{"title":"银行平台发展带来的包容性与脆弱性的对立统一","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The processes of digitalization transform the current banking sectors. Digitalization and the increasing role of FinTech are driving the platformization of banking services, affecting the participants involved in their development and operation. This article examines the relationship between capturing value by different banking platforms' participants and the process of their inclusivity and associated vulnerability. The conflict of basic goals is analyzed through the lens of Paradox Theory. Our contribution is a theoretical model that helps understand how the banking platform's inclusiveness leads to value co-creation while introducing vulnerabilities. The governance structure is essential for the context of value co-creation in banking platforms. The model of governance defines the relations between different platform co-creators and their inclusiveness in a particular model. This research refers to the European Union financial market. The motivation for this focus is the regulatory solutions, embracing open banking and open finance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for shaping future policies and ensuring the sustainable development of banking platforms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295/pdfft?md5=10e11837409743b849ea39412631920d&pid=1-s2.0-S0275531924003295-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dichotomy of inclusiveness and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The processes of digitalization transform the current banking sectors. Digitalization and the increasing role of FinTech are driving the platformization of banking services, affecting the participants involved in their development and operation. This article examines the relationship between capturing value by different banking platforms' participants and the process of their inclusivity and associated vulnerability. The conflict of basic goals is analyzed through the lens of Paradox Theory. Our contribution is a theoretical model that helps understand how the banking platform's inclusiveness leads to value co-creation while introducing vulnerabilities. The governance structure is essential for the context of value co-creation in banking platforms. The model of governance defines the relations between different platform co-creators and their inclusiveness in a particular model. This research refers to the European Union financial market. The motivation for this focus is the regulatory solutions, embracing open banking and open finance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for shaping future policies and ensuring the sustainable development of banking platforms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295/pdfft?md5=10e11837409743b849ea39412631920d&pid=1-s2.0-S0275531924003295-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924003295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The dichotomy of inclusiveness and vulnerability as a consequence of banking platform development
The processes of digitalization transform the current banking sectors. Digitalization and the increasing role of FinTech are driving the platformization of banking services, affecting the participants involved in their development and operation. This article examines the relationship between capturing value by different banking platforms' participants and the process of their inclusivity and associated vulnerability. The conflict of basic goals is analyzed through the lens of Paradox Theory. Our contribution is a theoretical model that helps understand how the banking platform's inclusiveness leads to value co-creation while introducing vulnerabilities. The governance structure is essential for the context of value co-creation in banking platforms. The model of governance defines the relations between different platform co-creators and their inclusiveness in a particular model. This research refers to the European Union financial market. The motivation for this focus is the regulatory solutions, embracing open banking and open finance. Understanding these dynamics is essential for shaping future policies and ensuring the sustainable development of banking platforms.
期刊介绍：
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
