2005-2020 年新南威尔士州急性心肌梗死住院后的非指数再入院率与地理偏远程度:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Md Shajedur Rahman Shawon, Jennifer Yu, Art Sedrakyan, Sze-Yuan Ooi, Louisa Jorm
{"title":"2005-2020 年新南威尔士州急性心肌梗死住院后的非指数再入院率与地理偏远程度:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Md Shajedur Rahman Shawon,&nbsp;Jennifer Yu,&nbsp;Art Sedrakyan,&nbsp;Sze-Yuan Ooi,&nbsp;Louisa Jorm","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the frequency of re-admissions to non-index hospitals (hospitals other than the initial discharging hospital) within 30 days of admission with acute myocardial infarction in New South Wales; to examine the relationship between non-index hospital re-admissions and 30-day mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study; analysis of hospital admissions (Admitted Patient Data Collection) and mortality data (Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\n \n <p>Adults admitted to NSW hospitals with acute myocardial infarction re-admitted to any hospital within 30 days of discharge from the initial hospitalisation, 1 January 2005 – 31 December 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Proportion of re-admissions within 30 days of discharge to non-index hospitals, and associations of non-index hospital re-admissions with demographic and initial hospitalisation characteristics and with 30-day and 12-month mortality, each by residential remoteness category.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 168 097 people with acute myocardial infarction discharged alive, 28 309 (16.8%) were re-admitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, including 11 986 to non-index hospitals (42.3%); the proportion was larger for people from regional or remote areas (50.1%) than for people from major cities (38.3%). The odds of non-index hospital re-admission were higher for people with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for people whose index admissions were to private hospitals, who were transferred between hospitals or had undergone revascularisation during the initial admission, were under 65 years of age, or had private health insurance; the influence of these factors was generally larger for people from regional or remote areas than for those from large cities. After adjustment for potential confounders, non-index hospital re-admission did not influence mortality among people from major cities (30-day: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.20; 12-month: aOR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.93–1.03), but was associated with reduced mortality for people from regional or remote areas (30-day: aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.95; 12-month: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81–0.96).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The geographically dispersed Australian population and the mixed public and private provision of specialist services means that re-admission to a non-index hospital can be unavoidable for people with acute myocardial infarction who are initially transferred to specialised facilities. Non-index hospital re-admission is associated with better mortality outcomes for people from regional or remote areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 6","pages":"310-316"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-index hospital re-admissions after hospitalisation with acute myocardial infarction and geographic remoteness, New South Wales, 2005–2020: a retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Md Shajedur Rahman Shawon,&nbsp;Jennifer Yu,&nbsp;Art Sedrakyan,&nbsp;Sze-Yuan Ooi,&nbsp;Louisa Jorm\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.52420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the frequency of re-admissions to non-index hospitals (hospitals other than the initial discharging hospital) within 30 days of admission with acute myocardial infarction in New South Wales; to examine the relationship between non-index hospital re-admissions and 30-day mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Retrospective cohort study; analysis of hospital admissions (Admitted Patient Data Collection) and mortality data (Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adults admitted to NSW hospitals with acute myocardial infarction re-admitted to any hospital within 30 days of discharge from the initial hospitalisation, 1 January 2005 – 31 December 2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Proportion of re-admissions within 30 days of discharge to non-index hospitals, and associations of non-index hospital re-admissions with demographic and initial hospitalisation characteristics and with 30-day and 12-month mortality, each by residential remoteness category.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 168 097 people with acute myocardial infarction discharged alive, 28 309 (16.8%) were re-admitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, including 11 986 to non-index hospitals (42.3%); the proportion was larger for people from regional or remote areas (50.1%) than for people from major cities (38.3%). The odds of non-index hospital re-admission were higher for people with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for people whose index admissions were to private hospitals, who were transferred between hospitals or had undergone revascularisation during the initial admission, were under 65 years of age, or had private health insurance; the influence of these factors was generally larger for people from regional or remote areas than for those from large cities. After adjustment for potential confounders, non-index hospital re-admission did not influence mortality among people from major cities (30-day: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.20; 12-month: aOR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.93–1.03), but was associated with reduced mortality for people from regional or remote areas (30-day: aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.95; 12-month: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81–0.96).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The geographically dispersed Australian population and the mixed public and private provision of specialist services means that re-admission to a non-index hospital can be unavoidable for people with acute myocardial infarction who are initially transferred to specialised facilities. Non-index hospital re-admission is associated with better mortality outcomes for people from regional or remote areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"221 6\",\"pages\":\"310-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52420\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52420\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究新南威尔士州急性心肌梗死患者入院后 30 天内再次入住非指标医院(非最初出院医院)的频率;研究非指标医院再次入院与 30 天死亡率之间的关系:回顾性队列研究;分析入院数据(入院患者数据收集)和死亡率数据(出生、死亡和婚姻登记):2005年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间,新南威尔士州医院收治的急性心肌梗死患者在首次住院出院后30天内再次入住任何医院:出院后30天内再次入住非指标医院的比例,以及非指标医院再次入院与人口统计学特征和首次住院特征以及30天和12个月死亡率之间的关系,按居住地偏远程度分类:在 168 097 名活着出院的急性心肌梗死患者中,有 28 309 人(16.8%)在出院后 30 天内再次入院,其中有 11 986 人(42.3%)再次入住非指标医院;来自地区或偏远地区的患者(50.1%)再次入院的比例高于来自大城市的患者(38.3%)。ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者、入院指数为私立医院的患者、转院患者或在首次入院时接受过血管重建术的患者、65岁以下的患者或拥有私人医疗保险的患者再次入院的几率更高;这些因素对地区或偏远地区患者的影响通常大于大城市患者。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,非指数再入院并不影响大城市人群的死亡率(30 天:调整后的几率比 [aOR],1.09;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.99-1.20;12 个月:aOR,1.09;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.99-1.20)。20;12 个月:aOR,0.98,95% CI,0.93-1.03),但与地区或偏远地区居民的死亡率降低有关(30 天:aOR,0.81;95% CI,0.70-0.95;12 个月:aOR,0.88;95% CI,0.81-0.96):澳大利亚人口地域分散,专科服务由公立和私立医院共同提供,这意味着急性心肌梗死患者在最初转入专科医院后,再次入住非指标医院是不可避免的。对于来自地区或偏远地区的患者来说,再次入住非指标医院与较好的死亡率结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Non-index hospital re-admissions after hospitalisation with acute myocardial infarction and geographic remoteness, New South Wales, 2005–2020: a retrospective cohort study

Non-index hospital re-admissions after hospitalisation with acute myocardial infarction and geographic remoteness, New South Wales, 2005–2020: a retrospective cohort study

Objectives

To examine the frequency of re-admissions to non-index hospitals (hospitals other than the initial discharging hospital) within 30 days of admission with acute myocardial infarction in New South Wales; to examine the relationship between non-index hospital re-admissions and 30-day mortality.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study; analysis of hospital admissions (Admitted Patient Data Collection) and mortality data (Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages).

Setting, participants

Adults admitted to NSW hospitals with acute myocardial infarction re-admitted to any hospital within 30 days of discharge from the initial hospitalisation, 1 January 2005 – 31 December 2020.

Main outcome measures

Proportion of re-admissions within 30 days of discharge to non-index hospitals, and associations of non-index hospital re-admissions with demographic and initial hospitalisation characteristics and with 30-day and 12-month mortality, each by residential remoteness category.

Results

Of 168 097 people with acute myocardial infarction discharged alive, 28 309 (16.8%) were re-admitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, including 11 986 to non-index hospitals (42.3%); the proportion was larger for people from regional or remote areas (50.1%) than for people from major cities (38.3%). The odds of non-index hospital re-admission were higher for people with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, for people whose index admissions were to private hospitals, who were transferred between hospitals or had undergone revascularisation during the initial admission, were under 65 years of age, or had private health insurance; the influence of these factors was generally larger for people from regional or remote areas than for those from large cities. After adjustment for potential confounders, non-index hospital re-admission did not influence mortality among people from major cities (30-day: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.20; 12-month: aOR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.93–1.03), but was associated with reduced mortality for people from regional or remote areas (30-day: aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.95; 12-month: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81–0.96).

Conclusions

The geographically dispersed Australian population and the mixed public and private provision of specialist services means that re-admission to a non-index hospital can be unavoidable for people with acute myocardial infarction who are initially transferred to specialised facilities. Non-index hospital re-admission is associated with better mortality outcomes for people from regional or remote areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信