{"title":"比较电针治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的不同疗程:随机临床试验研究方案","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of plantar heel pain, and previous studies found that acupuncture is effective for relieving pain in patients with PF. Nevertheless, the impact of different sessions of electroacupuncture on PF has not been investigated through randomized, controlled trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods/design</h3><p>This is a two parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, consisting of a four-week treatment phase followed by a 12-week follow-up. Eighty patients with chronic PF will be recruited and randomly allocated to receive 12 (three sessions per week; the multiple electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group M)) or four (one session per week; single electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group S)) sessions of electroacupuncture treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome to be studied is the response rate, defined as a minimum of 50 % improvement in most severe pain intensity with first steps in the morning, compared with baseline. We will perform all analyses based on the intention-to-treat principle, with differences considered significant when the <em>P</em> value < 0.05 on a two-sided basis.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This prospective trial will provide high-quality evidence on evaluating the efficacy and safety of different electroacupuncture sessions (one session per week versus three sessions per week) for chronic PF. This study aims to contribute in produce up-to-date, rigorous evidence on the most effective frequency of electroacupuncture in managing chronic PF.</p><p>Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT06284993. Registered on February 17, 2024.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001029/pdfft?md5=09f202974de9c3e5ec9ed7df509d221d&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424001029-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing different session regimens of electroacupuncture for chronic plantar fasciitis: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of plantar heel pain, and previous studies found that acupuncture is effective for relieving pain in patients with PF. Nevertheless, the impact of different sessions of electroacupuncture on PF has not been investigated through randomized, controlled trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods/design</h3><p>This is a two parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, consisting of a four-week treatment phase followed by a 12-week follow-up. Eighty patients with chronic PF will be recruited and randomly allocated to receive 12 (three sessions per week; the multiple electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group M)) or four (one session per week; single electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group S)) sessions of electroacupuncture treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome to be studied is the response rate, defined as a minimum of 50 % improvement in most severe pain intensity with first steps in the morning, compared with baseline. We will perform all analyses based on the intention-to-treat principle, with differences considered significant when the <em>P</em> value < 0.05 on a two-sided basis.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This prospective trial will provide high-quality evidence on evaluating the efficacy and safety of different electroacupuncture sessions (one session per week versus three sessions per week) for chronic PF. This study aims to contribute in produce up-to-date, rigorous evidence on the most effective frequency of electroacupuncture in managing chronic PF.</p><p>Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT06284993. Registered on February 17, 2024.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001029/pdfft?md5=09f202974de9c3e5ec9ed7df509d221d&pid=1-s2.0-S2451865424001029-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865424001029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing different session regimens of electroacupuncture for chronic plantar fasciitis: Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial
Background
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is one of the most common causes of plantar heel pain, and previous studies found that acupuncture is effective for relieving pain in patients with PF. Nevertheless, the impact of different sessions of electroacupuncture on PF has not been investigated through randomized, controlled trials.
Methods/design
This is a two parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial, consisting of a four-week treatment phase followed by a 12-week follow-up. Eighty patients with chronic PF will be recruited and randomly allocated to receive 12 (three sessions per week; the multiple electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group M)) or four (one session per week; single electroacupuncture weekly treatment group (group S)) sessions of electroacupuncture treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome to be studied is the response rate, defined as a minimum of 50 % improvement in most severe pain intensity with first steps in the morning, compared with baseline. We will perform all analyses based on the intention-to-treat principle, with differences considered significant when the P value < 0.05 on a two-sided basis.
Discussion
This prospective trial will provide high-quality evidence on evaluating the efficacy and safety of different electroacupuncture sessions (one session per week versus three sessions per week) for chronic PF. This study aims to contribute in produce up-to-date, rigorous evidence on the most effective frequency of electroacupuncture in managing chronic PF.
Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT06284993. Registered on February 17, 2024.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.