监督和惩罚基线校正

IF 3.7 2区 化学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Erik Andries , Ramin Nikzad-Langerodi
{"title":"监督和惩罚基线校正","authors":"Erik Andries ,&nbsp;Ramin Nikzad-Langerodi","doi":"10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spectroscopic measurements can show distorted spectral shapes arising from a mixture of absorbing and scattering contributions. These distortions (or baselines) often manifest themselves as non-constant offsets or low-frequency oscillations. As a result, these baselines can adversely affect analytical and quantitative results. Baseline correction is an umbrella term where one applies pre-processing methods to obtain baseline spectra (the unwanted distortions) and then remove the distortions by differencing. However, current state-of-the art baseline correction methods do not utilize analyte concentrations even if they are available, or even if they contribute significantly to the observed spectral variability. We modify a class of state-of-the-art methods (<em>penalized baseline correction</em>) that easily admit the incorporation of a priori analyte concentrations such that predictions can be enhanced. This modified approach will be deemed <em>supervised and penalized baseline correction</em> (SPBC). Performance will be assessed on two near infrared data sets across both classical penalized baseline correction methods (without analyte information) and modified penalized baseline correction methods (leveraging analyte information). There are cases of SPBC that provide useful baseline-corrected signals such that they outperform state-of-the-art penalized baseline correction algorithms such as AIRPLS. In particular, we observe that performance is conditional on the correlation between separate analytes: the analyte used for baseline correlation and the analyte used for prediction—the greater the correlation between the analyte used for baseline correlation and the analyte used for prediction, the better the prediction performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9774,"journal":{"name":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 105200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervised and penalized baseline correction\",\"authors\":\"Erik Andries ,&nbsp;Ramin Nikzad-Langerodi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Spectroscopic measurements can show distorted spectral shapes arising from a mixture of absorbing and scattering contributions. These distortions (or baselines) often manifest themselves as non-constant offsets or low-frequency oscillations. As a result, these baselines can adversely affect analytical and quantitative results. Baseline correction is an umbrella term where one applies pre-processing methods to obtain baseline spectra (the unwanted distortions) and then remove the distortions by differencing. However, current state-of-the art baseline correction methods do not utilize analyte concentrations even if they are available, or even if they contribute significantly to the observed spectral variability. We modify a class of state-of-the-art methods (<em>penalized baseline correction</em>) that easily admit the incorporation of a priori analyte concentrations such that predictions can be enhanced. This modified approach will be deemed <em>supervised and penalized baseline correction</em> (SPBC). Performance will be assessed on two near infrared data sets across both classical penalized baseline correction methods (without analyte information) and modified penalized baseline correction methods (leveraging analyte information). There are cases of SPBC that provide useful baseline-corrected signals such that they outperform state-of-the-art penalized baseline correction algorithms such as AIRPLS. In particular, we observe that performance is conditional on the correlation between separate analytes: the analyte used for baseline correlation and the analyte used for prediction—the greater the correlation between the analyte used for baseline correlation and the analyte used for prediction, the better the prediction performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743924001400\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743924001400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光谱测量可显示由吸收和散射混合产生的扭曲光谱形状。这些扭曲(或基线)通常表现为非恒定偏移或低频振荡。因此,这些基线会对分析和定量结果产生不利影响。基线校正是一个总称,是指应用预处理方法获取基线光谱(不需要的失真),然后通过差分去除失真。然而,目前最先进的基线校正方法并不利用分析物浓度,即使分析物浓度可用,或者即使分析物浓度对观测到的光谱变异性有重大影响。我们对一类最先进的方法(惩罚性基线校正)进行了修改,使其能够轻松地纳入先验分析物浓度,从而提高预测结果。这种修改后的方法将被视为监督和惩罚基线校正(SPBC)。我们将在两个近红外数据集上对经典的惩罚基线校正方法(无分析物信息)和改进的惩罚基线校正方法(利用分析物信息)进行性能评估。在某些情况下,SPBC 可以提供有用的基线校正信号,从而优于 AIRPLS 等最先进的惩罚性基线校正算法。我们特别注意到,性能取决于不同分析物之间的相关性:用于基线相关的分析物和用于预测的分析物--用于基线相关的分析物和用于预测的分析物之间的相关性越大,预测性能越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervised and penalized baseline correction

Spectroscopic measurements can show distorted spectral shapes arising from a mixture of absorbing and scattering contributions. These distortions (or baselines) often manifest themselves as non-constant offsets or low-frequency oscillations. As a result, these baselines can adversely affect analytical and quantitative results. Baseline correction is an umbrella term where one applies pre-processing methods to obtain baseline spectra (the unwanted distortions) and then remove the distortions by differencing. However, current state-of-the art baseline correction methods do not utilize analyte concentrations even if they are available, or even if they contribute significantly to the observed spectral variability. We modify a class of state-of-the-art methods (penalized baseline correction) that easily admit the incorporation of a priori analyte concentrations such that predictions can be enhanced. This modified approach will be deemed supervised and penalized baseline correction (SPBC). Performance will be assessed on two near infrared data sets across both classical penalized baseline correction methods (without analyte information) and modified penalized baseline correction methods (leveraging analyte information). There are cases of SPBC that provide useful baseline-corrected signals such that they outperform state-of-the-art penalized baseline correction algorithms such as AIRPLS. In particular, we observe that performance is conditional on the correlation between separate analytes: the analyte used for baseline correlation and the analyte used for prediction—the greater the correlation between the analyte used for baseline correlation and the analyte used for prediction, the better the prediction performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
169
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems publishes original research papers, short communications, reviews, tutorials and Original Software Publications reporting on development of novel statistical, mathematical, or computer techniques in Chemistry and related disciplines. Chemometrics is the chemical discipline that uses mathematical and statistical methods to design or select optimal procedures and experiments, and to provide maximum chemical information by analysing chemical data. The journal deals with the following topics: 1) Development of new statistical, mathematical and chemometrical methods for Chemistry and related fields (Environmental Chemistry, Biochemistry, Toxicology, System Biology, -Omics, etc.) 2) Novel applications of chemometrics to all branches of Chemistry and related fields (typical domains of interest are: process data analysis, experimental design, data mining, signal processing, supervised modelling, decision making, robust statistics, mixture analysis, multivariate calibration etc.) Routine applications of established chemometrical techniques will not be considered. 3) Development of new software that provides novel tools or truly advances the use of chemometrical methods. 4) Well characterized data sets to test performance for the new methods and software. The journal complies with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors'' Uniform requirements for manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信