院外心脏骤停患者使用除颤器的性别差异。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kathryn Thompson, Jeffrey Smith, Mary Tanski, Matthew R Neth, Ritu Sahni, Jamie Kennel, Jonathan Jui, Craig D Newgard, Mohamud R Daya, Joshua R Lupton
{"title":"院外心脏骤停患者使用除颤器的性别差异。","authors":"Kathryn Thompson, Jeffrey Smith, Mary Tanski, Matthew R Neth, Ritu Sahni, Jamie Kennel, Jonathan Jui, Craig D Newgard, Mohamud R Daya, Joshua R Lupton","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2394590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disparities remain in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) for women compared to men. Our objective was to evaluate differences in automated external defibrillator (AED) use before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival and time from arrival to initial EMS defibrillation by EMS-assessed gender (women or men).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of adult non-traumatic, EMS-treated OHCA cases in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry from 2018 to 2021. Emergency Medical Services-witnessed cardiac arrests were excluded and the primary outcomes were pre-EMS AED application and the time from EMS arrival to first defibrillation among patients in a shockable rhythm at first rhythm assessment without pre-EMS AED application. We examined pre-EMS AED application rates overall and separately for law enforcement, in cases where they were on-scene before EMS without a lay bystander AED applied, and lay responders, in cases where law enforcement had not applied an AED. We used multivariable logistic and linear regressions to adjust for potential confounders, including age, arrest location, witness status, bystander CPR, year, and time from dispatch to EMS arrival. We accounted for clustering by county of arrest using a mixed-effects approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,135 adult, EMS-treated non-traumatic OHCAs that were not witnessed by EMS, 3,049 had all variables for analysis, of which 1,011 (33.2%) were women. The adjusted odds (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]) for any pre-EMS placement of an AED was significantly higher for men compared to women (1.40 [1.05-1.86]). These odds favoring men remained when examining law enforcement AED application (1.89 [1.16-3.07]), but not lay bystander AED application (1.19 [0.83-1.71]). Among patients still in arrest on EMS arrival, with a shockable initial EMS rhythm, and without pre-EMS AED application, the time from EMS arrival on-scene to initial defibrillation was significantly longer for women compared to men (+0.81 min [0.22-1.41 min]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with OHCA received lower rates of pre-EMS AED application and delays in initial EMS defibrillation compared to men.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Defibrillator Practices in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Thompson, Jeffrey Smith, Mary Tanski, Matthew R Neth, Ritu Sahni, Jamie Kennel, Jonathan Jui, Craig D Newgard, Mohamud R Daya, Joshua R Lupton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2394590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disparities remain in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) for women compared to men. Our objective was to evaluate differences in automated external defibrillator (AED) use before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival and time from arrival to initial EMS defibrillation by EMS-assessed gender (women or men).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of adult non-traumatic, EMS-treated OHCA cases in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry from 2018 to 2021. Emergency Medical Services-witnessed cardiac arrests were excluded and the primary outcomes were pre-EMS AED application and the time from EMS arrival to first defibrillation among patients in a shockable rhythm at first rhythm assessment without pre-EMS AED application. We examined pre-EMS AED application rates overall and separately for law enforcement, in cases where they were on-scene before EMS without a lay bystander AED applied, and lay responders, in cases where law enforcement had not applied an AED. We used multivariable logistic and linear regressions to adjust for potential confounders, including age, arrest location, witness status, bystander CPR, year, and time from dispatch to EMS arrival. We accounted for clustering by county of arrest using a mixed-effects approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3,135 adult, EMS-treated non-traumatic OHCAs that were not witnessed by EMS, 3,049 had all variables for analysis, of which 1,011 (33.2%) were women. The adjusted odds (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]) for any pre-EMS placement of an AED was significantly higher for men compared to women (1.40 [1.05-1.86]). These odds favoring men remained when examining law enforcement AED application (1.89 [1.16-3.07]), but not lay bystander AED application (1.19 [0.83-1.71]). Among patients still in arrest on EMS arrival, with a shockable initial EMS rhythm, and without pre-EMS AED application, the time from EMS arrival on-scene to initial defibrillation was significantly longer for women compared to men (+0.81 min [0.22-1.41 min]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with OHCA received lower rates of pre-EMS AED application and delays in initial EMS defibrillation compared to men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2394590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2394590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:与男性相比,女性在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的存活率仍存在差异。我们的目的是评估在急救医疗服务(EMS)到达前使用自动体外除颤器(AED)的差异,以及从到达到 EMS 首次除颤的时间,按 EMS 评估的性别(女性或男性)进行区分:这是对波特兰心脏骤停流行病学登记处 2018 年至 2021 年期间经急救服务处理的非创伤性成人 OHCA 病例进行的二次分析。不包括急救医疗服务目击的心脏骤停,主要结果是急救医疗服务前自动体外除颤器(AED)的应用,以及急救医疗服务到达后,在未应用急救医疗服务前自动体外除颤器(AED)的情况下,首次心律评估时处于可电击心律的患者从急救医疗服务到达到首次除颤的时间。我们检查了急救系统前自动体外除颤器的总体应用率,并分别检查了执法人员和非专业急救人员的应用率,前者是指在急救人员到达现场之前,执法人员未应用旁观者自动体外除颤器的情况,后者是指执法人员未应用自动体外除颤器的情况。我们使用多变量逻辑回归和线性回归对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整,这些因素包括年龄、停电地点、目击者身份、旁观者心肺复苏术、年份以及从调度到急救中心到达的时间。我们采用混合效应法考虑到了因县而异的情况:在 3,135 例未经急救人员目击的成人非创伤性 OHCAs 中,有 3,049 例具备分析所需的所有变量,其中 1,011 例(33.2%)为女性。与女性相比,男性在急救前放置自动体外除颤器的调整赔率(调整赔率比 [95%CI])明显更高(1.40 [1.05-1.86])。在检查执法人员使用自动体外除颤器的情况(1.89 [1.16-3.07]),以及非专业旁观者使用自动体外除颤器的情况(1.19 [0.83-1.71])时,男性使用自动体外除颤器的几率仍然较高。在急救人员到达现场时仍处于停搏状态、急救人员初始心律可电击且未使用急救前自动体外除颤器的患者中,女性从急救人员到达现场到初始除颤的时间明显长于男性(+0.81 分钟 [0.22-1.41 分钟]):结论:与男性相比,患有 OHCA 的女性在急救前使用自动体外除颤器的比例较低,且急救中心初始除颤的延迟时间较长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Differences in Defibrillator Practices in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Objectives: Disparities remain in survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) for women compared to men. Our objective was to evaluate differences in automated external defibrillator (AED) use before Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival and time from arrival to initial EMS defibrillation by EMS-assessed gender (women or men).

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of adult non-traumatic, EMS-treated OHCA cases in the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry from 2018 to 2021. Emergency Medical Services-witnessed cardiac arrests were excluded and the primary outcomes were pre-EMS AED application and the time from EMS arrival to first defibrillation among patients in a shockable rhythm at first rhythm assessment without pre-EMS AED application. We examined pre-EMS AED application rates overall and separately for law enforcement, in cases where they were on-scene before EMS without a lay bystander AED applied, and lay responders, in cases where law enforcement had not applied an AED. We used multivariable logistic and linear regressions to adjust for potential confounders, including age, arrest location, witness status, bystander CPR, year, and time from dispatch to EMS arrival. We accounted for clustering by county of arrest using a mixed-effects approach.

Results: Of the 3,135 adult, EMS-treated non-traumatic OHCAs that were not witnessed by EMS, 3,049 had all variables for analysis, of which 1,011 (33.2%) were women. The adjusted odds (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]) for any pre-EMS placement of an AED was significantly higher for men compared to women (1.40 [1.05-1.86]). These odds favoring men remained when examining law enforcement AED application (1.89 [1.16-3.07]), but not lay bystander AED application (1.19 [0.83-1.71]). Among patients still in arrest on EMS arrival, with a shockable initial EMS rhythm, and without pre-EMS AED application, the time from EMS arrival on-scene to initial defibrillation was significantly longer for women compared to men (+0.81 min [0.22-1.41 min]).

Conclusions: Women with OHCA received lower rates of pre-EMS AED application and delays in initial EMS defibrillation compared to men.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信