免疫预后评分可预测接受双特异性抗体治疗的复发性多发性骨髓瘤患者的感染风险和生存结果。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Othman Salim Akhtar, Aniko Szabo, Vineel Bhatlapenumarthi, Mark Forsberg, Metodi Balev, Anannya Patwari, Heloise Cheruvalath, Divaya Bhutani, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan, Binod Dhakal, Maurizio Zangari, Tanvi Patel, Asis Shrestha, Samer Al-Hadidi, Dennis Cooper, Suzanne Lentzsch, Frits van Rhee, Mansi R Shah, Aishee Bag, Anita D'Souza, Carolina Schinke, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Nishi Shah, Meera Mohan
{"title":"免疫预后评分可预测接受双特异性抗体治疗的复发性多发性骨髓瘤患者的感染风险和生存结果。","authors":"Othman Salim Akhtar, Aniko Szabo, Vineel Bhatlapenumarthi, Mark Forsberg, Metodi Balev, Anannya Patwari, Heloise Cheruvalath, Divaya Bhutani, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan, Binod Dhakal, Maurizio Zangari, Tanvi Patel, Asis Shrestha, Samer Al-Hadidi, Dennis Cooper, Suzanne Lentzsch, Frits van Rhee, Mansi R Shah, Aishee Bag, Anita D'Souza, Carolina Schinke, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Nishi Shah, Meera Mohan","doi":"10.1111/bjh.19700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) score identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients at high risk for immune-mediated toxicity and early mortality with cellular immunotherapy. However, their association with outcomes in patients receiving T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) is unclear. This multi-centre retrospective study examines the association of baseline GPS and CAR-HT scores with outcomes in 126 MM patients treated with bsAb. Overall, 19% were identified as GPS high risk but did not experience increased toxicity or mortality. Conversely, high-risk CAR-HT patients had a higher incidence of infections and inferior survival, suggesting a need for aggressive infection mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune prognostic score predicts the risk of infection and survival outcomes in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Othman Salim Akhtar, Aniko Szabo, Vineel Bhatlapenumarthi, Mark Forsberg, Metodi Balev, Anannya Patwari, Heloise Cheruvalath, Divaya Bhutani, Sharmilan Thanendrarajan, Binod Dhakal, Maurizio Zangari, Tanvi Patel, Asis Shrestha, Samer Al-Hadidi, Dennis Cooper, Suzanne Lentzsch, Frits van Rhee, Mansi R Shah, Aishee Bag, Anita D'Souza, Carolina Schinke, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Nishi Shah, Meera Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.19700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) score identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients at high risk for immune-mediated toxicity and early mortality with cellular immunotherapy. However, their association with outcomes in patients receiving T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) is unclear. This multi-centre retrospective study examines the association of baseline GPS and CAR-HT scores with outcomes in 126 MM patients treated with bsAb. Overall, 19% were identified as GPS high risk but did not experience increased toxicity or mortality. Conversely, high-risk CAR-HT patients had a higher incidence of infections and inferior survival, suggesting a need for aggressive infection mitigation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19700\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)和CAR-HEMATOTOX(CAR-HT)评分可确定多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者在接受细胞免疫疗法后发生免疫介导毒性和早期死亡的高风险。然而,它们与接受T细胞重定向双特异性抗体(bsAb)治疗患者的预后之间的关系尚不清楚。这项多中心回顾性研究考察了126名接受双特异性抗体治疗的MM患者的基线GPS和CAR-HT评分与预后的关系。总体而言,19% 的患者被确定为 GPS 高风险,但毒性或死亡率并未增加。相反,高风险CAR-HT患者的感染发生率较高,存活率较低,这表明需要采取积极的感染缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune prognostic score predicts the risk of infection and survival outcomes in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies.

The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) score identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients at high risk for immune-mediated toxicity and early mortality with cellular immunotherapy. However, their association with outcomes in patients receiving T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) is unclear. This multi-centre retrospective study examines the association of baseline GPS and CAR-HT scores with outcomes in 126 MM patients treated with bsAb. Overall, 19% were identified as GPS high risk but did not experience increased toxicity or mortality. Conversely, high-risk CAR-HT patients had a higher incidence of infections and inferior survival, suggesting a need for aggressive infection mitigation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信