帕克伍德的 VIP4SCI 平台:为脊髓损伤患者提供的虚拟电子健康自我管理解决方案。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241272618
Luxshmi Nageswaran, Charlie Giurleo, Merna Seliman, Heather K Askes, Zeina Abu-Jurji, B Catherine Craven, Anna Kras-Dupuis, Julie Watson, Dalton L Wolfe
{"title":"帕克伍德的 VIP4SCI 平台:为脊髓损伤患者提供的虚拟电子健康自我管理解决方案。","authors":"Luxshmi Nageswaran, Charlie Giurleo, Merna Seliman, Heather K Askes, Zeina Abu-Jurji, B Catherine Craven, Anna Kras-Dupuis, Julie Watson, Dalton L Wolfe","doi":"10.1177/20552076241272618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Parkwood VIP4SCI platform is a virtual e-health solution adapted from a version created for Spinal Cord Injury Ontario (SCIO) that focused on self-management skill development for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) transitioning between stages of care, in partnership with caregivers and clinicians. This evaluation of the platform informs the usability and feasibility of a model to facilitate service care aims postrehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong><b>Participants:</b> Inpatients and outpatients admitted to the SCI Rehabilitation Program (n = 31), and a mix of interdisciplinary clinicians on the Rehabilitation Team (n = 20). Caregivers participated at the discretion of the patient.<b>Interventions:</b> Inpatients were randomized into two groups (Platform or Standard Care (i.e., delayed access)). Outpatients were given access at enrollment. Pre-post assessments were completed using surveys, and platform analytics were collected. Weekly check-ins were introduced to increase engagement. Focus groups were held with a subset of participants near study completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VIP4SCI was viewed as usable and feasible. Platform satisfaction assessed on a -3 to +3 scale ranged from +0.9 to 2.5, demonstrating positive agreement. Self-efficacy related to self-management ranged from 5.4 to 7.6 out of 10. The educational resource hub was identified as the most beneficial feature. Lack of clinician uptake was a barrier to integration into day-to-day practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Platform usage was low among all groups despite the perceived need for facilitating care coordination with consistent and intentional self-management programming. Despite the lack of uptake, partly due to challenges associated with the pandemic, conclusions on platform features and barriers to implementation will help to inform future programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parkwood's VIP4SCI platform: A virtual e-health self-management solution for persons with spinal cord injury across the care continuum.\",\"authors\":\"Luxshmi Nageswaran, Charlie Giurleo, Merna Seliman, Heather K Askes, Zeina Abu-Jurji, B Catherine Craven, Anna Kras-Dupuis, Julie Watson, Dalton L Wolfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241272618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Parkwood VIP4SCI platform is a virtual e-health solution adapted from a version created for Spinal Cord Injury Ontario (SCIO) that focused on self-management skill development for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) transitioning between stages of care, in partnership with caregivers and clinicians. This evaluation of the platform informs the usability and feasibility of a model to facilitate service care aims postrehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong><b>Participants:</b> Inpatients and outpatients admitted to the SCI Rehabilitation Program (n = 31), and a mix of interdisciplinary clinicians on the Rehabilitation Team (n = 20). Caregivers participated at the discretion of the patient.<b>Interventions:</b> Inpatients were randomized into two groups (Platform or Standard Care (i.e., delayed access)). Outpatients were given access at enrollment. Pre-post assessments were completed using surveys, and platform analytics were collected. Weekly check-ins were introduced to increase engagement. Focus groups were held with a subset of participants near study completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VIP4SCI was viewed as usable and feasible. Platform satisfaction assessed on a -3 to +3 scale ranged from +0.9 to 2.5, demonstrating positive agreement. Self-efficacy related to self-management ranged from 5.4 to 7.6 out of 10. The educational resource hub was identified as the most beneficial feature. Lack of clinician uptake was a barrier to integration into day-to-day practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Platform usage was low among all groups despite the perceived need for facilitating care coordination with consistent and intentional self-management programming. Despite the lack of uptake, partly due to challenges associated with the pandemic, conclusions on platform features and barriers to implementation will help to inform future programming.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241272618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241272618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:帕克伍德 VIP4SCI 平台是一个虚拟电子健康解决方案,它改编自为安大略省脊髓损伤协会(SCIO)创建的版本,该版本的重点是与护理人员和临床医生合作,为在护理阶段之间过渡的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者开发自我管理技能。通过对该平台的评估,可以了解促进康复后服务护理目标的模式的可用性和可行性:设计:参与者:SCI 康复项目的住院和门诊患者(31 人),以及康复团队的跨学科临床医生(20 人)。护理人员的参与由患者自行决定:住院患者随机分为两组(平台组或标准护理组(即延迟使用组))。门诊患者在入院时即可使用。通过调查完成事后评估,并收集平台分析数据。引入每周签到以提高参与度。在研究即将结束时,与部分参与者进行了焦点小组讨论:结果:VIP4SCI 被认为是可用和可行的。平台满意度按-3 至 +3量表进行评估,从+0.9到2.5不等,显示出积极的一致性。与自我管理相关的自我效能感在 5.4 到 7.6 之间(满分 10 分)。教育资源中心被认为是最有益的功能。缺乏临床医生的参与是将其融入日常实践的一个障碍:尽管认为有必要通过持续、有意识的自我管理计划来促进护理协调,但平台在所有群体中的使用率都很低。尽管部分由于与大流行病相关的挑战而导致使用率不高,但关于平台功能和实施障碍的结论将有助于为未来的计划提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parkwood's VIP4SCI platform: A virtual e-health self-management solution for persons with spinal cord injury across the care continuum.

Objective: Parkwood VIP4SCI platform is a virtual e-health solution adapted from a version created for Spinal Cord Injury Ontario (SCIO) that focused on self-management skill development for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) transitioning between stages of care, in partnership with caregivers and clinicians. This evaluation of the platform informs the usability and feasibility of a model to facilitate service care aims postrehabilitation.

Design: Participants: Inpatients and outpatients admitted to the SCI Rehabilitation Program (n = 31), and a mix of interdisciplinary clinicians on the Rehabilitation Team (n = 20). Caregivers participated at the discretion of the patient.Interventions: Inpatients were randomized into two groups (Platform or Standard Care (i.e., delayed access)). Outpatients were given access at enrollment. Pre-post assessments were completed using surveys, and platform analytics were collected. Weekly check-ins were introduced to increase engagement. Focus groups were held with a subset of participants near study completion.

Results: VIP4SCI was viewed as usable and feasible. Platform satisfaction assessed on a -3 to +3 scale ranged from +0.9 to 2.5, demonstrating positive agreement. Self-efficacy related to self-management ranged from 5.4 to 7.6 out of 10. The educational resource hub was identified as the most beneficial feature. Lack of clinician uptake was a barrier to integration into day-to-day practice.

Conclusions: Platform usage was low among all groups despite the perceived need for facilitating care coordination with consistent and intentional self-management programming. Despite the lack of uptake, partly due to challenges associated with the pandemic, conclusions on platform features and barriers to implementation will help to inform future programming.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信