在局部麻醉下进行改良经皮跟腱修复术后,功能性支撑与硬性固定及早期负重的前瞻性随机比较

Q2 Health Professions
Foot Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2024.102124
Andrej Čretnik , Roman Košir
{"title":"在局部麻醉下进行改良经皮跟腱修复术后,功能性支撑与硬性固定及早期负重的前瞻性随机比较","authors":"Andrej Čretnik ,&nbsp;Roman Košir","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The optimal treatment and rehabilitation strategy for acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) remain a debate. This study aimed to compare the results of the two postoperative regimens after treatment for ATR with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a 4-year study, 72 consecutive patients with acute complete ATR were randomized after percutaneous repair into a functional group (FG), using a modified brace (28 males, three females; mean age 41.9 [29–71] years) and an immobilization group (IG), wearing a rigid plaster (28 males, two females; mean age 42.2 [29–57] years), for a period of 6 weeks. Except for immobilization, they followed the same weight-bearing and rehabilitation protocols. The follow-up period was 3 years. The complication rate, active and passive ankle range of motion, standing heel-rise test, clinical outcome using the American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, return to the previous activity level, and subjective assessment were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was one rerupture in the IG and two transient sural nerve disturbances in the FG and one in the IG, and one suture extrusion in the IG, with no other complications. The average AOFAS scores were 96.9 ± 4.3 and 96.0 ± 4.9 in the FG and IG, respectively. Patients in the FG reached a final range of motion and muscular strength sooner without limping and were more satisfied with the treatment. No significant differences could be detected between groups according to the results in any of the assessed parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early dynamic functional bracing in patients with ATR treated with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia resulted in earlier functional recovery with similar final results in terms of complications and functional outcomes, such as rigid postoperative immobilization with standardized rehabilitation and weight-bearing protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>I, Prospective randomized study</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000579/pdfft?md5=9613d9cffd81da22bac16bf40db1ed7b&pid=1-s2.0-S0958259224000579-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective randomized comparison of functional bracing versus rigid immobilization with early weightbearing after modified percutaneous achilles tendon repair under local anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Andrej Čretnik ,&nbsp;Roman Košir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The optimal treatment and rehabilitation strategy for acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) remain a debate. This study aimed to compare the results of the two postoperative regimens after treatment for ATR with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a 4-year study, 72 consecutive patients with acute complete ATR were randomized after percutaneous repair into a functional group (FG), using a modified brace (28 males, three females; mean age 41.9 [29–71] years) and an immobilization group (IG), wearing a rigid plaster (28 males, two females; mean age 42.2 [29–57] years), for a period of 6 weeks. Except for immobilization, they followed the same weight-bearing and rehabilitation protocols. The follow-up period was 3 years. The complication rate, active and passive ankle range of motion, standing heel-rise test, clinical outcome using the American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, return to the previous activity level, and subjective assessment were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was one rerupture in the IG and two transient sural nerve disturbances in the FG and one in the IG, and one suture extrusion in the IG, with no other complications. The average AOFAS scores were 96.9 ± 4.3 and 96.0 ± 4.9 in the FG and IG, respectively. Patients in the FG reached a final range of motion and muscular strength sooner without limping and were more satisfied with the treatment. No significant differences could be detected between groups according to the results in any of the assessed parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early dynamic functional bracing in patients with ATR treated with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia resulted in earlier functional recovery with similar final results in terms of complications and functional outcomes, such as rigid postoperative immobilization with standardized rehabilitation and weight-bearing protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>I, Prospective randomized study</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000579/pdfft?md5=9613d9cffd81da22bac16bf40db1ed7b&pid=1-s2.0-S0958259224000579-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的急性跟腱断裂(ATR)的最佳治疗和康复策略仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较在局部麻醉下采用改良闭合经皮修复术治疗 ATR 后两种术后方案的效果。方法在一项为期 4 年的研究中,72 名急性完全性 ATR 患者在经皮修复术后被随机分为功能组(FG)和固定组(IG),前者使用改良支架(28 名男性,3 名女性;平均年龄 41.9 [29-71] 岁),后者佩戴硬石膏(28 名男性,2 名女性;平均年龄 42.2 [29-57] 岁),为期 6 周。除固定外,他们遵循相同的负重和康复方案。随访期为 3 年。对并发症发生率、踝关节主动和被动活动范围、站立提踵试验、使用美国足踝协会(AOFAS)后足踝评分的临床结果、恢复到以前的活动水平以及主观评价进行了评估。结果 IG发生1次再断裂,FG和IG分别发生2次和1次一过性鞘神经紊乱,IG发生1次缝线挤出,无其他并发症。FG 和 IG 的 AOFAS 平均得分分别为 96.9 ± 4.3 和 96.0 ± 4.9。FG患者更快达到最终活动范围和肌肉力量,且无跛行,对治疗更满意。结论对在局部麻醉下接受改良闭合经皮修补术治疗的 ATR 患者进行早期动态功能支具治疗,可使患者更早地恢复功能,并在并发症和功能结果方面取得相似的最终结果,如术后严格固定、标准化康复和负重方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective randomized comparison of functional bracing versus rigid immobilization with early weightbearing after modified percutaneous achilles tendon repair under local anesthesia

Objective

The optimal treatment and rehabilitation strategy for acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) remain a debate. This study aimed to compare the results of the two postoperative regimens after treatment for ATR with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia.

Methods

In a 4-year study, 72 consecutive patients with acute complete ATR were randomized after percutaneous repair into a functional group (FG), using a modified brace (28 males, three females; mean age 41.9 [29–71] years) and an immobilization group (IG), wearing a rigid plaster (28 males, two females; mean age 42.2 [29–57] years), for a period of 6 weeks. Except for immobilization, they followed the same weight-bearing and rehabilitation protocols. The follow-up period was 3 years. The complication rate, active and passive ankle range of motion, standing heel-rise test, clinical outcome using the American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, return to the previous activity level, and subjective assessment were assessed.

Results

There was one rerupture in the IG and two transient sural nerve disturbances in the FG and one in the IG, and one suture extrusion in the IG, with no other complications. The average AOFAS scores were 96.9 ± 4.3 and 96.0 ± 4.9 in the FG and IG, respectively. Patients in the FG reached a final range of motion and muscular strength sooner without limping and were more satisfied with the treatment. No significant differences could be detected between groups according to the results in any of the assessed parameters.

Conclusion

Early dynamic functional bracing in patients with ATR treated with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia resulted in earlier functional recovery with similar final results in terms of complications and functional outcomes, such as rigid postoperative immobilization with standardized rehabilitation and weight-bearing protocol.

Level of evidence

I, Prospective randomized study

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信