从研究性阅读和实践到研究性使用:追踪成为研究型第二语言教师的轨迹

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mehrdad Hosseini , Vahid Bahrami , Kenan Dikilitaş
{"title":"从研究性阅读和实践到研究性使用:追踪成为研究型第二语言教师的轨迹","authors":"Mehrdad Hosseini ,&nbsp;Vahid Bahrami ,&nbsp;Kenan Dikilitaş","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the crucial role of teachers in connecting research to classroom practices, very little is known about the processes of research-informed practice through their reading, doing, and use of research. Also largely unknown is how the potential interconnections among these activities could influence teachers’ evaluations of research relevance and sustainability of their research-informed practice. This study, therefore, explores trajectories of teachers in adopting research-informed practice. Relying on an ecological theoretical lens through a narrative case study approach, we collected data from three in-service EFL teachers using in-depth individual interviews, multiple follow-ups, teacher-generated research logs, and researcher-made analytic memos. Data analysis revealed specific starting conditions (e.g., subject-matter explorations) for development of rudimentary familiarity, turning moments (e.g., developmental thresholds) giving rise to more sophisticated reception, and bottlenecks (e.g., disciplinary identity) for sustained involvement in research-informed-practice for teachers. Furthermore, on top of cyclical links among reading, doing, and use of research, we found perceived signature patterns of reading (i.e., empirical papers), doing (i.e., action research), or use (i.e., successful classroom application) for each teacher, as evidence for threshold crossing. Implications for theory and research, professional development, and policymaking, including key prerequisites that must be provisioned to prepare teachers for research-informed practice, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 103445"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002276/pdfft?md5=03bbfff7ddcf728f231ca7fa32b5162d&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002276-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From research reading and doing to research use: Tracking trajectories of becoming research-informed second language teachers\",\"authors\":\"Mehrdad Hosseini ,&nbsp;Vahid Bahrami ,&nbsp;Kenan Dikilitaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2024.103445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the crucial role of teachers in connecting research to classroom practices, very little is known about the processes of research-informed practice through their reading, doing, and use of research. Also largely unknown is how the potential interconnections among these activities could influence teachers’ evaluations of research relevance and sustainability of their research-informed practice. This study, therefore, explores trajectories of teachers in adopting research-informed practice. Relying on an ecological theoretical lens through a narrative case study approach, we collected data from three in-service EFL teachers using in-depth individual interviews, multiple follow-ups, teacher-generated research logs, and researcher-made analytic memos. Data analysis revealed specific starting conditions (e.g., subject-matter explorations) for development of rudimentary familiarity, turning moments (e.g., developmental thresholds) giving rise to more sophisticated reception, and bottlenecks (e.g., disciplinary identity) for sustained involvement in research-informed-practice for teachers. Furthermore, on top of cyclical links among reading, doing, and use of research, we found perceived signature patterns of reading (i.e., empirical papers), doing (i.e., action research), or use (i.e., successful classroom application) for each teacher, as evidence for threshold crossing. Implications for theory and research, professional development, and policymaking, including key prerequisites that must be provisioned to prepare teachers for research-informed practice, are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002276/pdfft?md5=03bbfff7ddcf728f231ca7fa32b5162d&pid=1-s2.0-S0346251X24002276-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002276\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管教师在将研究与课堂实践联系起来方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但人们对教 师通过阅读、实践和使用研究成果来开展研究性实践的过程却知之甚少。此外,这些活动之间的潜在联系会如何影响教师对研究相关性的评价,以及他们在研究指导下的实践活动的可持续性,也是一个很大的未知数。因此,本研究探讨了教师采用研究性实践的轨迹。基于生态学理论视角,我们采用叙事性案例研究方法,通过深入的个别访谈、多次跟踪、教师撰写的研究日志和研究人员制作的分析备忘录,收集了三位在职英语教师的数据。数据分析揭示了教师发展初步熟悉的特定起始条件(如学科探索)、产生更复杂接受的转折点(如发展阈值)以及持续参与研究实践的瓶颈(如学科认同)。此外,除了阅读、实践和使用研究之间的周期性联系之外,我们还发现每位教师在阅读(即经验性论文)、实践(即行动研究)或使用(即成功的课堂应用)方面的感知特征模式,作为跨越阈值的证据。本文讨论了对理论与研究、专业发展和政策制定的影响,包括必须为教师的研究性实践做好准备的关键先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From research reading and doing to research use: Tracking trajectories of becoming research-informed second language teachers

Despite the crucial role of teachers in connecting research to classroom practices, very little is known about the processes of research-informed practice through their reading, doing, and use of research. Also largely unknown is how the potential interconnections among these activities could influence teachers’ evaluations of research relevance and sustainability of their research-informed practice. This study, therefore, explores trajectories of teachers in adopting research-informed practice. Relying on an ecological theoretical lens through a narrative case study approach, we collected data from three in-service EFL teachers using in-depth individual interviews, multiple follow-ups, teacher-generated research logs, and researcher-made analytic memos. Data analysis revealed specific starting conditions (e.g., subject-matter explorations) for development of rudimentary familiarity, turning moments (e.g., developmental thresholds) giving rise to more sophisticated reception, and bottlenecks (e.g., disciplinary identity) for sustained involvement in research-informed-practice for teachers. Furthermore, on top of cyclical links among reading, doing, and use of research, we found perceived signature patterns of reading (i.e., empirical papers), doing (i.e., action research), or use (i.e., successful classroom application) for each teacher, as evidence for threshold crossing. Implications for theory and research, professional development, and policymaking, including key prerequisites that must be provisioned to prepare teachers for research-informed practice, are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信