神经认知需求减少了前十字韧带重建后运动员受伤腿的跳跃距离和协调变异性。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Alli Gokeler, Marit A Zandbergen, Roy A G Hoogeslag, Albert van Houten Van, Eline M Nijmeijer, Pieter Heuvelmans
{"title":"神经认知需求减少了前十字韧带重建后运动员受伤腿的跳跃距离和协调变异性。","authors":"Alli Gokeler, Marit A Zandbergen, Roy A G Hoogeslag, Albert van Houten Van, Eline M Nijmeijer, Pieter Heuvelmans","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurocognitive reliance on jump distance and lower extremity kinematics in individuals who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This was achieved by comparing hop performance under standard and neurocognitive conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients after ACLR and 32 healthy controls (CTRL) participated. Both groups performed a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and two neurocognitive hop tests, each designed to evaluate distinct aspects of neurocognition. The neurocognitive tests included the reaction SLHD (R-SLHD), measuring reaction to a central stimulus and working memory SLHD (WM-SLHD) assessing response to a memorized stimulus amidst distractor stimuli. Distances were assessed for the three-hop tests. In addition, joint kinematics were collected to calculate lower extremity coordination of the lower extremity. SLHD performance was defined as the mean hop distance per condition per leg for each participant and was analyzed using a mixed ANOVA with condition and leg as the within-subjects factors and the group (ACLR or CTRL) as the between-subjects factor. Differences in joint coordination variability were analyzed using two-sample t-test statistical parametric mapping (SPM) with linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WM-SLHD resulted in a significantly decreased jump distance compared with the standard hop test both for ACLR and CTRL. Furthermore, the leg difference within the ACLR group increased under higher cognitive load as tested with the WM-SLHD, indicating leg-specific adaptations in lower extremity coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurocognitive single-leg hop tests resulted in reduced jump distance in CTRL and ACLR. The neurocognitive hop test revealed changes in coordination variability for the CTRL and the uninjured leg of ACLR individuals, whereas the injured leg's coordination variability remained unaltered, suggesting persistent cognitive control of movements post-ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocognitive demands reduce jump distance and coordination variability of the injured leg in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Alli Gokeler, Marit A Zandbergen, Roy A G Hoogeslag, Albert van Houten Van, Eline M Nijmeijer, Pieter Heuvelmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.12439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurocognitive reliance on jump distance and lower extremity kinematics in individuals who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This was achieved by comparing hop performance under standard and neurocognitive conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two patients after ACLR and 32 healthy controls (CTRL) participated. Both groups performed a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and two neurocognitive hop tests, each designed to evaluate distinct aspects of neurocognition. The neurocognitive tests included the reaction SLHD (R-SLHD), measuring reaction to a central stimulus and working memory SLHD (WM-SLHD) assessing response to a memorized stimulus amidst distractor stimuli. Distances were assessed for the three-hop tests. In addition, joint kinematics were collected to calculate lower extremity coordination of the lower extremity. SLHD performance was defined as the mean hop distance per condition per leg for each participant and was analyzed using a mixed ANOVA with condition and leg as the within-subjects factors and the group (ACLR or CTRL) as the between-subjects factor. Differences in joint coordination variability were analyzed using two-sample t-test statistical parametric mapping (SPM) with linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The WM-SLHD resulted in a significantly decreased jump distance compared with the standard hop test both for ACLR and CTRL. Furthermore, the leg difference within the ACLR group increased under higher cognitive load as tested with the WM-SLHD, indicating leg-specific adaptations in lower extremity coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neurocognitive single-leg hop tests resulted in reduced jump distance in CTRL and ACLR. The neurocognitive hop test revealed changes in coordination variability for the CTRL and the uninjured leg of ACLR individuals, whereas the injured leg's coordination variability remained unaltered, suggesting persistent cognitive control of movements post-ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估神经认知依赖对接受过前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的人的跳跃距离和下肢运动学的影响。方法是比较标准条件和神经认知条件下的跳跃表现:32名前交叉韧带重建术后患者和32名健康对照组(CTRL)参加了此次研究。两组患者都进行了单腿跳远(SLHD)和两项神经认知跳远测试,每项测试都旨在评估神经认知的不同方面。神经认知测试包括反应跳远(R-SLHD)和工作记忆跳远(WM-SLHD),前者测量对中心刺激的反应,后者评估在干扰刺激中对记忆刺激的反应。对三跳测试的距离进行了评估。此外,还收集了关节运动学数据,以计算下肢的协调性。SLHD成绩定义为每位受试者每条腿在每种条件下的平均跳跃距离,并使用混合方差分析法进行分析,条件和腿为受试者内因子,组别(ACLR或CTRL)为受试者间因子。关节协调变异性的差异采用双样本 t 检验统计参数映射(SPM)和线性回归进行分析:结果:与标准跳跃测试相比,ACLR 和 CTRL 的 WM-SLHD 导致跳跃距离明显减少。此外,在使用 WM-SLHD 进行测试时,在认知负荷较高的情况下,ACLR 组的腿部差异会增加,这表明腿部在下肢协调方面有特定的适应性:结论:神经认知单腿跳跃测试导致 CTRL 和 ACLR 的跳跃距离缩短。神经认知跳跃测试显示,CTRL 和 ACLR 患者未受伤腿的协调变异性发生了变化,而受伤腿的协调变异性保持不变,这表明 ACLR 后患者对运动的认知控制仍在持续:证据等级:III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurocognitive demands reduce jump distance and coordination variability of the injured leg in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of neurocognitive reliance on jump distance and lower extremity kinematics in individuals who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This was achieved by comparing hop performance under standard and neurocognitive conditions.

Methods: Thirty-two patients after ACLR and 32 healthy controls (CTRL) participated. Both groups performed a single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) and two neurocognitive hop tests, each designed to evaluate distinct aspects of neurocognition. The neurocognitive tests included the reaction SLHD (R-SLHD), measuring reaction to a central stimulus and working memory SLHD (WM-SLHD) assessing response to a memorized stimulus amidst distractor stimuli. Distances were assessed for the three-hop tests. In addition, joint kinematics were collected to calculate lower extremity coordination of the lower extremity. SLHD performance was defined as the mean hop distance per condition per leg for each participant and was analyzed using a mixed ANOVA with condition and leg as the within-subjects factors and the group (ACLR or CTRL) as the between-subjects factor. Differences in joint coordination variability were analyzed using two-sample t-test statistical parametric mapping (SPM) with linear regression.

Results: The WM-SLHD resulted in a significantly decreased jump distance compared with the standard hop test both for ACLR and CTRL. Furthermore, the leg difference within the ACLR group increased under higher cognitive load as tested with the WM-SLHD, indicating leg-specific adaptations in lower extremity coordination.

Conclusions: Neurocognitive single-leg hop tests resulted in reduced jump distance in CTRL and ACLR. The neurocognitive hop test revealed changes in coordination variability for the CTRL and the uninjured leg of ACLR individuals, whereas the injured leg's coordination variability remained unaltered, suggesting persistent cognitive control of movements post-ACLR.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信