特布他林与慢性阻塞性肺疾病膈肌功能:一项双盲随机临床试验

James K. Stoller , Herbert P. Wiedemann , Jacob Loke, Peter Snyder, James Virgulto, Richard A. Matthay
{"title":"特布他林与慢性阻塞性肺疾病膈肌功能:一项双盲随机临床试验","authors":"James K. Stoller ,&nbsp;Herbert P. Wiedemann ,&nbsp;Jacob Loke,&nbsp;Peter Snyder,&nbsp;James Virgulto,&nbsp;Richard A. Matthay","doi":"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether oral terbutaline (2.5 mg orally three times daily for a week) increased the force of diaphragmatic contraction in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ten patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction completed the trial. Compared with placebo, terbutaline produced a mean increase of 5.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in peak inspiratory mouth pressure and a mean increase of 5.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in transdiaphragmatic pressure during a maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. These small changes with terbutaline failed to achieve statistical significance. Also, terbutaline failed to alter flow rates (FEV<sub>1</sub>, <span><math><mtext>V</mtext><mtext>̇</mtext><msub><mi></mi><mn>max50</mn></msub></math></span>) or patients' dyspnoea ratings using two separate clinical scales (Pneumoconiosis Research Unit Score and the Modified Dyspnoea Index). Because all observed changes in respiratory muscle strength were small and because the trial had power to detect small changes in inspiratory mouth pressures, we suggest that oral terbutaline at the dose administered in this study has little noteworthy effect on respiratory muscle strength in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75618,"journal":{"name":"British journal of diseases of the chest","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 242-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terbutaline and diaphragm function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"James K. Stoller ,&nbsp;Herbert P. Wiedemann ,&nbsp;Jacob Loke,&nbsp;Peter Snyder,&nbsp;James Virgulto,&nbsp;Richard A. Matthay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether oral terbutaline (2.5 mg orally three times daily for a week) increased the force of diaphragmatic contraction in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ten patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction completed the trial. Compared with placebo, terbutaline produced a mean increase of 5.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in peak inspiratory mouth pressure and a mean increase of 5.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in transdiaphragmatic pressure during a maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. These small changes with terbutaline failed to achieve statistical significance. Also, terbutaline failed to alter flow rates (FEV<sub>1</sub>, <span><math><mtext>V</mtext><mtext>̇</mtext><msub><mi></mi><mn>max50</mn></msub></math></span>) or patients' dyspnoea ratings using two separate clinical scales (Pneumoconiosis Research Unit Score and the Modified Dyspnoea Index). Because all observed changes in respiratory muscle strength were small and because the trial had power to detect small changes in inspiratory mouth pressures, we suggest that oral terbutaline at the dose administered in this study has little noteworthy effect on respiratory muscle strength in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-0971(88)90064-2\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of diseases of the chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of diseases of the chest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007097188900642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

我们进行了一项双盲、随机交叉试验,以评估口服特布他林(2.5 mg,每日口服三次,持续一周)是否能增加慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的膈肌收缩力。10名中度至重度气道阻塞患者完成了试验。与安慰剂相比,特布他林在最大吸气操作期间产生的峰值吸气口压平均增加5.8 cmH2O,经膈压力平均增加5.0 cmH2O。特布他林的这些微小变化没有达到统计学意义。此外,特布他林未能改变流速(FEV1、V * max50)或使用两个独立的临床量表(尘肺研究单位评分和改良呼吸困难指数)对患者的呼吸困难评分。由于所有观察到的呼吸肌力量的变化都很小,并且由于试验能够检测到吸气口压的微小变化,因此我们认为,在本研究中给予的剂量口服特布他林对慢性阻塞性肺疾病正常呼吸负荷患者的呼吸肌力量几乎没有值得注意的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Terbutaline and diaphragm function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

We conducted a double-blind, randomized crossover trial to evaluate whether oral terbutaline (2.5 mg orally three times daily for a week) increased the force of diaphragmatic contraction in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ten patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction completed the trial. Compared with placebo, terbutaline produced a mean increase of 5.8 cmH2O in peak inspiratory mouth pressure and a mean increase of 5.0 cmH2O in transdiaphragmatic pressure during a maximal inspiratory manoeuvre. These small changes with terbutaline failed to achieve statistical significance. Also, terbutaline failed to alter flow rates (FEV1, V̇max50) or patients' dyspnoea ratings using two separate clinical scales (Pneumoconiosis Research Unit Score and the Modified Dyspnoea Index). Because all observed changes in respiratory muscle strength were small and because the trial had power to detect small changes in inspiratory mouth pressures, we suggest that oral terbutaline at the dose administered in this study has little noteworthy effect on respiratory muscle strength in normocapnic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信