肝移植后急性肾损伤的预测模型:系统回顾与批判性评估

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jingying Huang , Jiaojiao Chen , Jin Yang , Mengbo Han , Zihao Xue , Yina Wang , Miaomiao Xu , Haiou Qi , Yuting Wang
{"title":"肝移植后急性肾损伤的预测模型:系统回顾与批判性评估","authors":"Jingying Huang ,&nbsp;Jiaojiao Chen ,&nbsp;Jin Yang ,&nbsp;Mengbo Han ,&nbsp;Zihao Xue ,&nbsp;Yina Wang ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Xu ,&nbsp;Haiou Qi ,&nbsp;Yuting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Data source</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Systematic review of observational studies.</p></div><div><h3>Extraction methods</h3><p>Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models’ applicability.</p></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><p>Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A <em>meta</em>-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><p>The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939/pdfft?md5=a2b02115436864972c63a8125f83ebbe&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001939-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction models for acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: A systematic review and critical appraisal\",\"authors\":\"Jingying Huang ,&nbsp;Jiaojiao Chen ,&nbsp;Jin Yang ,&nbsp;Mengbo Han ,&nbsp;Zihao Xue ,&nbsp;Yina Wang ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Xu ,&nbsp;Haiou Qi ,&nbsp;Yuting Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Data source</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Systematic review of observational studies.</p></div><div><h3>Extraction methods</h3><p>Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models’ applicability.</p></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><p>Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A <em>meta</em>-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><p>The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939/pdfft?md5=a2b02115436864972c63a8125f83ebbe&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001939-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对肝移植后急性肾损伤现有预测模型的偏倚风险和适用性进行系统回顾和批判性评估:研究设计对观察性研究进行系统综述。提取方法文献筛选和数据提取由两名研究人员独立进行,他们使用了为系统综述中预测模型研究的批判性评估而设计的标准化检查表。主要研究结果纳入了 30 项研究,确定了 34 个预测模型。其中 7 项研究进行了外部验证,8 项研究只进行了内部验证。有三个模型同时经过了内部和外部验证,其曲线下面积从 0.610 到 0.921 不等。对高频预测因素的荟萃分析发现了几个具有统计学意义的因素,包括受体体重指数、终末期肝病模型评分、术前白蛋白水平、国际正常化比率以及冷缺血时间等手术相关因素。结论利用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具进行的评估表明,目前的肝移植术后急性肾损伤预测模型存在相当大的偏倚风险。对临床实践的启示认识到现有模型的高偏倚性要求未来的研究采用严格的方法和可靠的数据来源,旨在开发和验证更准确、更适用于临床的肝移植术后急性肾损伤预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction models for acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: A systematic review and critical appraisal

Objective

This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.

Data source

A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP.

Study design

Systematic review of observational studies.

Extraction methods

Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models’ applicability.

Principal findings

Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A meta-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting.

Conclusions

The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.

Implications for Clinical Practice

The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信