loafer in groups has also been examined. More colloquially, team members are sometimes called ‘givers’, ‘takers’ and ‘lurkers’. This editorial discusses team or group dynamics, focusing on the benefits and challenges of managing the giving, taking and lurking factors at work in some groups. Tips on optimising group cohesion are also provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Giving’, ‘Taking’ and ‘Lurking’: How Can We Better Manage Teams?\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Hungerford, Debra Jackson, Michelle Cleary\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.16412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Every day, nurses work as team members in wide-ranging settings to achieve diverse outcomes. Some teams are intradisciplinary (e.g., nursing only), others are multidisciplinary (i.e., various professions). Collaboration involves demonstrating mutual respect and trust, acknowledging the diverse but interconnected work of each of the professional groups, and focusing on shared goals (Sangaleti et al. <span>2017</span>). For teams to function cohesively, clear leadership and team member responsibilities are needed, together with well-defined disciplinary roles and other factors such as effective communication and feedback mechanisms (Wang et al. <span>2024</span>).</p>\\n<p>Achieving cohesiveness, however, can be challenging. Such challenges could explain the large body of academic literature discussing the how, when, where and why of teams and teamwork or groups and group dynamics. Topics include the various functions of team members, such as the role of leaders or facilitators, encouragers or motivators, harmonisers or conflict mediators, evaluators or critics and so on. The phenomenon of the social loafer in groups has also been examined. More colloquially, team members are sometimes called ‘givers’, ‘takers’ and ‘lurkers’. This editorial discusses team or group dynamics, focusing on the benefits and challenges of managing the giving, taking and lurking factors at work in some groups. Tips on optimising group cohesion are also provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘Giving’, ‘Taking’ and ‘Lurking’: How Can We Better Manage Teams?
Every day, nurses work as team members in wide-ranging settings to achieve diverse outcomes. Some teams are intradisciplinary (e.g., nursing only), others are multidisciplinary (i.e., various professions). Collaboration involves demonstrating mutual respect and trust, acknowledging the diverse but interconnected work of each of the professional groups, and focusing on shared goals (Sangaleti et al. 2017). For teams to function cohesively, clear leadership and team member responsibilities are needed, together with well-defined disciplinary roles and other factors such as effective communication and feedback mechanisms (Wang et al. 2024).
Achieving cohesiveness, however, can be challenging. Such challenges could explain the large body of academic literature discussing the how, when, where and why of teams and teamwork or groups and group dynamics. Topics include the various functions of team members, such as the role of leaders or facilitators, encouragers or motivators, harmonisers or conflict mediators, evaluators or critics and so on. The phenomenon of the social loafer in groups has also been examined. More colloquially, team members are sometimes called ‘givers’, ‘takers’ and ‘lurkers’. This editorial discusses team or group dynamics, focusing on the benefits and challenges of managing the giving, taking and lurking factors at work in some groups. Tips on optimising group cohesion are also provided.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.