骨软骨异体移植物扩孔会显著影响软骨细胞的活力。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1177/03635465241268969
Tristan J Elias, Sachin Allahabadi, Erik Haneberg, Vince Morgan, Alexandra Walker, Corey Beals, Brian J Cole, Adam B Yanke
{"title":"骨软骨异体移植物扩孔会显著影响软骨细胞的活力。","authors":"Tristan J Elias, Sachin Allahabadi, Erik Haneberg, Vince Morgan, Alexandra Walker, Corey Beals, Brian J Cole, Adam B Yanke","doi":"10.1177/03635465241268969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chondrocyte viability is associated with the clinical success of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of distal femoral OCA plug harvest and recipient site preparation on regional cell viability using traditional handheld saline irrigation versus saline submersion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each of 13 femoral hemicondyles, 4 cartilage samples were harvested: (1) 5-mm control cartilage, (2) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested with a powered coring reamer and concurrent handheld saline irrigation (\"traditional\"), (3) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested while submerged under normal saline (\"submerged\"), and (4) 5-mm cartilage from the peripheral rim of a recipient socket created with a 15-mm cannulated counterbore reamer to a total depth of 7 mm with concurrent handheld saline irrigation (\"recipient\"). The 15 mm-diameter plugs were divided into the central 5 mm and the peripheral 5 mm (2 edges) for comparisons. Samples were stained using calcein and ethidium, and live/dead cell percentages were calculated and compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the submerged group, the traditional group had significantly lower percentages of live cells across the whole plug (71.54% ± 4.82% vs 61.42% ± 4.98%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .003), at the center of the plug (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 62.30% ± 6.11%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .005), and at the periphery of the plug (70.93% ± 4.51% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .003). The traditional group had significantly fewer live cells in all plug regions compared with the control group (77.51% ± 9.23%; <i>P <</i> .0001). There were no significant differences in cell viability between the control and submerged groups (whole: <i>P</i> = .590; center: <i>P</i> = .713; periphery: <i>P</i> = .799). There were no differences between the central and peripheral 5-mm plug regions for the traditional (62.30% ± 6.11% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .108) and submerged (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 70.93% ± 4.51%, respectively; <i>P =</i> .061) groups. The recipient group (61.10% ± 5.02%) had significantly lower cell viability compared with the control group (<i>P</i> < .0001) and the periphery of the submerged group (<i>P</i> = .009) but was equivalent to the periphery of the traditional group (<i>P</i> = .990).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a significant amount of chondrocyte death induced by OCA donor plug harvesting using a powered coring reamer with traditional handheld saline irrigation, which was mitigated by harvesting the plug while the allograft was submerged under saline.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Mitigating this thermally induced damage by harvesting the OCA plug while the allograft was submerged in saline maintained chondrocyte viability throughout the plug and may help to improve the integration and survival of OCAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteochondral Allograft Reaming Significantly Affects Chondrocyte Viability.\",\"authors\":\"Tristan J Elias, Sachin Allahabadi, Erik Haneberg, Vince Morgan, Alexandra Walker, Corey Beals, Brian J Cole, Adam B Yanke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241268969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chondrocyte viability is associated with the clinical success of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of distal femoral OCA plug harvest and recipient site preparation on regional cell viability using traditional handheld saline irrigation versus saline submersion.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For each of 13 femoral hemicondyles, 4 cartilage samples were harvested: (1) 5-mm control cartilage, (2) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested with a powered coring reamer and concurrent handheld saline irrigation (\\\"traditional\\\"), (3) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested while submerged under normal saline (\\\"submerged\\\"), and (4) 5-mm cartilage from the peripheral rim of a recipient socket created with a 15-mm cannulated counterbore reamer to a total depth of 7 mm with concurrent handheld saline irrigation (\\\"recipient\\\"). The 15 mm-diameter plugs were divided into the central 5 mm and the peripheral 5 mm (2 edges) for comparisons. Samples were stained using calcein and ethidium, and live/dead cell percentages were calculated and compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the submerged group, the traditional group had significantly lower percentages of live cells across the whole plug (71.54% ± 4.82% vs 61.42% ± 4.98%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .003), at the center of the plug (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 62.30% ± 6.11%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .005), and at the periphery of the plug (70.93% ± 4.51% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .003). The traditional group had significantly fewer live cells in all plug regions compared with the control group (77.51% ± 9.23%; <i>P <</i> .0001). There were no significant differences in cell viability between the control and submerged groups (whole: <i>P</i> = .590; center: <i>P</i> = .713; periphery: <i>P</i> = .799). There were no differences between the central and peripheral 5-mm plug regions for the traditional (62.30% ± 6.11% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .108) and submerged (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 70.93% ± 4.51%, respectively; <i>P =</i> .061) groups. The recipient group (61.10% ± 5.02%) had significantly lower cell viability compared with the control group (<i>P</i> < .0001) and the periphery of the submerged group (<i>P</i> = .009) but was equivalent to the periphery of the traditional group (<i>P</i> = .990).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a significant amount of chondrocyte death induced by OCA donor plug harvesting using a powered coring reamer with traditional handheld saline irrigation, which was mitigated by harvesting the plug while the allograft was submerged under saline.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Mitigating this thermally induced damage by harvesting the OCA plug while the allograft was submerged in saline maintained chondrocyte viability throughout the plug and may help to improve the integration and survival of OCAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241268969\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241268969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:软骨细胞活力与骨软骨异体移植(OCA)的临床成功率有关:目的:使用传统的手持生理盐水冲洗法与生理盐水浸泡法,研究股骨远端OCA移植栓采集和受体部位准备对区域细胞活力的影响:研究设计:对照实验室研究:在 13 个股骨半髁上各采集 4 个软骨样本:(1)5毫米对照软骨;(2)用动力取芯铰刀和手持生理盐水灌注法采集的15毫米OCA供体软骨栓("传统");(3)在生理盐水浸泡下采集的15毫米OCA供体软骨栓("浸泡");(4)用15毫米插管反孔铰刀从受体臼周边边缘采集的5毫米软骨,总深度为7毫米,同时进行手持生理盐水灌注("受体")。直径为 15 毫米的塞子分为中央 5 毫米和外围 5 毫米(2 个边缘)进行比较。样本用钙黄绿素和乙二胺染色,计算活细胞/死亡细胞的百分比,并在各组间进行比较:结果:与浸没组相比,传统组在整个塞子(分别为 71.54% ± 4.82% vs 61.42% ± 4.98%;P = .003)、塞子中心(分别为 72.76% ± 5.87% vs 62.30% ± 6.11%;P = .005)和塞子外围(分别为 70.93% ± 4.51% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%;P = .003)的活细胞百分比明显较低。与对照组(77.51% ± 9.23%;P .0001)相比,传统组在所有塞子区域的活细胞数量明显较少。对照组和浸没组的细胞存活率无明显差异(整体:P = .590;中心:P = .713;外围:P = .799)。传统组(分别为 62.30% ± 6.11% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%;P = .108)和浸没组(分别为 72.76% ± 5.87% vs 70.93% ± 4.51%;P = .061)中央和外围 5 毫米塞区之间没有差异。受体组(61.10% ± 5.02%)的细胞存活率明显低于对照组(P < .0001)和浸没组外围(P = .009),但与传统组外围(P = .990)相当:结论:使用动力取芯铰刀和传统的手持生理盐水灌注法摘取OCA供体栓塞会诱发大量软骨细胞死亡,而在生理盐水下浸泡异体移植物时摘取栓塞可减轻这种情况:临床意义:在同种异体移植物浸没在生理盐水中的情况下采集 OCA 插头,减轻了热引起的损伤,保持了整个插头的软骨细胞活力,可能有助于提高 OCA 的整合和存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteochondral Allograft Reaming Significantly Affects Chondrocyte Viability.

Background: Chondrocyte viability is associated with the clinical success of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.

Purpose: To investigate the effect of distal femoral OCA plug harvest and recipient site preparation on regional cell viability using traditional handheld saline irrigation versus saline submersion.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: For each of 13 femoral hemicondyles, 4 cartilage samples were harvested: (1) 5-mm control cartilage, (2) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested with a powered coring reamer and concurrent handheld saline irrigation ("traditional"), (3) 15-mm OCA donor plug harvested while submerged under normal saline ("submerged"), and (4) 5-mm cartilage from the peripheral rim of a recipient socket created with a 15-mm cannulated counterbore reamer to a total depth of 7 mm with concurrent handheld saline irrigation ("recipient"). The 15 mm-diameter plugs were divided into the central 5 mm and the peripheral 5 mm (2 edges) for comparisons. Samples were stained using calcein and ethidium, and live/dead cell percentages were calculated and compared across groups.

Results: Compared with the submerged group, the traditional group had significantly lower percentages of live cells across the whole plug (71.54% ± 4.82% vs 61.42% ± 4.98%, respectively; P = .003), at the center of the plug (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 62.30% ± 6.11%, respectively; P = .005), and at the periphery of the plug (70.93% ± 4.51% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; P = .003). The traditional group had significantly fewer live cells in all plug regions compared with the control group (77.51% ± 9.23%; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in cell viability between the control and submerged groups (whole: P = .590; center: P = .713; periphery: P = .799). There were no differences between the central and peripheral 5-mm plug regions for the traditional (62.30% ± 6.11% vs 60.91% ± 4.75%, respectively; P = .108) and submerged (72.76% ± 5.87% vs 70.93% ± 4.51%, respectively; P = .061) groups. The recipient group (61.10% ± 5.02%) had significantly lower cell viability compared with the control group (P < .0001) and the periphery of the submerged group (P = .009) but was equivalent to the periphery of the traditional group (P = .990).

Conclusion: There was a significant amount of chondrocyte death induced by OCA donor plug harvesting using a powered coring reamer with traditional handheld saline irrigation, which was mitigated by harvesting the plug while the allograft was submerged under saline.

Clinical relevance: Mitigating this thermally induced damage by harvesting the OCA plug while the allograft was submerged in saline maintained chondrocyte viability throughout the plug and may help to improve the integration and survival of OCAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信