Amrita Balgobind MD , Matthew Pierce MD , Carlos Alviar MD , Christopher Barnett MD , Gregory Barsness MD , Sunit-preet Chaudhry MD , Meshe Chonde MD , Howard Cooper MD , Lori Daniels MD , Umesh Gidwani MD , Christopher Fordyce MD , Michael Goldfarb MD , Jason N. Katz MD , Michael Kontos MD , Younghoon Kwon MD , Evan Liebner MD, PhD , Shuangbo Liu MD , P. Elliott Miller MD, MHS , L.K. Newby MD , Connor O'Brien MD , Miguel Alvarez Villela MD
{"title":"临时机械循环支持管理的当前做法:对北美 CICU 主任的调查","authors":"Amrita Balgobind MD , Matthew Pierce MD , Carlos Alviar MD , Christopher Barnett MD , Gregory Barsness MD , Sunit-preet Chaudhry MD , Meshe Chonde MD , Howard Cooper MD , Lori Daniels MD , Umesh Gidwani MD , Christopher Fordyce MD , Michael Goldfarb MD , Jason N. Katz MD , Michael Kontos MD , Younghoon Kwon MD , Evan Liebner MD, PhD , Shuangbo Liu MD , P. Elliott Miller MD, MHS , L.K. Newby MD , Connor O'Brien MD , Miguel Alvarez Villela MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the growing use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), little data exists to inform management and weaning of these devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed an online survey among cardiac intensive care unit directors in North America to examine current practices in the management of patients treated with intraaortic balloon pump and Impella.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We received responses from 84% of surveyed centers (n=37). Our survey focused on three key aspects of daily management: 1. Hemodynamic monitoring; 2. Hemocompatibility; and 3. Weaning and removal. We found substantial variability surrounding all three areas of care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings highlight the need for consensus around practices associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with tMCS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"276 ","pages":"Pages 115-119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current practices in the management of temporary mechanical circulatory support: A survey of CICU directors in North America\",\"authors\":\"Amrita Balgobind MD , Matthew Pierce MD , Carlos Alviar MD , Christopher Barnett MD , Gregory Barsness MD , Sunit-preet Chaudhry MD , Meshe Chonde MD , Howard Cooper MD , Lori Daniels MD , Umesh Gidwani MD , Christopher Fordyce MD , Michael Goldfarb MD , Jason N. Katz MD , Michael Kontos MD , Younghoon Kwon MD , Evan Liebner MD, PhD , Shuangbo Liu MD , P. Elliott Miller MD, MHS , L.K. Newby MD , Connor O'Brien MD , Miguel Alvarez Villela MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Despite the growing use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), little data exists to inform management and weaning of these devices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed an online survey among cardiac intensive care unit directors in North America to examine current practices in the management of patients treated with intraaortic balloon pump and Impella.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We received responses from 84% of surveyed centers (n=37). Our survey focused on three key aspects of daily management: 1. Hemodynamic monitoring; 2. Hemocompatibility; and 3. Weaning and removal. We found substantial variability surrounding all three areas of care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings highlight the need for consensus around practices associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with tMCS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000287032400142X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000287032400142X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current practices in the management of temporary mechanical circulatory support: A survey of CICU directors in North America
Introduction
Despite the growing use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS), little data exists to inform management and weaning of these devices.
Methods
We performed an online survey among cardiac intensive care unit directors in North America to examine current practices in the management of patients treated with intraaortic balloon pump and Impella.
Results
We received responses from 84% of surveyed centers (n=37). Our survey focused on three key aspects of daily management: 1. Hemodynamic monitoring; 2. Hemocompatibility; and 3. Weaning and removal. We found substantial variability surrounding all three areas of care.
Conclusion
Our findings highlight the need for consensus around practices associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with tMCS.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.