推动在物理治疗研究、实践和教育中有意识地实施可持续性概念及其替代方案。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Filip Maric, Mila Plaisant, Robert Richter
{"title":"推动在物理治疗研究、实践和教育中有意识地实施可持续性概念及其替代方案。","authors":"Filip Maric, Mila Plaisant, Robert Richter","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2395486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustainability has become a ubiquitous imperative across all sectors of society, including healthcare. Building on the broader discourse on sustainable development, sustainability is used in relation to social, ecological, and economic concerns with varying degrees of emphasis and often related to a sense of durability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a detailed analysis of the concept of sustainability in current physical therapy literature and advance its deliberate future implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Setting out from a critical exposition of prevalent models of sustainability, we conducted a critical discourse analysis to (1) examine the implementation of the concept of sustainability in physical therapy academic literature and (2) critically evaluate its hitherto use in light of the broader discourse surrounding sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified a focus on the cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions, and the use of so-called \"weak\" and \"strong sustainability\" models in the physical therapy literature. Other models and the broader critical discourse surrounding sustainability are only gradually finding their way into physical therapy literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical therapy lacks comprehensive exploration of both general and profession-specific understandings of sustainability. Nuanced engagement with sustainability and its alternatives is necessary to ensure its meaningful implementation in physical therapy research, education, and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the deliberate implementation of the concept of sustainability and its alternatives in physical therapy research, practice, and education.\",\"authors\":\"Filip Maric, Mila Plaisant, Robert Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2395486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustainability has become a ubiquitous imperative across all sectors of society, including healthcare. Building on the broader discourse on sustainable development, sustainability is used in relation to social, ecological, and economic concerns with varying degrees of emphasis and often related to a sense of durability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a detailed analysis of the concept of sustainability in current physical therapy literature and advance its deliberate future implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Setting out from a critical exposition of prevalent models of sustainability, we conducted a critical discourse analysis to (1) examine the implementation of the concept of sustainability in physical therapy academic literature and (2) critically evaluate its hitherto use in light of the broader discourse surrounding sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified a focus on the cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions, and the use of so-called \\\"weak\\\" and \\\"strong sustainability\\\" models in the physical therapy literature. Other models and the broader critical discourse surrounding sustainability are only gradually finding their way into physical therapy literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical therapy lacks comprehensive exploration of both general and profession-specific understandings of sustainability. Nuanced engagement with sustainability and its alternatives is necessary to ensure its meaningful implementation in physical therapy research, education, and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2395486\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2395486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:可持续发展已成为包括医疗保健在内的所有社会部门的当务之急。在有关可持续发展的广泛讨论基础上,可持续发展被用于社会、生态和经济方面的问题,强调程度各不相同,通常与持久性有关:详细分析当前物理治疗文献中的可持续发展概念,并推动其在未来的实施:方法:我们从批判性地阐述可持续发展的普遍模式入手,进行了批判性话语分析,以(1)检查可持续发展概念在物理治疗学术文献中的实施情况;(2)根据围绕可持续发展的更广泛的话语,批判性地评估其迄今为止的使用情况:我们的分析发现,在物理治疗文献中,人们关注医疗保健干预措施的成本效益,并使用所谓的 "弱可持续性 "和 "强可持续性 "模式。其他模式和围绕可持续性的更广泛的批判性讨论只是逐渐进入物理治疗文献:结论:物理治疗缺乏对可持续性的一般理解和特定专业理解的全面探讨。要确保在物理治疗研究、教育和实践中有效实施可持续发展,就必须对可持续发展及其替代方案进行细致入微的探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing the deliberate implementation of the concept of sustainability and its alternatives in physical therapy research, practice, and education.

Background: Sustainability has become a ubiquitous imperative across all sectors of society, including healthcare. Building on the broader discourse on sustainable development, sustainability is used in relation to social, ecological, and economic concerns with varying degrees of emphasis and often related to a sense of durability.

Objective: To provide a detailed analysis of the concept of sustainability in current physical therapy literature and advance its deliberate future implementation.

Methods: Setting out from a critical exposition of prevalent models of sustainability, we conducted a critical discourse analysis to (1) examine the implementation of the concept of sustainability in physical therapy academic literature and (2) critically evaluate its hitherto use in light of the broader discourse surrounding sustainability.

Results: Our analysis identified a focus on the cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions, and the use of so-called "weak" and "strong sustainability" models in the physical therapy literature. Other models and the broader critical discourse surrounding sustainability are only gradually finding their way into physical therapy literature.

Conclusion: Physical therapy lacks comprehensive exploration of both general and profession-specific understandings of sustainability. Nuanced engagement with sustainability and its alternatives is necessary to ensure its meaningful implementation in physical therapy research, education, and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信