多次自杀未遂的致死率进展:系统回顾

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz
{"title":"多次自杀未遂的致死率进展:系统回顾","authors":"Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Gamal Wafy, Lin Ajayi, Sara Siddiqi, Taylor Saravanamuttoo, Risa Shorr, Marco Solmi, Ian Colman, Jess G Fiedorowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2024.2394671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自杀是全球关注的一大公共卫生问题。虽然在了解自杀行为的风险因素方面取得了一些进展,但其他相关问题受到的关注却较少。其中一个问题涉及多次自杀未遂者自杀行为的纵向发展过程。本系统综述调查了多次自杀未遂的致死率是否会增加:本系统综述遵循 PRISMA 2020 报告指南。从开始到 2023 年 8 月,在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 PsycINFO 电子数据库中进行了文献检索,以确定与多次自杀未遂和致死率相关的研究。综述包括具有多次自杀未遂数据的纵向研究,以及对其致死率的任何评级。Covidence用于指导筛选和提取过程。采用叙事综合法对纳入的研究进行描述性总结:结果:在筛选出 828 份独特的摘要后,纳入了 11 项研究进行叙述性综合。自杀未遂的评估方法和定义各不相同,通常根据自杀未遂的方法间接推断致死率。重复尝试自杀的人可能更倾向于继续使用相同的方法:没有证据表明重复自杀未遂会增加致死率。然而,在解释这一点时,还应考虑到证据基础稀缺、异质性强且方法有限这一事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Suicide is a major global public health concern. While some progress has been made in understanding risk factors for suicidal behavior, other relevant questions have received less attention. One such question relates to the longitudinal course of suicidal behavior amongst individuals with multiple suicide attempts. This systematic review investigated whether there is an increase in the lethality across multiple suicide attempts.

Method: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO electronic databases from inception to August 2023 to identify studies with key terms related to multiple suicide attempts and lethality. The review included longitudinal studies with data on multiple suicide attempts, and any rating of their lethality. Covidence was used to guide the screening and extraction process. A narrative synthesis approach was used to descriptively summarize included studies.

Results: After identifying 828 unique abstracts for screening, 11 studies were included for narrative synthesis. Suicide attempt assessment methods and definitions were heterogenous, often indirectly inferring lethality based on suicide attempt method. Individuals with repeat attempts may be more likely to continue using the same method.

Conclusions: There was no evidence to support increasing lethality across repeat suicide attempts. However, this should be interpreted along with the fact that the evidence base is scarce, heterogenous, and methodologically limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信