在南非院内环境中管理成人患者急症护理病例的本科生急症护理临床能力:改良德尔菲研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Marvin Jeffrey Jansen , Nadia Hartman , David Grant
{"title":"在南非院内环境中管理成人患者急症护理病例的本科生急症护理临床能力:改良德尔菲研究","authors":"Marvin Jeffrey Jansen ,&nbsp;Nadia Hartman ,&nbsp;David Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by “Strong Agreement”; 16 (13.3%) reached by “Agreement”; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 231-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338/pdfft?md5=63618025b2b1f6da0e5f6e0324953606&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X24000338-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate acute care clinical competencies for managing acute care cases in adult patients within a South African in-hospital environment: A modified Delphi Study\",\"authors\":\"Marvin Jeffrey Jansen ,&nbsp;Nadia Hartman ,&nbsp;David Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by “Strong Agreement”; 16 (13.3%) reached by “Agreement”; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 231-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338/pdfft?md5=63618025b2b1f6da0e5f6e0324953606&pid=1-s2.0-S2211419X24000338-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X24000338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言随着全球人口的增加,本地和全球对急症护理服务的需求也在增加。由于南非缺乏以急症护理能力为基础的课程,本研究试图确定医科本科生在南非医院环境中安全管理急症护理环境中的成人患者所需的核心能力。传统的德尔菲法在不同轮次中使用相同的参与者,而改良后的德尔菲法在三轮中使用了不同的利益相关者。急诊医学(EM)专科受训者(注册医师)在第一轮中提出能力要求,第二轮中提供给具有本科课程开发专业知识的多学科团队,采用 5 点李克特量表对他们的同意-不同意程度进行评分。第三轮需要邀请第一轮的贡献者通过在线调查对第二轮产生的能力进行匿名评论。结果 共有 34 名急诊科注册医师参与了第一轮,7 名课程开发专家参与了第二轮。通过三轮德尔菲研究,共确定了 120 项能力;其中 103 项(85.8%)达成 "非常同意";16 项(13.3%)达成 "同意";1 项(0.8%)未确定。讨论修改后的德尔菲研究结果有助于制定一份全面的、以南非为背景的本科急症护理临床能力清单。在南非的医疗环境中,医疗从业人员每天都要面对社会的医疗需求,因此,与他们一起参与急症护理前沿工作的价值显而易见。本研究的结果强调并加强了课程开发过程中背景相关性的重要性。结论在三轮反复讨论和专家反馈的基础上,修改后的德尔菲法有效地就医科本科生在南非医院环境中安全管理急症成人患者所需的能力达成了共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undergraduate acute care clinical competencies for managing acute care cases in adult patients within a South African in-hospital environment: A modified Delphi Study

Introduction

With the increase of global population, there has been an increased demand for acute care services both locally and globally. In the absence of an acute care competency-based curriculum in South Africa, this study sought to identify the core competencies required by undergraduate medical students to safely manage adult patients within an acute care setting in a South African hospital environment.

Methodology

The modified Delphi study comprised of three rounds. The traditional Delphi method, which uses the same participants across various rounds, was modified by using different stakeholders across the three rounds. Emergency Medicine (EM) specialist trainees (registrars) generated competencies in round one, which were provided to a multi-disciplinary team with expertise in undergraduate curriculum development in round two, using a 5-point Likert scale for rating their agreement-disagreement. Round three entailed inviting the round one contributors to anonymously comment, via online survey, on the competencies generated in round two.

Results

A total of 34 EM registrars participated during round one and 7 curriculum development experts participated during round two. A total of 120 competencies were identified from the 3-round Delphi study; of these 103 (85.8%) were reached by “Strong Agreement”; 16 (13.3%) reached by “Agreement”; and 1 (0.8%) was undecided.

Discussion

The results of the modified Delphi study contributed to developing a comprehensive list of undergraduate acute care clinical competencies set in a South African context. The value of engaging with medical practitioners at the forefront of delivering acute care in a South African healthcare environment who are exposed on a daily basis to the healthcare needs of society, became evident. The findings of this study highlight and reinforce the importance of contextual relevance during the curriculum development process.

Conclusion

The modified Delphi method, based on three iterative rounds and feedback from experts, was effective in reaching consensus on the competencies required by undergraduate medical students to manage acute care adult patients safely within a South African hospital environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信