通过磁共振成像放射学特征预测前列腺癌的囊外扩展:系统综述。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Adalgisa Guerra, Helen Wang, Matthew R Orton, Marianna Konidari, Nickolas K Papanikolaou, Dow Mu Koh, Helena Donato, Filipe Caseiro Alves
{"title":"通过磁共振成像放射学特征预测前列腺癌的囊外扩展:系统综述。","authors":"Adalgisa Guerra, Helen Wang, Matthew R Orton, Marianna Konidari, Nickolas K Papanikolaou, Dow Mu Koh, Helena Donato, Filipe Caseiro Alves","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01776-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this review is to survey radiomics signatures for detecting pathological extracapsular extension (pECE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent prostatectomy. Scientific Literature databases were used to search studies published from January 2007 to October 2023. All studies related to PCa MRI staging and using radiomics signatures to detect pECE after prostatectomy were included. Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The risk of bias and certainty of the evidence was assessed using QUADAS-2 and the radiomics quality score. From 1247 article titles screened, 16 reports were assessed for eligibility, and 11 studies were included in this systematic review. All used a retrospective study design and most of them used 3 T MRI. Only two studies were performed in more than one institution. The highest AUC of a model using only radiomics features was 0.85, for the test validation. The AUC for best model performance (radiomics associated with clinical/semantic features) varied from 0.72-0.92 and 0.69-0.89 for the training and validation group, respectively. Combined models performed better than radiomics signatures alone for detecting ECE. Most of the studies showed a low to medium risk of bias. After thorough analysis, we found no strong evidence supporting the clinical use of radiomics signatures for identifying extracapsular extension (ECE) in pre-surgery PCa patients. Future studies should adopt prospective multicentre approaches using large public datasets and combined models for detecting ECE.</p><p><strong>Critical relevant statement: </strong>The use of radiomics algorithms, with clinical and AI integration, in predicting extracapsular extension, could lead to the development of more accurate predictive models, which could help improve surgical planning and lead to better outcomes for prostate cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Protocol of systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42021272088. Published: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052342 .</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Radiomics can extract diagnostic features from MRI to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis performance. The combined models performed better than radiomics signatures alone for detecting extracapsular extension. Radiomics are not yet reliable for extracapsular detection in PCa patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer by MRI radiomic signature: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Adalgisa Guerra, Helen Wang, Matthew R Orton, Marianna Konidari, Nickolas K Papanikolaou, Dow Mu Koh, Helena Donato, Filipe Caseiro Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-024-01776-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this review is to survey radiomics signatures for detecting pathological extracapsular extension (pECE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent prostatectomy. Scientific Literature databases were used to search studies published from January 2007 to October 2023. All studies related to PCa MRI staging and using radiomics signatures to detect pECE after prostatectomy were included. Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The risk of bias and certainty of the evidence was assessed using QUADAS-2 and the radiomics quality score. From 1247 article titles screened, 16 reports were assessed for eligibility, and 11 studies were included in this systematic review. All used a retrospective study design and most of them used 3 T MRI. Only two studies were performed in more than one institution. The highest AUC of a model using only radiomics features was 0.85, for the test validation. The AUC for best model performance (radiomics associated with clinical/semantic features) varied from 0.72-0.92 and 0.69-0.89 for the training and validation group, respectively. Combined models performed better than radiomics signatures alone for detecting ECE. Most of the studies showed a low to medium risk of bias. After thorough analysis, we found no strong evidence supporting the clinical use of radiomics signatures for identifying extracapsular extension (ECE) in pre-surgery PCa patients. Future studies should adopt prospective multicentre approaches using large public datasets and combined models for detecting ECE.</p><p><strong>Critical relevant statement: </strong>The use of radiomics algorithms, with clinical and AI integration, in predicting extracapsular extension, could lead to the development of more accurate predictive models, which could help improve surgical planning and lead to better outcomes for prostate cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Protocol of systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42021272088. Published: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052342 .</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Radiomics can extract diagnostic features from MRI to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis performance. The combined models performed better than radiomics signatures alone for detecting extracapsular extension. Radiomics are not yet reliable for extracapsular detection in PCa patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01776-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01776-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述旨在调查磁共振成像(MRI)上检测接受前列腺切除术的前列腺癌(PCa)患者病理囊外扩展(pECE)的放射组学特征。使用科学文献数据库搜索 2007 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间发表的研究。纳入了所有与 PCa MRI 分期和使用放射组学特征检测前列腺切除术后 pECE 相关的研究。根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses,PRISMA)进行系统综述。采用QUADAS-2和放射组学质量评分对证据的偏倚风险和确定性进行评估。从筛选出的 1247 篇文章标题中,有 16 篇报告通过了资格评估,11 项研究被纳入本系统综述。所有研究均采用回顾性研究设计,其中大部分使用 3 T MRI。只有两项研究是在一家以上的机构进行的。在测试验证中,仅使用放射组学特征的模型的最高 AUC 为 0.85。在训练组和验证组中,最佳模型性能(放射组学与临床/语义特征相关)的 AUC 分别为 0.72-0.92 和 0.69-0.89 不等。在检测 ECE 方面,组合模型的表现优于单独的放射组学特征。大多数研究显示存在低至中等程度的偏倚风险。经过全面分析,我们发现没有强有力的证据支持放射组学特征在临床上用于识别手术前PCa患者的囊外扩展(ECE)。未来的研究应采用前瞻性多中心方法,使用大型公共数据集和组合模型来检测ECE:将放射组学算法与临床和人工智能相结合,用于预测囊外扩展,可以开发出更准确的预测模型,有助于改善手术规划,为前列腺癌患者带来更好的治疗效果:系统综述注册协议:PREMCO CRD42021272088。发表于:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052342 .关键点:放射组学能从核磁共振成像中提取诊断特征,从而提高前列腺癌的诊断效果。在检测囊外扩展方面,联合模型的表现优于单独的放射组学特征。放射组学在PCa患者的囊外检测方面尚不可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer by MRI radiomic signature: a systematic review.

The objective of this review is to survey radiomics signatures for detecting pathological extracapsular extension (pECE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent prostatectomy. Scientific Literature databases were used to search studies published from January 2007 to October 2023. All studies related to PCa MRI staging and using radiomics signatures to detect pECE after prostatectomy were included. Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). The risk of bias and certainty of the evidence was assessed using QUADAS-2 and the radiomics quality score. From 1247 article titles screened, 16 reports were assessed for eligibility, and 11 studies were included in this systematic review. All used a retrospective study design and most of them used 3 T MRI. Only two studies were performed in more than one institution. The highest AUC of a model using only radiomics features was 0.85, for the test validation. The AUC for best model performance (radiomics associated with clinical/semantic features) varied from 0.72-0.92 and 0.69-0.89 for the training and validation group, respectively. Combined models performed better than radiomics signatures alone for detecting ECE. Most of the studies showed a low to medium risk of bias. After thorough analysis, we found no strong evidence supporting the clinical use of radiomics signatures for identifying extracapsular extension (ECE) in pre-surgery PCa patients. Future studies should adopt prospective multicentre approaches using large public datasets and combined models for detecting ECE.

Critical relevant statement: The use of radiomics algorithms, with clinical and AI integration, in predicting extracapsular extension, could lead to the development of more accurate predictive models, which could help improve surgical planning and lead to better outcomes for prostate cancer patients.

Protocol of systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42021272088. Published: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052342 .

Key points: Radiomics can extract diagnostic features from MRI to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis performance. The combined models performed better than radiomics signatures alone for detecting extracapsular extension. Radiomics are not yet reliable for extracapsular detection in PCa patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信