一项随机交叉试验,评估义齿粘合剂对局部义齿佩戴者防止食物渗入的作用。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Julie Grender, Malgorzata Klukowska, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman
{"title":"一项随机交叉试验,评估义齿粘合剂对局部义齿佩戴者防止食物渗入的作用。","authors":"Julie Grender, Malgorzata Klukowska, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This two-treatment, four-period, double-blind, randomized controlled crossover trial assessed the ability of two denture adhesives, both applied with a thin nozzle in a continuous application pattern, to prevent food infiltration beneath partial dentures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with mandibular partial dentures and a history of food particle infiltration were enrolled. All participants used both an optimized calcium/zinc partial salt of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid (PVM/MA) denture adhesive and a calcium/sodium partial salt of PVM/MA test denture adhesive, twice each, throughout four study periods, according to a randomly assigned sequence. At each visit, participants underwent two assessments: once with no denture adhesive (baseline) and once with denture adhesive, 1 hour after adhesive application. For each assessment, participants ate one-half of the top of a poppy seed muffin, and a dental professional counted the seeds retained on the denture and mucosa, which was the primary variable. The change-from-baseline comparison was made for each treatment separately using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon Signed Rank test depending on the normality of the data. A between-treatment comparison for the change from baseline was performed using a crossover ANCOVA with treatment and period as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. The baseline poppy seed count was used as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 participants were enrolled; 29 completed the trial. Both denture adhesives achieved statistically significantly fewer retained seeds versus baseline (P< 0.001). The calcium/zinc adhesive reduced the seed count from baseline by 85.9% (6.18 vs 0.86), and the calcium/ sodium adhesive reduced seed count by 76.6% (6.04 vs 1.43). Comparing the two denture adhesives, the reduction in seed count from baseline was statistically significantly greater for the calcium/zinc adhesive versus the calcium/sodium formulation (P= 0.008).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These results support the recommendation of denture adhesive use for the prevention of food infiltration beneath partial dentures, with optimized calcium/zinc denture adhesive showing the greatest prevention benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 4","pages":"216-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized crossover trial assessing denture adhesive for prevention of food infiltration among partial denture wearers.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Grender, Malgorzata Klukowska, Kimberly Milleman, Jeffery Milleman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This two-treatment, four-period, double-blind, randomized controlled crossover trial assessed the ability of two denture adhesives, both applied with a thin nozzle in a continuous application pattern, to prevent food infiltration beneath partial dentures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with mandibular partial dentures and a history of food particle infiltration were enrolled. All participants used both an optimized calcium/zinc partial salt of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid (PVM/MA) denture adhesive and a calcium/sodium partial salt of PVM/MA test denture adhesive, twice each, throughout four study periods, according to a randomly assigned sequence. At each visit, participants underwent two assessments: once with no denture adhesive (baseline) and once with denture adhesive, 1 hour after adhesive application. For each assessment, participants ate one-half of the top of a poppy seed muffin, and a dental professional counted the seeds retained on the denture and mucosa, which was the primary variable. The change-from-baseline comparison was made for each treatment separately using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon Signed Rank test depending on the normality of the data. A between-treatment comparison for the change from baseline was performed using a crossover ANCOVA with treatment and period as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. The baseline poppy seed count was used as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 participants were enrolled; 29 completed the trial. Both denture adhesives achieved statistically significantly fewer retained seeds versus baseline (P< 0.001). The calcium/zinc adhesive reduced the seed count from baseline by 85.9% (6.18 vs 0.86), and the calcium/ sodium adhesive reduced seed count by 76.6% (6.04 vs 1.43). Comparing the two denture adhesives, the reduction in seed count from baseline was statistically significantly greater for the calcium/zinc adhesive versus the calcium/sodium formulation (P= 0.008).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These results support the recommendation of denture adhesive use for the prevention of food infiltration beneath partial dentures, with optimized calcium/zinc denture adhesive showing the greatest prevention benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"216-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项双盲、随机对照交叉试验分为两个疗程、四个阶段,评估了两种义齿粘合剂防止食物渗入局部义齿下方的能力:方法:试验招募了下颌局部义齿和有食物颗粒渗入史的参与者。所有参与者都按照随机分配的顺序,在四个研究期间使用了优化的聚乙烯甲基醚/马来酸(PVM/MA)钙/锌部分盐义齿粘接剂和PVM/MA钙/钠部分盐试验义齿粘接剂,各两次。在每次就诊时,参与者都要接受两次评估:一次是在未使用义齿粘接剂的情况下(基线),另一次是在使用义齿粘接剂 1 小时后。在每次评估中,参与者都要吃掉罂粟籽松饼顶部的一半,然后由牙科专业人员对义齿和粘膜上残留的罂粟籽进行计数,这是主要变量。根据数据的正态性,分别使用配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon Signed Rank 检验对每种治疗方法与基线相比的变化进行比较。基线变化的治疗间比较采用交叉方差分析,以治疗和治疗期为固定效应,参与者为随机效应。基线罂粟种子数被用作协变量:结果:30 位参与者参加了试验,29 位完成了试验。与基线相比,两种义齿粘接剂都明显减少了罂粟籽的残留量(P< 0.001)。钙/锌粘接剂可将种子数量从基线减少 85.9% (6.18 vs 0.86),而钙/钠粘接剂可将种子数量减少 76.6% (6.04 vs 1.43)。比较两种义齿粘合剂,钙/锌粘合剂与钙/钠配方相比,种子数量从基线减少的幅度在统计学上明显更大(P= 0.008):这些结果支持使用义齿粘接剂预防食物渗入局部义齿下方的建议,优化的钙/锌义齿粘接剂显示出最大的预防效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A randomized crossover trial assessing denture adhesive for prevention of food infiltration among partial denture wearers.

Purpose: This two-treatment, four-period, double-blind, randomized controlled crossover trial assessed the ability of two denture adhesives, both applied with a thin nozzle in a continuous application pattern, to prevent food infiltration beneath partial dentures.

Methods: Participants with mandibular partial dentures and a history of food particle infiltration were enrolled. All participants used both an optimized calcium/zinc partial salt of polyvinyl methyl ether/maleic acid (PVM/MA) denture adhesive and a calcium/sodium partial salt of PVM/MA test denture adhesive, twice each, throughout four study periods, according to a randomly assigned sequence. At each visit, participants underwent two assessments: once with no denture adhesive (baseline) and once with denture adhesive, 1 hour after adhesive application. For each assessment, participants ate one-half of the top of a poppy seed muffin, and a dental professional counted the seeds retained on the denture and mucosa, which was the primary variable. The change-from-baseline comparison was made for each treatment separately using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon Signed Rank test depending on the normality of the data. A between-treatment comparison for the change from baseline was performed using a crossover ANCOVA with treatment and period as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. The baseline poppy seed count was used as a covariate.

Results: 30 participants were enrolled; 29 completed the trial. Both denture adhesives achieved statistically significantly fewer retained seeds versus baseline (P< 0.001). The calcium/zinc adhesive reduced the seed count from baseline by 85.9% (6.18 vs 0.86), and the calcium/ sodium adhesive reduced seed count by 76.6% (6.04 vs 1.43). Comparing the two denture adhesives, the reduction in seed count from baseline was statistically significantly greater for the calcium/zinc adhesive versus the calcium/sodium formulation (P= 0.008).

Clinical significance: These results support the recommendation of denture adhesive use for the prevention of food infiltration beneath partial dentures, with optimized calcium/zinc denture adhesive showing the greatest prevention benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信