儿科后足对齐:后足力矩臂与后足对齐角度之间的关系。

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000002803
Nicolas Pascual-Leone, Joshua T Bram, Agnes D Cororaton, Howard J Hillstrom, Douglas N Mintz, Roger F Widmann, Scott J Ellis, David M Scher
{"title":"儿科后足对齐:后足力矩臂与后足对齐角度之间的关系。","authors":"Nicolas Pascual-Leone, Joshua T Bram, Agnes D Cororaton, Howard J Hillstrom, Douglas N Mintz, Roger F Widmann, Scott J Ellis, David M Scher","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various measurements are used to evaluate hindfoot alignment and determine appropriate treatment, though the best tool is not known. Few studies have examined the relationship between these measurements in pediatric patients. This study sought to compare Hindfoot Moment Arm (HMA) and Hindfoot Alignment Angle (HAA) in evaluation of pediatric hindfoot deformity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients by age: school-aged (7 to 10 years old), preadolescents (11 to 14), and adolescents (15 to 18). A total of 10 males and 10 females were randomly selected for each cohort from patients with available hindfoot radiographs. HMA and HAA were measured by 2 independent reviewers. Pearson correlation of HMA and HAA was performed by age cohort. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate the association of HMA and HAA adjusting for age, sex, height, and weight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were analyzed. Interrater reliability was found to be excellent for HMA and HAA (ICC=0.996 and 0.992, respectively). HMA was 8.7±9.4 mm in school age, 5.7±6.7 mm in preadolescents, and 2.5±13.0 mm among adolescents ( P =0.153). HAA was 6.3±9.7 degrees in school age, 6.7±8.6 degrees in preadolescents, and 6.0±14.5 degrees among adolescents ( P =0.983). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.78 (CI: 0.51-0.91) for school-aged, 0.92 (CI: 0.81-0.97) for preadolescents, and 0.86 (CI: 0.67-0.94) for adolescents. Using multivariable regression, each degree increase in HAA, increased HMA by 0.77 mm. Age, height, and weight were not found to be independent predictors of HMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HMA and HAA were both found to be reliable measurements across all age cohorts. When comparing across age cohorts, neither HMA nor HAA differed significantly ( P =0.153 and 0.983, respectively). Furthermore, Pearson correlation demonstrated a linear relationship between HMA and HAA. When evaluating hindfoot deformity, surgeons may assess hindfoot alignment via either HMA or HAA regardless of patient age. The authors support the use of HMA for clinical and academic purposes as HMA is considerably simpler to measure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"e49-e54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hindfoot Alignment in Pediatrics: The Relationship Between Hindfoot Moment Arm and Hindfoot Alignment Angle.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Pascual-Leone, Joshua T Bram, Agnes D Cororaton, Howard J Hillstrom, Douglas N Mintz, Roger F Widmann, Scott J Ellis, David M Scher\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various measurements are used to evaluate hindfoot alignment and determine appropriate treatment, though the best tool is not known. Few studies have examined the relationship between these measurements in pediatric patients. This study sought to compare Hindfoot Moment Arm (HMA) and Hindfoot Alignment Angle (HAA) in evaluation of pediatric hindfoot deformity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients by age: school-aged (7 to 10 years old), preadolescents (11 to 14), and adolescents (15 to 18). A total of 10 males and 10 females were randomly selected for each cohort from patients with available hindfoot radiographs. HMA and HAA were measured by 2 independent reviewers. Pearson correlation of HMA and HAA was performed by age cohort. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate the association of HMA and HAA adjusting for age, sex, height, and weight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were analyzed. Interrater reliability was found to be excellent for HMA and HAA (ICC=0.996 and 0.992, respectively). HMA was 8.7±9.4 mm in school age, 5.7±6.7 mm in preadolescents, and 2.5±13.0 mm among adolescents ( P =0.153). HAA was 6.3±9.7 degrees in school age, 6.7±8.6 degrees in preadolescents, and 6.0±14.5 degrees among adolescents ( P =0.983). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.78 (CI: 0.51-0.91) for school-aged, 0.92 (CI: 0.81-0.97) for preadolescents, and 0.86 (CI: 0.67-0.94) for adolescents. Using multivariable regression, each degree increase in HAA, increased HMA by 0.77 mm. Age, height, and weight were not found to be independent predictors of HMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HMA and HAA were both found to be reliable measurements across all age cohorts. When comparing across age cohorts, neither HMA nor HAA differed significantly ( P =0.153 and 0.983, respectively). Furthermore, Pearson correlation demonstrated a linear relationship between HMA and HAA. When evaluating hindfoot deformity, surgeons may assess hindfoot alignment via either HMA or HAA regardless of patient age. The authors support the use of HMA for clinical and academic purposes as HMA is considerably simpler to measure.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e49-e54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有多种测量方法可用于评估后足对齐情况并确定适当的治疗方法,但最佳工具尚不清楚。很少有研究对儿科患者这些测量值之间的关系进行研究。本研究旨在比较后足力矩臂(HMA)和后足对齐角(HAA)在评估小儿后足畸形中的作用:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为不同年龄段的儿科患者:学龄儿童(7 至 10 岁)、青少年前期(11 至 14 岁)和青少年(15 至 18 岁)。每个队列从有后足X光片的患者中随机抽取10名男性和10名女性。HMA 和 HAA 由两名独立的审查员进行测量。按年龄组对 HMA 和 HAA 进行皮尔逊相关性分析。在对年龄、性别、身高和体重进行调整后,采用多变量线性回归法研究 HMA 和 HAA 的相关性:对 60 名参与者进行了分析。结果发现,HMA 和 HAA 的互测可靠性极佳(ICC 分别为 0.996 和 0.992)。学龄儿童的HMA为(8.7±9.4)毫米,学龄前儿童为(5.7±6.7)毫米,青少年为(2.5±13.0)毫米(P=0.153)。学龄儿童的 HAA 为 6.3±9.7°,学龄前儿童为 6.7±8.6°,青少年为 6.0±14.5°(P=0.983)。学龄儿童的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.78(CI:0.51-0.91),学龄前儿童为 0.92(CI:0.81-0.97),青少年为 0.86(CI:0.67-0.94)。通过多变量回归,HAA 每增加一度,HMA 就增加 0.77 毫米。年龄、身高和体重并不是 HMA 的独立预测因素:结论:在所有年龄组中,HMA 和 HAA 都是可靠的测量指标。在不同年龄组间进行比较时,HMA 和 HAA 均无显著差异(P=0.153 和 0.983)。此外,皮尔逊相关性表明 HMA 和 HAA 之间存在线性关系。在评估后足畸形时,无论患者年龄多大,外科医生都可以通过 HMA 或 HAA 评估后足对齐情况。作者支持在临床和学术研究中使用HMA,因为HMA的测量要简单得多:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hindfoot Alignment in Pediatrics: The Relationship Between Hindfoot Moment Arm and Hindfoot Alignment Angle.

Background: Various measurements are used to evaluate hindfoot alignment and determine appropriate treatment, though the best tool is not known. Few studies have examined the relationship between these measurements in pediatric patients. This study sought to compare Hindfoot Moment Arm (HMA) and Hindfoot Alignment Angle (HAA) in evaluation of pediatric hindfoot deformity.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients by age: school-aged (7 to 10 years old), preadolescents (11 to 14), and adolescents (15 to 18). A total of 10 males and 10 females were randomly selected for each cohort from patients with available hindfoot radiographs. HMA and HAA were measured by 2 independent reviewers. Pearson correlation of HMA and HAA was performed by age cohort. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate the association of HMA and HAA adjusting for age, sex, height, and weight.

Results: Sixty participants were analyzed. Interrater reliability was found to be excellent for HMA and HAA (ICC=0.996 and 0.992, respectively). HMA was 8.7±9.4 mm in school age, 5.7±6.7 mm in preadolescents, and 2.5±13.0 mm among adolescents ( P =0.153). HAA was 6.3±9.7 degrees in school age, 6.7±8.6 degrees in preadolescents, and 6.0±14.5 degrees among adolescents ( P =0.983). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.78 (CI: 0.51-0.91) for school-aged, 0.92 (CI: 0.81-0.97) for preadolescents, and 0.86 (CI: 0.67-0.94) for adolescents. Using multivariable regression, each degree increase in HAA, increased HMA by 0.77 mm. Age, height, and weight were not found to be independent predictors of HMA.

Conclusions: HMA and HAA were both found to be reliable measurements across all age cohorts. When comparing across age cohorts, neither HMA nor HAA differed significantly ( P =0.153 and 0.983, respectively). Furthermore, Pearson correlation demonstrated a linear relationship between HMA and HAA. When evaluating hindfoot deformity, surgeons may assess hindfoot alignment via either HMA or HAA regardless of patient age. The authors support the use of HMA for clinical and academic purposes as HMA is considerably simpler to measure.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信