培训和评估质量控制审核员对技术辅助抽取真实世界数据的重要性:案例研究。

Q4 Medicine
Journal of registry management Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Arelis Hernandez, Victoria Sweeney, Amelia Deitsch, Katherine Levie, Lori Boice, Kimberlie Lloyd, Jessica Martin, Marianna Wicks, Louise Widmer
{"title":"培训和评估质量控制审核员对技术辅助抽取真实世界数据的重要性:案例研究。","authors":"Arelis Hernandez, Victoria Sweeney, Amelia Deitsch, Katherine Levie, Lori Boice, Kimberlie Lloyd, Jessica Martin, Marianna Wicks, Louise Widmer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate cancer registry data is crucial for understanding cancer prevention and treatment strategies. Proper education and training are key for successful quality control (QC) programs and an evaluation process is needed to assess effectiveness. Syapse developed a rigorous QC training program that includes a peer review process to assess data quality and an interrater review (IRR) program to evaluate the consistency of QC reviewers. In reviewing IRR cases, we found high rates of agreement in various cancer types: colon (97.74%), prostate (97.75%), ovarian (96.31%), lung (98.03%), breast (97.86%), and bladder (97.88%). A peer review experience questionnaire was also administered. Results indicated that the program facilitated the acquisition of new skills. Through the implementation of robust QC training and assessment procedures for technology-enabled data curation, our Oncology Data Specialist (ODS)-certified professionals at Syapse ensure data quality in a real-world evidence (RWE) platform. QC reviewers deserve an extensive investment in training and professional development to uphold data quality and support cancer research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":39246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of registry management","volume":"51 2","pages":"81-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of Training and Assessing Quality Control Reviewers in Technology-Enabled Abstraction of Real-World Data: A Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Arelis Hernandez, Victoria Sweeney, Amelia Deitsch, Katherine Levie, Lori Boice, Kimberlie Lloyd, Jessica Martin, Marianna Wicks, Louise Widmer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate cancer registry data is crucial for understanding cancer prevention and treatment strategies. Proper education and training are key for successful quality control (QC) programs and an evaluation process is needed to assess effectiveness. Syapse developed a rigorous QC training program that includes a peer review process to assess data quality and an interrater review (IRR) program to evaluate the consistency of QC reviewers. In reviewing IRR cases, we found high rates of agreement in various cancer types: colon (97.74%), prostate (97.75%), ovarian (96.31%), lung (98.03%), breast (97.86%), and bladder (97.88%). A peer review experience questionnaire was also administered. Results indicated that the program facilitated the acquisition of new skills. Through the implementation of robust QC training and assessment procedures for technology-enabled data curation, our Oncology Data Specialist (ODS)-certified professionals at Syapse ensure data quality in a real-world evidence (RWE) platform. QC reviewers deserve an extensive investment in training and professional development to uphold data quality and support cancer research efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of registry management\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"81-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343427/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of registry management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of registry management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的癌症登记数据对于了解癌症预防和治疗策略至关重要。适当的教育和培训是质量控制 (QC) 计划取得成功的关键,同时还需要一个评估流程来评估其有效性。Syapse 制定了严格的质量控制培训计划,其中包括评估数据质量的同行评审程序和评估质量控制评审员一致性的互评 (IRR) 程序。在审查 IRR 案例时,我们发现各种癌症类型的一致性都很高:结肠癌(97.74%)、前列腺癌(97.75%)、卵巢癌(96.31%)、肺癌(98.03%)、乳腺癌(97.86%)和膀胱癌(97.88%)。此外,还进行了同行评审经验问卷调查。结果表明,该计划促进了新技能的掌握。通过对技术驱动的数据整理实施强有力的质量控制培训和评估程序,Syapse 公司获得肿瘤数据专家 (ODS) 认证的专业人员确保了真实世界证据 (RWE) 平台的数据质量。质量控制审核员应在培训和职业发展方面进行广泛投资,以维护数据质量并支持癌症研究工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Importance of Training and Assessing Quality Control Reviewers in Technology-Enabled Abstraction of Real-World Data: A Case Study.

Accurate cancer registry data is crucial for understanding cancer prevention and treatment strategies. Proper education and training are key for successful quality control (QC) programs and an evaluation process is needed to assess effectiveness. Syapse developed a rigorous QC training program that includes a peer review process to assess data quality and an interrater review (IRR) program to evaluate the consistency of QC reviewers. In reviewing IRR cases, we found high rates of agreement in various cancer types: colon (97.74%), prostate (97.75%), ovarian (96.31%), lung (98.03%), breast (97.86%), and bladder (97.88%). A peer review experience questionnaire was also administered. Results indicated that the program facilitated the acquisition of new skills. Through the implementation of robust QC training and assessment procedures for technology-enabled data curation, our Oncology Data Specialist (ODS)-certified professionals at Syapse ensure data quality in a real-world evidence (RWE) platform. QC reviewers deserve an extensive investment in training and professional development to uphold data quality and support cancer research efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of registry management
Journal of registry management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信