{"title":"注册护士和助产士预科课程中的 LGBTQIA+ 医疗保健内容:横断面研究","authors":"Mengting Huang, Jacqueline Allen, Ensieh Fooladi","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses and midwives are expected to provide inclusive care for LGBTQIA+ populations. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how well-prepared nursing and midwifery graduates are for this aspect of their role.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore LGBTQIA+ content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Australian higher education institutions offering 86 pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Publicly available pre-registration nursing and midwifery course programs in Australia as presented in the online course handbooks of 25 randomly selected educational institutions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A LGBTQIA+ terminology matrix was developed to guide data extraction from subject titles, synopses, and learning outcomes. Explicit terms were those strongly associated with LGBTQIA+. Implicit terms were those indirectly associated with LGBTQIA+. Explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terms were analyzed for frequencies. Poisson regression was used to compare counts of LGBTQIA+ terms by course, subject, and university.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 1093 subjects, no subject titles included explicit terms and 6 (0.55 %) titles included implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was identified in 54 (4.9 %) subject synopses and implicit terminology was found in 323 (29.6 %) subject synopses. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terms were identified in 14 (1.3 %) learning outcomes while implicit terms were found in 323 (29.6 %) learning outcomes. Group of Eight universities were more likely to use explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology than non-Group of Eight universities (<em>p</em> < 0.001; <em>p</em> = 0.035). Undergraduate programs included more LGBTQIA+ terminology than postgraduate programs (<em>p</em> = 0.019; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Core subjects were more likely to include LGBTQIA+ content than elective subjects (p < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was minimal indicating limited overall content. The study results alert nursing and midwifery educators to take a targeted approach to teaching and learning with a LGBTQIA+ focus to support future nurses and midwives with quality knowledge and skills and ensure equitable and safe care for LGBTQIA+ people.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 106363"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739/pdfft?md5=2ae3795a884c5babe8ece300f57371de&pid=1-s2.0-S0260691724002739-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LGBTQIA+ healthcare content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Mengting Huang, Jacqueline Allen, Ensieh Fooladi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses and midwives are expected to provide inclusive care for LGBTQIA+ populations. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how well-prepared nursing and midwifery graduates are for this aspect of their role.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore LGBTQIA+ content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Australian higher education institutions offering 86 pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Publicly available pre-registration nursing and midwifery course programs in Australia as presented in the online course handbooks of 25 randomly selected educational institutions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A LGBTQIA+ terminology matrix was developed to guide data extraction from subject titles, synopses, and learning outcomes. Explicit terms were those strongly associated with LGBTQIA+. Implicit terms were those indirectly associated with LGBTQIA+. Explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terms were analyzed for frequencies. Poisson regression was used to compare counts of LGBTQIA+ terms by course, subject, and university.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 1093 subjects, no subject titles included explicit terms and 6 (0.55 %) titles included implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was identified in 54 (4.9 %) subject synopses and implicit terminology was found in 323 (29.6 %) subject synopses. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terms were identified in 14 (1.3 %) learning outcomes while implicit terms were found in 323 (29.6 %) learning outcomes. Group of Eight universities were more likely to use explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology than non-Group of Eight universities (<em>p</em> < 0.001; <em>p</em> = 0.035). Undergraduate programs included more LGBTQIA+ terminology than postgraduate programs (<em>p</em> = 0.019; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Core subjects were more likely to include LGBTQIA+ content than elective subjects (p < 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was minimal indicating limited overall content. The study results alert nursing and midwifery educators to take a targeted approach to teaching and learning with a LGBTQIA+ focus to support future nurses and midwives with quality knowledge and skills and ensure equitable and safe care for LGBTQIA+ people.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739/pdfft?md5=2ae3795a884c5babe8ece300f57371de&pid=1-s2.0-S0260691724002739-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
LGBTQIA+ healthcare content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula: A cross-sectional study
Background
Nurses and midwives are expected to provide inclusive care for LGBTQIA+ populations. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how well-prepared nursing and midwifery graduates are for this aspect of their role.
Aim
To explore LGBTQIA+ content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Settings
Australian higher education institutions offering 86 pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs.
Sample
Publicly available pre-registration nursing and midwifery course programs in Australia as presented in the online course handbooks of 25 randomly selected educational institutions.
Methods
A LGBTQIA+ terminology matrix was developed to guide data extraction from subject titles, synopses, and learning outcomes. Explicit terms were those strongly associated with LGBTQIA+. Implicit terms were those indirectly associated with LGBTQIA+. Explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terms were analyzed for frequencies. Poisson regression was used to compare counts of LGBTQIA+ terms by course, subject, and university.
Results
Among the 1093 subjects, no subject titles included explicit terms and 6 (0.55 %) titles included implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was identified in 54 (4.9 %) subject synopses and implicit terminology was found in 323 (29.6 %) subject synopses. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terms were identified in 14 (1.3 %) learning outcomes while implicit terms were found in 323 (29.6 %) learning outcomes. Group of Eight universities were more likely to use explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology than non-Group of Eight universities (p < 0.001; p = 0.035). Undergraduate programs included more LGBTQIA+ terminology than postgraduate programs (p = 0.019; p < 0.001). Core subjects were more likely to include LGBTQIA+ content than elective subjects (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was minimal indicating limited overall content. The study results alert nursing and midwifery educators to take a targeted approach to teaching and learning with a LGBTQIA+ focus to support future nurses and midwives with quality knowledge and skills and ensure equitable and safe care for LGBTQIA+ people.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.