蛋白酶体抑制剂和唑来膦酸一线联合治疗可有效减少多发性骨髓瘤后期骨折,与诊断时的多发性骨髓瘤骨病无关。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Veera Eskelinen, Elise Nivakoski, Kirsi Launonen, Anu Partanen, Sakari Kakko, Milla E L Kuusisto
{"title":"蛋白酶体抑制剂和唑来膦酸一线联合治疗可有效减少多发性骨髓瘤后期骨折,与诊断时的多发性骨髓瘤骨病无关。","authors":"Veera Eskelinen, Elise Nivakoski, Kirsi Launonen, Anu Partanen, Sakari Kakko, Milla E L Kuusisto","doi":"10.3390/hematolrep16030051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study provides real-world evidence on the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease with various bisphosphonates combined for different myeloma-specific treatments as no validated data regarding the best combination treatment for bone disease associated with MM are available. We examined retrospectively 345 MM patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation in Finland during 1996-2020. The median age of the patients was 60 years with a median follow-up time of 50 months (1-339). At diagnosis, 72.1% of the patients had myeloma-associated bone disease and 45.8% had fractures. Most patients (58.8%) received proteasome inhibitor (PI)-containing treatment at first line. MM bone disease was treated in 91.6% of the patients; 49.9% received zoledronic acid (ZA) and 29.9% pamidronate. Inferior overall survival was associated with MM bone disease at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.005) or a fracture at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.003). A later fracture was identified in 29% of the patients, and in those patients without MM bone disease at diagnosis later fractures were less common after ZA treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.049). PI-based treatment plus ZA (<i>p</i> = 0.019) seemed to be the best combination to prevent later fractures, even though the same patient subgroup was more likely to experience relapse (<i>p</i> = 0.018), and also when excluding patients with previous induction therapy without novel agents (<i>p</i> = 0.008). To conclude, this study suggests that the best therapy to prevent later fractures in MM might be PI-based treatment combined with ZA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12829,"journal":{"name":"Hematology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-Line Combination with Proteasome Inhibitor-Based Treatment and Zoledronic Acid Is Effective in Reducing Later Fractures in Multiple Myeloma Irrespective of Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease at Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Veera Eskelinen, Elise Nivakoski, Kirsi Launonen, Anu Partanen, Sakari Kakko, Milla E L Kuusisto\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/hematolrep16030051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study provides real-world evidence on the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease with various bisphosphonates combined for different myeloma-specific treatments as no validated data regarding the best combination treatment for bone disease associated with MM are available. We examined retrospectively 345 MM patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation in Finland during 1996-2020. The median age of the patients was 60 years with a median follow-up time of 50 months (1-339). At diagnosis, 72.1% of the patients had myeloma-associated bone disease and 45.8% had fractures. Most patients (58.8%) received proteasome inhibitor (PI)-containing treatment at first line. MM bone disease was treated in 91.6% of the patients; 49.9% received zoledronic acid (ZA) and 29.9% pamidronate. Inferior overall survival was associated with MM bone disease at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.005) or a fracture at diagnosis (<i>p</i> = 0.003). A later fracture was identified in 29% of the patients, and in those patients without MM bone disease at diagnosis later fractures were less common after ZA treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.049). PI-based treatment plus ZA (<i>p</i> = 0.019) seemed to be the best combination to prevent later fractures, even though the same patient subgroup was more likely to experience relapse (<i>p</i> = 0.018), and also when excluding patients with previous induction therapy without novel agents (<i>p</i> = 0.008). To conclude, this study suggests that the best therapy to prevent later fractures in MM might be PI-based treatment combined with ZA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep16030051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep16030051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于目前还没有关于治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)相关骨病的最佳联合疗法的有效数据,本研究提供了使用各种双膦酸盐联合不同骨髓瘤特异性疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)骨病的实际证据。我们回顾性研究了1996-2020年间在芬兰接受自体干细胞移植治疗的345名MM患者。患者的中位年龄为60岁,中位随访时间为50个月(1-339)。确诊时,72.1%的患者患有骨髓瘤相关骨病,45.8%的患者有骨折。大多数患者(58.8%)接受了含蛋白酶体抑制剂(PI)的一线治疗。91.6%的患者接受了骨髓瘤骨病治疗;49.9%接受了唑来膦酸(ZA)治疗,29.9%接受了帕米膦酸盐治疗。总生存率较低与确诊时患有 MM 骨病(p = 0.005)或确诊时骨折(p = 0.003)有关。29%的患者后来发生了骨折,在诊断时没有MM骨病的患者中,ZA治疗后发生骨折的比例较低(p = 0.049)。以 PI 为基础的治疗加 ZA(p = 0.019)似乎是预防后期骨折的最佳组合,尽管同一患者亚群更有可能复发(p = 0.018),而且在排除既往接受过诱导治疗但未使用新型药物的患者时也是如此(p = 0.008)。总之,本研究表明,预防MM日后骨折的最佳疗法可能是基于PI的治疗联合ZA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-Line Combination with Proteasome Inhibitor-Based Treatment and Zoledronic Acid Is Effective in Reducing Later Fractures in Multiple Myeloma Irrespective of Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease at Diagnosis.

The present study provides real-world evidence on the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) bone disease with various bisphosphonates combined for different myeloma-specific treatments as no validated data regarding the best combination treatment for bone disease associated with MM are available. We examined retrospectively 345 MM patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation in Finland during 1996-2020. The median age of the patients was 60 years with a median follow-up time of 50 months (1-339). At diagnosis, 72.1% of the patients had myeloma-associated bone disease and 45.8% had fractures. Most patients (58.8%) received proteasome inhibitor (PI)-containing treatment at first line. MM bone disease was treated in 91.6% of the patients; 49.9% received zoledronic acid (ZA) and 29.9% pamidronate. Inferior overall survival was associated with MM bone disease at diagnosis (p = 0.005) or a fracture at diagnosis (p = 0.003). A later fracture was identified in 29% of the patients, and in those patients without MM bone disease at diagnosis later fractures were less common after ZA treatment (p = 0.049). PI-based treatment plus ZA (p = 0.019) seemed to be the best combination to prevent later fractures, even though the same patient subgroup was more likely to experience relapse (p = 0.018), and also when excluding patients with previous induction therapy without novel agents (p = 0.008). To conclude, this study suggests that the best therapy to prevent later fractures in MM might be PI-based treatment combined with ZA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology Reports
Hematology Reports HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信