慢性哮喘的enprofyline

B.J. Chapman , C. McDonald , S. Capewell , M.H. Frame , G.K. Crompton
{"title":"慢性哮喘的enprofyline","authors":"B.J. Chapman ,&nbsp;C. McDonald ,&nbsp;S. Capewell ,&nbsp;M.H. Frame ,&nbsp;G.K. Crompton","doi":"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90088-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A double-blind crossover study has been performed in 14 patients with moderately severe chronic asthma to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of two dosage regimens of intravenous enprofylline (high dose=2 mg/kg bolus and 1 mg/kg/hour infusion; low dose=1 mg/kg bolus and 500 μg/kg/hour infusion) with aminophylline (5 mg/kg/bolus and 500 μg/kg/hour infusion) and placebo. The bolus injections were given over 20 minutes and infusion over 160 minutes. Twelve subjects completed the study. High dose enprofylline was more effective than aminophylline in increasing PEF (<em>P</em>=0.008) and FEV<sub>1</sub> (<em>P</em>=0.004). Low dose enprofylline and aminophylline were of similar efficacy. Side-effects, notably headaches and nausea, were more common with enprofylline; three out of 14 subjects receiving the high dose regimen developed severe nausea. The plasma enprofylline levels achieved with the high dose regimen were greater than anticipated. Further studies are required in acute severe asthma to clarify the therapeutic role of intravenous enprofylline and the most appropriate dosage regimen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75618,"journal":{"name":"British journal of diseases of the chest","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 354-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90088-5","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enprofylline in chronic asthma\",\"authors\":\"B.J. Chapman ,&nbsp;C. McDonald ,&nbsp;S. Capewell ,&nbsp;M.H. Frame ,&nbsp;G.K. Crompton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90088-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A double-blind crossover study has been performed in 14 patients with moderately severe chronic asthma to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of two dosage regimens of intravenous enprofylline (high dose=2 mg/kg bolus and 1 mg/kg/hour infusion; low dose=1 mg/kg bolus and 500 μg/kg/hour infusion) with aminophylline (5 mg/kg/bolus and 500 μg/kg/hour infusion) and placebo. The bolus injections were given over 20 minutes and infusion over 160 minutes. Twelve subjects completed the study. High dose enprofylline was more effective than aminophylline in increasing PEF (<em>P</em>=0.008) and FEV<sub>1</sub> (<em>P</em>=0.004). Low dose enprofylline and aminophylline were of similar efficacy. Side-effects, notably headaches and nausea, were more common with enprofylline; three out of 14 subjects receiving the high dose regimen developed severe nausea. The plasma enprofylline levels achieved with the high dose regimen were greater than anticipated. Further studies are required in acute severe asthma to clarify the therapeutic role of intravenous enprofylline and the most appropriate dosage regimen.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 354-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90088-5\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of diseases of the chest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在14例中重度慢性哮喘患者中进行了一项双盲交叉研究,以比较静脉注射enprofylline两种剂量方案(高剂量= 2mg /kg丸和1mg /kg/小时输注;低剂量=1 mg/kg丸,500 μg/kg/小时输注),氨茶碱(5 mg/kg丸,500 μg/kg/小时输注)和安慰剂。注射时间为20分钟,输注时间为160分钟。12名受试者完成了这项研究。高剂量enprofylline在提高PEF (P=0.008)和FEV1 (P=0.004)方面比氨茶碱更有效。低剂量enprofyline与氨茶碱疗效相近。副作用,尤其是头痛和恶心,在enprofylline中更为常见;接受高剂量方案的14名受试者中有3人出现了严重的恶心。高剂量组血浆enprofylline水平高于预期。急性重症哮喘需要进一步的研究来阐明静脉注射enprofylline的治疗作用和最合适的给药方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enprofylline in chronic asthma

A double-blind crossover study has been performed in 14 patients with moderately severe chronic asthma to compare the bronchodilator efficacy of two dosage regimens of intravenous enprofylline (high dose=2 mg/kg bolus and 1 mg/kg/hour infusion; low dose=1 mg/kg bolus and 500 μg/kg/hour infusion) with aminophylline (5 mg/kg/bolus and 500 μg/kg/hour infusion) and placebo. The bolus injections were given over 20 minutes and infusion over 160 minutes. Twelve subjects completed the study. High dose enprofylline was more effective than aminophylline in increasing PEF (P=0.008) and FEV1 (P=0.004). Low dose enprofylline and aminophylline were of similar efficacy. Side-effects, notably headaches and nausea, were more common with enprofylline; three out of 14 subjects receiving the high dose regimen developed severe nausea. The plasma enprofylline levels achieved with the high dose regimen were greater than anticipated. Further studies are required in acute severe asthma to clarify the therapeutic role of intravenous enprofylline and the most appropriate dosage regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信