银行平台发展带来的包容性与脆弱性的对立统一

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Piotr Łasak, Sławomir Wyciślak
{"title":"银行平台发展带来的包容性与脆弱性的对立统一","authors":"Piotr Łasak,&nbsp;Sławomir Wyciślak","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The processes of digitalization transform the current banking sectors. Digitalization and the increasing role of FinTech are driving the platformization of banking services, affecting the participants involved in their development and operation. This article examines the relationship between capturing value by different banking platforms' participants and the process of their inclusivity and associated vulnerability. The conflict of basic goals is analyzed through the lens of Paradox Theory. Our contribution is a theoretical model that helps understand how the banking platform's inclusiveness leads to value co-creation while introducing vulnerabilities. The governance structure is essential for the context of value co-creation in banking platforms. The model of governance defines the relations between different platform co-creators and their inclusiveness in a particular model. This research refers to the European Union financial market. The motivation for this focus is the regulatory solutions, embracing open banking and open finance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for shaping future policies and ensuring the sustainable development of banking platforms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 102536"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295/pdfft?md5=10e11837409743b849ea39412631920d&pid=1-s2.0-S0275531924003295-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dichotomy of inclusiveness and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Łasak,&nbsp;Sławomir Wyciślak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The processes of digitalization transform the current banking sectors. Digitalization and the increasing role of FinTech are driving the platformization of banking services, affecting the participants involved in their development and operation. This article examines the relationship between capturing value by different banking platforms' participants and the process of their inclusivity and associated vulnerability. The conflict of basic goals is analyzed through the lens of Paradox Theory. Our contribution is a theoretical model that helps understand how the banking platform's inclusiveness leads to value co-creation while introducing vulnerabilities. The governance structure is essential for the context of value co-creation in banking platforms. The model of governance defines the relations between different platform co-creators and their inclusiveness in a particular model. This research refers to the European Union financial market. The motivation for this focus is the regulatory solutions, embracing open banking and open finance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for shaping future policies and ensuring the sustainable development of banking platforms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295/pdfft?md5=10e11837409743b849ea39412631920d&pid=1-s2.0-S0275531924003295-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字化进程改变了当前的银行业。数字化和金融科技(FinTech)日益重要的作用正在推动银行服务的平台化,并影响着参与其开发和运营的参与者。本文探讨了不同银行平台参与者获取价值与平台包容性和相关脆弱性之间的关系。文章从悖论理论的角度分析了基本目标之间的冲突。我们的贡献在于建立了一个理论模型,有助于理解银行平台的包容性如何在带来脆弱性的同时实现价值共创。治理结构对银行平台的价值共创至关重要。治理模式定义了不同平台共同创造者之间的关系及其在特定模式中的包容性。本研究涉及欧盟金融市场。关注这一问题的动机是监管解决方案,拥抱开放银行和开放金融。了解这些动态对于制定未来政策和确保银行平台的可持续发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dichotomy of inclusiveness and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development

The processes of digitalization transform the current banking sectors. Digitalization and the increasing role of FinTech are driving the platformization of banking services, affecting the participants involved in their development and operation. This article examines the relationship between capturing value by different banking platforms' participants and the process of their inclusivity and associated vulnerability. The conflict of basic goals is analyzed through the lens of Paradox Theory. Our contribution is a theoretical model that helps understand how the banking platform's inclusiveness leads to value co-creation while introducing vulnerabilities. The governance structure is essential for the context of value co-creation in banking platforms. The model of governance defines the relations between different platform co-creators and their inclusiveness in a particular model. This research refers to the European Union financial market. The motivation for this focus is the regulatory solutions, embracing open banking and open finance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for shaping future policies and ensuring the sustainable development of banking platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信