在治疗患有股骨髋臼撞击症的年轻成年人时,带或不带髋臼唇修补术的骨软骨成形术比带或不带髋臼唇修补术的关节镜灌洗术更具成本效益:基于随机对照试验数据的成本效用分析。

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jiajun Yan , Brittany Humphries , Zhenyan Bo , Ling Dai , Nicole Simunovic , Feng Xie , Olufemi R. Ayeni
{"title":"在治疗患有股骨髋臼撞击症的年轻成年人时,带或不带髋臼唇修补术的骨软骨成形术比带或不带髋臼唇修补术的关节镜灌洗术更具成本效益:基于随机对照试验数据的成本效用分析。","authors":"Jiajun Yan ,&nbsp;Brittany Humphries ,&nbsp;Zhenyan Bo ,&nbsp;Ling Dai ,&nbsp;Nicole Simunovic ,&nbsp;Feng Xie ,&nbsp;Olufemi R. Ayeni","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to conduct a cost–utility analysis of osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) from a Canadian public payer perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Markov model was constructed to compare the lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of the two treatment strategies. The target population was surgical FAI patients aged 36 years. The primary data source was patient-level data from the Femoroacetabular Impingement Randomised Controlled Trial, which evaluated the efficacy of the surgical correction of FAI via arthroscopic osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair in Canada. Long-term data were extrapolated using a generalized gamma model. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, calculated by dividing the difference in costs by the difference in QALYs between osteochondroplasty and lavage, with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to characterize uncertainty of model parameters and assumptions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a lifetime horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, had a greater expected benefit (0.63 QALYs gained per patient) and lower costs ($955.89 saved per patient), as compared with lavage with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the probability of osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, being cost-effective was 90.5% at a commonly used willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY in Canada. Across all one-way sensitivity analyses, osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair remained a cost-effective option.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Over a lifetime time horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for young adults with FAI. Future research involving real-word data is needed to further validate these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair is more cost-effective than arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for treatment of young adults with femoroacetabular impingement: A cost-utility analysis based on data from a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jiajun Yan ,&nbsp;Brittany Humphries ,&nbsp;Zhenyan Bo ,&nbsp;Ling Dai ,&nbsp;Nicole Simunovic ,&nbsp;Feng Xie ,&nbsp;Olufemi R. Ayeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to conduct a cost–utility analysis of osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) from a Canadian public payer perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Markov model was constructed to compare the lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of the two treatment strategies. The target population was surgical FAI patients aged 36 years. The primary data source was patient-level data from the Femoroacetabular Impingement Randomised Controlled Trial, which evaluated the efficacy of the surgical correction of FAI via arthroscopic osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair in Canada. Long-term data were extrapolated using a generalized gamma model. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, calculated by dividing the difference in costs by the difference in QALYs between osteochondroplasty and lavage, with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to characterize uncertainty of model parameters and assumptions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a lifetime horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, had a greater expected benefit (0.63 QALYs gained per patient) and lower costs ($955.89 saved per patient), as compared with lavage with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the probability of osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, being cost-effective was 90.5% at a commonly used willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY in Canada. Across all one-way sensitivity analyses, osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair remained a cost-effective option.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Over a lifetime time horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for young adults with FAI. Future research involving real-word data is needed to further validate these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424001548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424001548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的从加拿大公共支付方的角度,对股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)进行骨软骨置换术(带或不带髋臼唇修补术)与关节镜灌洗(带或不带髋臼唇修补术)的成本效用分析:方法: 建立马尔可夫模型,比较两种治疗策略的终生质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本。目标人群为 36 岁的 FAI 手术患者。该试验评估了在加拿大通过关节镜骨软骨成形术(带或不带唇瓣修复)与关节镜灌洗(带或不带唇瓣修复)手术矫正FAI的疗效比较。长期数据采用广义伽马模型进行推断。主要结果是增量成本效益比(ICER),计算方法是将骨软骨成形术与灌洗术之间的成本差异除以质量调整生命年(QALYs)差异(无论是否进行了唇瓣修复)。概率敏感性分析和单向敏感性分析用于描述模型参数和假设的不确定性:在终生范围内,与进行或不进行唇瓣修复的灌洗术相比,进行或不进行唇瓣修复的骨软骨成形术具有更大的预期收益(每位患者获得 0.63 QALYs)和更低的成本(每位患者节省 955.89 美元)。概率敏感性分析表明,在加拿大常用的支付意愿阈值为 50,000 美元/QALY 时,无论是否进行唇缘修复,骨软骨成形术具有成本效益的概率为 90.5%。在所有单向敏感性分析中,无论是否进行唇缘修复,骨软骨置换术仍是一种具有成本效益的选择:结论:在一生的时间跨度内,对于患有FAI的年轻成年人来说,无论是否进行唇缘修复,骨软骨成形术都是一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。未来的研究需要真实数据来进一步验证这些发现:证据等级:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair is more cost-effective than arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for treatment of young adults with femoroacetabular impingement: A cost-utility analysis based on data from a randomized controlled trial

Objectives

The objective of this study was to conduct a cost–utility analysis of osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) from a Canadian public payer perspective.

Methods

A Markov model was constructed to compare the lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of the two treatment strategies. The target population was surgical FAI patients aged 36 years. The primary data source was patient-level data from the Femoroacetabular Impingement Randomised Controlled Trial, which evaluated the efficacy of the surgical correction of FAI via arthroscopic osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair compared to arthroscopic lavage with or without labral repair in Canada. Long-term data were extrapolated using a generalized gamma model. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, calculated by dividing the difference in costs by the difference in QALYs between osteochondroplasty and lavage, with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses were used to characterize uncertainty of model parameters and assumptions.

Results

Over a lifetime horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, had a greater expected benefit (0.63 QALYs gained per patient) and lower costs ($955.89 saved per patient), as compared with lavage with or without labral repair. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the probability of osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, being cost-effective was 90.5% at a commonly used willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY in Canada. Across all one-way sensitivity analyses, osteochondroplasty with or without labral repair remained a cost-effective option.

Conclusion

Over a lifetime time horizon, osteochondroplasty, with or without labral repair, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for young adults with FAI. Future research involving real-word data is needed to further validate these findings.

Level of evidence

III.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信