从课文中学习的反馈:什么样的反馈最有效?

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Virginia Clinton-Lisell
{"title":"从课文中学习的反馈:什么样的反馈最有效?","authors":"Virginia Clinton-Lisell","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Etextbooks have the affordance of providing immediate feedback for review questions on the content. However, it needs to be clarified what type and placement of feedback is most effective. College and high school students (<em>N</em> = 390) were randomly assigned to receive either correct-answer-only feedback or elaborative feedback either in the middle-and-end of the textbook excerpt or the end only. Elaborative feedback at the end of the text had more accurate posttest scores and more efficient learning (based on time reading per correct answer) than did other conditions. Metacomprehension accuracy, based on the difference between predicted performance and actual performance, did not reliably differ by condition. Neither the perceived difficulty of the text nor the review questions reliably differed based on feedback condition. This study has practical implications for the design of etextbooks provided the findings generalize across disciplines and entire etextbooks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000569/pdfft?md5=5062796e3c15f5f2dcca6808ce9ae7ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000569-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feedback for learning from text: What kind and where in the text is most effective?\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Clinton-Lisell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Etextbooks have the affordance of providing immediate feedback for review questions on the content. However, it needs to be clarified what type and placement of feedback is most effective. College and high school students (<em>N</em> = 390) were randomly assigned to receive either correct-answer-only feedback or elaborative feedback either in the middle-and-end of the textbook excerpt or the end only. Elaborative feedback at the end of the text had more accurate posttest scores and more efficient learning (based on time reading per correct answer) than did other conditions. Metacomprehension accuracy, based on the difference between predicted performance and actual performance, did not reliably differ by condition. Neither the perceived difficulty of the text nor the review questions reliably differed based on feedback condition. This study has practical implications for the design of etextbooks provided the findings generalize across disciplines and entire etextbooks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000569/pdfft?md5=5062796e3c15f5f2dcca6808ce9ae7ea&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000569-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子教科书可以为复习内容的问题提供即时反馈。然而,需要明确哪种类型和位置的反馈最有效。大中学生(390 人)被随机分配到只接受正确答案反馈或在课文节选的中间和末尾或只在末尾接受详细反馈。与其他条件相比,课文末尾的详细反馈在测验后的得分更准确,学习效率更高(基于每个正确答案的阅读时间)。根据预测成绩和实际成绩之间的差异计算的元理解准确率在不同条件下没有可靠的差异。在不同的反馈条件下,文本和复习题的难度感知都没有可靠的差异。这项研究对电子课本的设计具有实际意义,但前提是研究结果能在不同学科和整本电子课本中推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feedback for learning from text: What kind and where in the text is most effective?

Feedback for learning from text: What kind and where in the text is most effective?

Etextbooks have the affordance of providing immediate feedback for review questions on the content. However, it needs to be clarified what type and placement of feedback is most effective. College and high school students (N = 390) were randomly assigned to receive either correct-answer-only feedback or elaborative feedback either in the middle-and-end of the textbook excerpt or the end only. Elaborative feedback at the end of the text had more accurate posttest scores and more efficient learning (based on time reading per correct answer) than did other conditions. Metacomprehension accuracy, based on the difference between predicted performance and actual performance, did not reliably differ by condition. Neither the perceived difficulty of the text nor the review questions reliably differed based on feedback condition. This study has practical implications for the design of etextbooks provided the findings generalize across disciplines and entire etextbooks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信