中枢间歇θ-脉冲刺激结合重复外周磁刺激对中风患者上肢功能的影响。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Colombia Medica Pub Date : 2023-12-30 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.25100/cm.v54i4.5766
Shangrong Jiang, Tingtin Han, Zhijie Zhang, Mingming Wen, Yongping Li
{"title":"中枢间歇θ-脉冲刺激结合重复外周磁刺激对中风患者上肢功能的影响。","authors":"Shangrong Jiang, Tingtin Han, Zhijie Zhang, Mingming Wen, Yongping Li","doi":"10.25100/cm.v54i4.5766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation can improve motor function in poststroke patients, but the therapeutic effect of this combination remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the CMS (n = 18), peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) (n = 19) and CPS (n = 19) groups. The CMS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and peripheral false stimulation, while the PMS group received repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation and central false stimulation once a day for five days a week over four weeks. The CPS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation simultaneously once daily for four weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, Modified Barthel Index and Modified Ashworth Scale evaluated outcomes before and after four weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The motor function scores of all groups were significantly increased after treatment compared with before treatment, while the Modified Ashworth Scale score showed no significant change. There was a significant difference in the motor function score of the CPS group compared with that of the CMS and PMS groups, but there was no significant improvement in the Modified Ashworth Scale score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the two treatment methods can improve patients' motor function and daily living abilities but cannot improve muscle tone.</p>","PeriodicalId":50667,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function in stroke patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shangrong Jiang, Tingtin Han, Zhijie Zhang, Mingming Wen, Yongping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.25100/cm.v54i4.5766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation can improve motor function in poststroke patients, but the therapeutic effect of this combination remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the CMS (n = 18), peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) (n = 19) and CPS (n = 19) groups. The CMS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and peripheral false stimulation, while the PMS group received repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation and central false stimulation once a day for five days a week over four weeks. The CPS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation simultaneously once daily for four weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, Modified Barthel Index and Modified Ashworth Scale evaluated outcomes before and after four weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The motor function scores of all groups were significantly increased after treatment compared with before treatment, while the Modified Ashworth Scale score showed no significant change. There was a significant difference in the motor function score of the CPS group compared with that of the CMS and PMS groups, but there was no significant improvement in the Modified Ashworth Scale score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the two treatment methods can improve patients' motor function and daily living abilities but cannot improve muscle tone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colombia Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colombia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v54i4.5766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v54i4.5766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:间歇性θ-脉冲刺激和重复性外周磁刺激可以改善卒中后患者的运动功能,但这种组合的治疗效果仍不明确:目的:确定中枢间歇θ-脉冲刺激和重复外周磁刺激对上肢功能的影响:将 56 名亚急性中风患者随机分配到三组:CMS 组(18 人)、外周磁刺激组(19 人)和 CPS 组(19 人)。CMS组接受间歇性θ-脉冲刺激和外周假刺激,而PMS组接受重复性外周磁刺激和中枢假刺激,每天一次,每周五天,持续四周。CPS 组接受间歇性θ-脉冲刺激和重复性外周磁刺激,每天一次,持续四周。Fugl-Meyer 评估、行动研究手臂测试、改良 Barthel 指数和改良 Ashworth 量表对治疗四周前后的结果进行了评估:结果:与治疗前相比,治疗后各组的运动功能评分均有明显提高,而改良阿什沃斯量表评分则无明显变化。CPS组的运动功能评分与CMS组和PMS组相比有明显差异,但改良阿什沃斯量表评分没有明显改善:结论:两种治疗方法联合使用可改善患者的运动功能和日常生活能力,但不能改善肌张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function in stroke patients.

Background: Intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation can improve motor function in poststroke patients, but the therapeutic effect of this combination remains unclear.

Objective: To determine the effects of central intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb function.

Methods: Fifty-six subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to three groups: the CMS (n = 18), peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS) (n = 19) and CPS (n = 19) groups. The CMS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and peripheral false stimulation, while the PMS group received repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation and central false stimulation once a day for five days a week over four weeks. The CPS group received intermittent theta-burst stimulation and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation simultaneously once daily for four weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Action Research Arm Test, Modified Barthel Index and Modified Ashworth Scale evaluated outcomes before and after four weeks of treatment.

Results: The motor function scores of all groups were significantly increased after treatment compared with before treatment, while the Modified Ashworth Scale score showed no significant change. There was a significant difference in the motor function score of the CPS group compared with that of the CMS and PMS groups, but there was no significant improvement in the Modified Ashworth Scale score.

Conclusion: Combining the two treatment methods can improve patients' motor function and daily living abilities but cannot improve muscle tone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colombia Medica
Colombia Medica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Colombia Médica is an international peer-reviewed medical journal that will consider any original contribution that advances or illuminates medical science or practice, or that educates to the journal''s’ readers.The journal is owned by a non-profit organization, Universidad del Valle, and serves the scientific community strictly following the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) recommendations of policies on publication ethics policies for medical journals. Colombia Médica publishes original research articles, viewpoints and reviews in all areas of medical science and clinical practice. However, Colombia Médica gives the highest priority to papers on general and internal medicine, public health and primary health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信