Marvin Jeffrey Jansen , Nadia Hartman , David Grant
{"title":"在南非院内环境中管理成人患者急症护理病例的本科生急症护理临床能力:改良德尔菲研究","authors":"Marvin Jeffrey Jansen , Nadia Hartman , David Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by “Strong Agreement”; 16 (13.3%) reached by “Agreement”; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 231-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338/pdfft?md5=63618025b2b1f6da0e5f6e0324953606&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X24000338-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate acute care clinical competencies for managing acute care cases in adult patients within a South African in-hospital environment: A modified Delphi Study\",\"authors\":\"Marvin Jeffrey Jansen , Nadia Hartman , David Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by “Strong Agreement”; 16 (13.3%) reached by “Agreement”; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 231-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338/pdfft?md5=63618025b2b1f6da0e5f6e0324953606&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X24000338-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Undergraduate acute care clinical competencies for managing acute care cases in adult patients within a South African in-hospital environment: A modified Delphi Study
Introduction
With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment.
Methodology
The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two.
Results
A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by “Strong Agreement”; 16 (13.3%) reached by “Agreement”; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided.
Discussion
The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process.
Conclusion
The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.