Bettina Højberg Kirk, Marianne Wetendorff Nørgaard, Pernille Palm, Tone Merete Norekvål, Ole De Backer
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术后早期活动的安全性和患者体验:随机试验。","authors":"Bettina Højberg Kirk, Marianne Wetendorff Nørgaard, Pernille Palm, Tone Merete Norekvål, Ole De Backer","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immobilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for preventing access-related complications. However, the length of bed rest varies, and possible complications and patient experience remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this pilot study, our aim was to investigate safety and efficacy after bed rest after TAVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized trial included 298 patients. Patients were randomized to standard 6 hours (n = 149) or 3 hours (n = 149) of bed rest after TAVR. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of access-related bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥ 2), hematoma (>5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, and vascular complications requiring intervention. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient-reported back pain, rated ≥6 on a numeric rating scale 24 hours post procedure. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary safety endpoint, patient-reported pain, urination problems, and comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary safety endpoint occurred in 14 (9.4%) and 12 (8.1%) patients in the 6-hour and 3-hour immobilization groups, respectively (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.79]; P = .68). There were no significant differences in individual bleeding or vascular complication endpoints. Patients with 3 hours of bed rest reported less back pain (P < .001), fewer urination problems (P < .001), and better comfort (P < .001) than patients with 6 hours of bed rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mobilization as early as 3 hours after TAVR was shown to be safe, not resulting in a higher rate of bleeding or vascular complications as compared with 6 hours of bed rest. However, there was a difference in patient-reported back pain, urination problems, and comfort, favoring early mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Patient Experience With Early Mobilization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Højberg Kirk, Marianne Wetendorff Nørgaard, Pernille Palm, Tone Merete Norekvål, Ole De Backer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immobilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for preventing access-related complications. However, the length of bed rest varies, and possible complications and patient experience remain unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this pilot study, our aim was to investigate safety and efficacy after bed rest after TAVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center randomized trial included 298 patients. Patients were randomized to standard 6 hours (n = 149) or 3 hours (n = 149) of bed rest after TAVR. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of access-related bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥ 2), hematoma (>5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, and vascular complications requiring intervention. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient-reported back pain, rated ≥6 on a numeric rating scale 24 hours post procedure. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary safety endpoint, patient-reported pain, urination problems, and comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary safety endpoint occurred in 14 (9.4%) and 12 (8.1%) patients in the 6-hour and 3-hour immobilization groups, respectively (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.79]; P = .68). There were no significant differences in individual bleeding or vascular complication endpoints. Patients with 3 hours of bed rest reported less back pain (P < .001), fewer urination problems (P < .001), and better comfort (P < .001) than patients with 6 hours of bed rest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mobilization as early as 3 hours after TAVR was shown to be safe, not resulting in a higher rate of bleeding or vascular complications as compared with 6 hours of bed rest. However, there was a difference in patient-reported back pain, urination problems, and comfort, favoring early mobilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety and Patient Experience With Early Mobilization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Trial.
Background: Immobilization after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the standard treatment for preventing access-related complications. However, the length of bed rest varies, and possible complications and patient experience remain unexplored.
Objective: In this pilot study, our aim was to investigate safety and efficacy after bed rest after TAVR.
Methods: This single-center randomized trial included 298 patients. Patients were randomized to standard 6 hours (n = 149) or 3 hours (n = 149) of bed rest after TAVR. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of access-related bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥ 2), hematoma (>5 cm), pseudoaneurysm, and vascular complications requiring intervention. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient-reported back pain, rated ≥6 on a numeric rating scale 24 hours post procedure. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary safety endpoint, patient-reported pain, urination problems, and comfort.
Results: The primary safety endpoint occurred in 14 (9.4%) and 12 (8.1%) patients in the 6-hour and 3-hour immobilization groups, respectively (risk ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.79]; P = .68). There were no significant differences in individual bleeding or vascular complication endpoints. Patients with 3 hours of bed rest reported less back pain (P < .001), fewer urination problems (P < .001), and better comfort (P < .001) than patients with 6 hours of bed rest.
Conclusions: Mobilization as early as 3 hours after TAVR was shown to be safe, not resulting in a higher rate of bleeding or vascular complications as compared with 6 hours of bed rest. However, there was a difference in patient-reported back pain, urination problems, and comfort, favoring early mobilization.
期刊介绍:
Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.