在设计打入岩基中间岩土材料的桩时明确考虑岩土材料的不确定性

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
{"title":"在设计打入岩基中间岩土材料的桩时明确考虑岩土材料的不确定性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study presents a method for estimating the end bearing of piles driven into rock-based intermediate geomaterials (IGMs). Existing design methods, rooted in soil mechanics, often fall short when applied to IGMs. Moreover, the geomaterial (geological and ground properties) uncertainties are neglected and the piles are designed based on subsurface information from distant boreholes. To address this gap, the study introduces an approach that explicitly considers geomaterial uncertainties by combining empirical models and geostatistical simulation to predict end bearing. Using data from 87 piles driven into various rock-based IGMs with dynamic load testing as the construction control technique, this study introduces the Proposed Design Method (PDM) for the prediction of end bearing. PDM is compared to the Current Design Method (CDM), which is based on traditional soil-mechanics methods. Predictions from these methods are subsequently evaluated against the measured end bearings. The results demonstrate that while the PDM yields comparable predictions to the CDM, it offers a more robust consideration of geomaterial uncertainties. The PDM leads to an approximate 13.60% to 19.35% increase in uncertainties compared to CDM across various IGMs. These findings advance the understanding of pile behavior in the presence of geomaterial uncertainties and inherent variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explicit consideration of geomaterial uncertainties in the load resistance factor design of piles driven into rock-based intermediate geomaterials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study presents a method for estimating the end bearing of piles driven into rock-based intermediate geomaterials (IGMs). Existing design methods, rooted in soil mechanics, often fall short when applied to IGMs. Moreover, the geomaterial (geological and ground properties) uncertainties are neglected and the piles are designed based on subsurface information from distant boreholes. To address this gap, the study introduces an approach that explicitly considers geomaterial uncertainties by combining empirical models and geostatistical simulation to predict end bearing. Using data from 87 piles driven into various rock-based IGMs with dynamic load testing as the construction control technique, this study introduces the Proposed Design Method (PDM) for the prediction of end bearing. PDM is compared to the Current Design Method (CDM), which is based on traditional soil-mechanics methods. Predictions from these methods are subsequently evaluated against the measured end bearings. The results demonstrate that while the PDM yields comparable predictions to the CDM, it offers a more robust consideration of geomaterial uncertainties. The PDM leads to an approximate 13.60% to 19.35% increase in uncertainties compared to CDM across various IGMs. These findings advance the understanding of pile behavior in the presence of geomaterial uncertainties and inherent variability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221439122400179X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221439122400179X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一种估算打入岩基中间土工材料(IGM)的桩端承载力的方法。根植于土壤力学的现有设计方法在应用于 IGM 时往往会出现不足。此外,地质材料(地质和地层属性)的不确定性被忽视,而桩基的设计是基于远距离钻孔获得的地下信息。为弥补这一不足,本研究引入了一种方法,通过将经验模型和地质统计模拟相结合来预测端部承载力,从而明确考虑地质材料的不确定性。本研究利用打入各种岩基 IGM 的 87 根桩的数据,以动态载荷测试作为施工控制技术,提出了用于预测端部承载力的拟议设计方法 (PDM)。PDM 与基于传统土壤力学方法的现行设计方法 (CDM) 进行了比较。随后根据测量的端面支座对这些方法的预测结果进行了评估。结果表明,虽然 PDM 得出的预测结果与 CDM 不相上下,但它对土工材料不确定性的考虑更为稳健。与 CDM 相比,PDM 在各种 IGM 中导致的不确定性增加了约 13.60% 到 19.35%。这些发现加深了人们对地质材料不确定性和固有变异性情况下桩的行为的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explicit consideration of geomaterial uncertainties in the load resistance factor design of piles driven into rock-based intermediate geomaterials

The study presents a method for estimating the end bearing of piles driven into rock-based intermediate geomaterials (IGMs). Existing design methods, rooted in soil mechanics, often fall short when applied to IGMs. Moreover, the geomaterial (geological and ground properties) uncertainties are neglected and the piles are designed based on subsurface information from distant boreholes. To address this gap, the study introduces an approach that explicitly considers geomaterial uncertainties by combining empirical models and geostatistical simulation to predict end bearing. Using data from 87 piles driven into various rock-based IGMs with dynamic load testing as the construction control technique, this study introduces the Proposed Design Method (PDM) for the prediction of end bearing. PDM is compared to the Current Design Method (CDM), which is based on traditional soil-mechanics methods. Predictions from these methods are subsequently evaluated against the measured end bearings. The results demonstrate that while the PDM yields comparable predictions to the CDM, it offers a more robust consideration of geomaterial uncertainties. The PDM leads to an approximate 13.60% to 19.35% increase in uncertainties compared to CDM across various IGMs. These findings advance the understanding of pile behavior in the presence of geomaterial uncertainties and inherent variability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信